From: Rafael L. <lab...@ps...> - 2003-10-16 08:01:59
|
* Alan W. Irwin <ai...@us...> [2003-10-15 18:25]: > I am quite uneasy about this. Our experience is the autotools results > depend critically on having consistent versions. A system libltdl loses > that critical version consistency, and I expect it is going to cause us > trouble. So please change your options around so the default is to use the > standard tested convenience library approach with the user having to > specifically ask for the experimental option --enable-ltdl-system, if they > want to take a chance on it. Yes, your arguments are sensible and I will consider your suggestion. Anyway, I am not totally happy with my present solution, since it does not work when the user try to override some of the choices. The problem is more complex that I thought and I will re-implement the solution. For now, HEAD should work as before for people that does not have the libltdl installed (I guess this is the general case). -- Rafael |