Re: [Portableaserve-discuss] Status of SSL support for CMUCL

[Rudi S. <ru...@co...>]

On 4. Feb 2004, at 16:08, Jochen Schmidt wrote:
[snippage]
>
> It's still a mess. There seems to be ssl-related stuff in 
> cmucl/acl-socket.lisp and at other places.
> I think the best would be to distribute cl-ssl (which is now not much 
> more than FFI definitions for OpenSSL)
> with ACL-COMPAT and maybe test somehow for the OpenSSL libs before 
> compiling.
>
> I could commit my changes to get it running so far if no one speaks 
> against it.
>

I say go for it.  Messes will be fixed, eventually.

[Any opinion on replacing your current acl-compat uri implementation 
with kmr's puri?]

Greetings,

Rudi