From: Jean-frederic C. <jf...@si...> - 2001-07-08 20:33:01
|
Ok, I have increased the buffer (Note the snprintf cannot be used because it is unresolved). Rogier Wolff wrote: > Jean-frederic Clere wrote: > > > As I get some stuff done I will put a small sanity check around it. > > > If we do get more that the allocated amount, then bad luck :). > > > > Actualy the quickcam needs most of the USB bandwith: To run 2 quickcams I need > > 2 boards... 10 quickcams would be 10 boards it does not sounds realistic. > > Anyway it costs nothing to use snprintf() instead sprintf(). (It prevents the > > oops if any). > > What would YOU want to do with 10 quickcams? I'd want to have one in > every corner of my place and take one pic every second with each of > them. > > One QC does 30 frames per second, so 10 should be able to take one > each, allowing for a factor of 3 of "ineffciency". > > To be able to montitor the whole museum, I may want to take a picture > every 5 secs with over 100 of these cameras. I may buy an industrial > PC and put 15 PCI USB adapters in there. That would give me 30 times > 11 mbps, right? So at 10 cams per USB port, I'd be able to connect > around 300 cams.... So we'd be running out of minors before hitting > the limit. > > My recommendation: Allocate enough space for an unbelievable amount of > cams. It will one day save some soul with an odd project quite some > headaches... > > Roger. > > -- > ** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2137555 ** > *-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --* > * There are old pilots, and there are bold pilots. > * There are also old, bald pilots. > > _______________________________________________ > Qce-ga-devel mailing list > Qce...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qce-ga-devel |