Re: [Podofo-users] podofo vs. libpoppler: What should a pdf-parsing application use?
A PDF parsing, modification and creation library.
Brought to you by:
domseichter
|
From: Frank <fr...@ku...> - 2007-02-02 20:11:47
|
Hi Craig, thanks for you answer. Lots of information, and it gives a good impression of where you're aiming. Craig Ringer <cr...@po...> wrote: > I don't envy the PdfTeX guys, since I honestly don't think there's an > obvious best choice here. I'd like to believe that PoDoFo will be the > best choice down the track given its goals and design, but right now > ... I'm really not sure what their best option is.=20 I guess the best option at this point is a pragmatic one: Stay with the xpdf code (maybe in the poppler form), but don't fix oneself to it too much. And we Debian guys will continue to use our poppler patch (which is rather crude and non-autoconf'able). I'll discuss this with Martin. Regards, Frank --=20 Dr. Frank K=FCster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Z= =FCrich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive) |