Re: [Playerstage-users] Re: sensor for amcl && mutiple robots simulation

[Michael J. <ja...@ba...>]

On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Richard vaughan wrote:
> On 18-Jul-05, at 12:03 PM, Mike Gauthier wrote:
> 
> >You have two position drivers defined for the same port (6665).   
> >Every agent you
> >want to run must be on a different port.
> 
> This is not correct. Drivers do not have to be on unique ports. For  
> example, 6665:position:0 and 6665:position:1 can be mapped by  
> separate drivers, as in Tingting's example. However, the Stage driver  
> requires a unique model name for each instance of the driver.
> 
> Richard/

How hard would it be to change this behavior?  It seems
counterintuitive for some drivers, especially ones like blobfinder,
where you could easily want more than one on the same model.   I am
offering to do it myself, but I haven't dove in to see what specific 
obstacles need to be overcome and I thought you may have some thoughts
on the issue.

-- 
Michael Janssen --- Jamuraa --- ja...@ba... --- ja...@de...