From: Fred L. <ff...@ab...> - 2005-05-26 17:28:24
|
On Thu, 26 May 2005 10:20:24 -0500 Victor Manuel J=E1quez Leal <ce...@gm...> wrote: > mmmhh... >=20 > It seems a broken kernel headers or some like that. What happen if > you disable the camerav4l? which seems to be the issue. Can you tell me why adding `use_enable camerav4l` \ after the similar ones in the ebuild does not offer this use flag (I'm a total ignorant of ebuilds...)? Did compile fine after adding --disable-camerav4l \ at the appropriate place. Any idea where I could report the problem? Fred |