Menu
▾
▴
phpwebsite-developers — For our development team.
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(265) |
Apr
(166) |
May
(25) |
Jun
(17) |
Jul
(20) |
Aug
(47) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(66) |
Dec
(64) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(64) |
Mar
(34) |
Apr
(23) |
May
(64) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(33) |
Oct
(272) |
Nov
(67) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(264) |
Feb
(244) |
Mar
(171) |
Apr
(119) |
May
(54) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(51) |
Aug
(48) |
Sep
(14) |
Oct
(49) |
Nov
(47) |
Dec
(15) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(27) |
Mar
(18) |
Apr
(44) |
May
(35) |
Jun
(24) |
Jul
(39) |
Aug
(142) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(24) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(60) |
Feb
(71) |
Mar
(19) |
Apr
(27) |
May
(68) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(23) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(13) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(46) |
Mar
(64) |
Apr
(18) |
May
(16) |
Jun
(37) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(19) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(23) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(25) |
Feb
(21) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(36) |
May
(12) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
|
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(3) |
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Matthew M. <ma...@tu...> - 2003-04-03 15:10:23
|
> Hey, > I've been working on some new themes using 0.9.0cvs version from March > 31st. > When viewing an announcement with comments for that announcement, the > comments are stuck above the announcement and I can't move them at all > like > I did with previous versions of phpws. Using layout's Move Box isn't working? Matt |
|
From: Mike W. <wi...@ce...> - 2003-04-03 15:09:43
|
I downloaded today's cvs and this problem is gone. Oh well that's good. Mike ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Windsor" <wi...@ce...> To: "phpWebSite developers" <php...@li...> Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 9:22 PM Subject: [Phpwebsite-developers] Comments in Announcements > Hey, > I've been working on some new themes using 0.9.0cvs version from March 31st. > When viewing an announcement with comments for that announcement, the > comments are stuck above the announcement and I can't move them at all like > I did with previous versions of phpws. Did something change or am I missing > something obvious? > > Mike > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: > Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! > No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server > http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Phpwebsite-developers mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwebsite-developers > > |
|
From: Mike W. <wi...@ce...> - 2003-04-03 03:23:53
|
Hey, I've been working on some new themes using 0.9.0cvs version from March 31st. When viewing an announcement with comments for that announcement, the comments are stuck above the announcement and I can't move them at all like I did with previous versions of phpws. Did something change or am I missing something obvious? Mike |
|
From: Don S. <do...@se...> - 2003-04-02 16:17:17
|
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18645 Now we play the waiting game. I'm going see what it takes to become a gentoo ebuild wrangler. It seems they may be understaffed for that kind of thing. Don. On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Don Seiler wrote: > I will work on an ebuild for gentoo linux to install phpwebsite. I'll > start soonish on 0.9.0 and then 0.9.1 when that is out. However the > turnaround is slow now on new ebuild submissions being checked into > portage. I submitted tora 1.3.9.2 on February 9th and it's still not in. > > Don. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: > Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! > No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server > http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Phpwebsite-developers mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwebsite-developers > > > |
|
From: Don S. <do...@se...> - 2003-04-02 04:45:56
|
I will work on an ebuild for gentoo linux to install phpwebsite. I'll start soonish on 0.9.0 and then 0.9.1 when that is out. However the turnaround is slow now on new ebuild submissions being checked into portage. I submitted tora 1.3.9.2 on February 9th and it's still not in. Don. |
|
From: Don S. <do...@se...> - 2003-04-01 16:14:40
|
To quote "Police Cops" from Simpsons: " ... and that's the end of THAT chapter." Don. On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Steven Levin wrote: > Php says here: > > http://www.php.net/manual/en/reserved.variables.php > > that prior to 4.3.0 the files information was also stored in the $_REQUEST > array. After that no longer. > > Steven > > > Hm I can't say. I'm running php 4.3.1. I believe that PHP says to use > > $HTTP_POST_FILES for files. > > > > Don. > > > > On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Matthew McNaney wrote: > > > >> > phatfile's File.php save() function references the > >> $_REQUEST["PHAT_FILE"] > >> > object. I do believe this needs to be $_FILES["PHAT_FILE"]. I > >> believe > >> > this because I ran into the same mistake in one of my own mods, and > >> > because phatfile doesn't save unless I change those REQUEST calls to > >> FILES > >> > for PHAT_FILE. > >> > >> This has been changed in CVS. Though I agree that $_FILES is more > >> precise, > >> REQUEST works in our installations. Is there a reason why $_REQUEST does > >> not function? I am running 4.2.2. > >> > >> Just curious :) > >> Matt > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------- > >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: > >> Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! > >> No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server > >> http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Phpwebsite-developers mailing list > >> Php...@li... > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwebsite-developers > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: > > Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! > > No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server > > http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Phpwebsite-developers mailing list > > Php...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwebsite-developers > > > > > |
|
From: Steven L. <st...@tu...> - 2003-04-01 16:06:17
|
Php says here: http://www.php.net/manual/en/reserved.variables.php that prior to 4.3.0 the files information was also stored in the $_REQUEST array. After that no longer. Steven > Hm I can't say. I'm running php 4.3.1. I believe that PHP says to use > $HTTP_POST_FILES for files. > > Don. > > On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Matthew McNaney wrote: > >> > phatfile's File.php save() function references the >> $_REQUEST["PHAT_FILE"] >> > object. I do believe this needs to be $_FILES["PHAT_FILE"]. I >> believe >> > this because I ran into the same mistake in one of my own mods, and >> > because phatfile doesn't save unless I change those REQUEST calls to >> FILES >> > for PHAT_FILE. >> >> This has been changed in CVS. Though I agree that $_FILES is more >> precise, >> REQUEST works in our installations. Is there a reason why $_REQUEST does >> not function? I am running 4.2.2. >> >> Just curious :) >> Matt >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: >> Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! >> No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server >> http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Phpwebsite-developers mailing list >> Php...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwebsite-developers >> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: > Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! > No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server > http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Phpwebsite-developers mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwebsite-developers > -- Steven Levin Electronic Student Services Appalachian State University Phone: 828.262.2431 PhpWebsite Development Team URL: http://phpwebsite.appstate.edu Email: st...@NO... |
|
From: Don S. <do...@se...> - 2003-04-01 15:59:19
|
Hm I can't say. I'm running php 4.3.1. I believe that PHP says to use $HTTP_POST_FILES for files. Don. On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Matthew McNaney wrote: > > phatfile's File.php save() function references the $_REQUEST["PHAT_FILE"] > > object. I do believe this needs to be $_FILES["PHAT_FILE"]. I believe > > this because I ran into the same mistake in one of my own mods, and > > because phatfile doesn't save unless I change those REQUEST calls to FILES > > for PHAT_FILE. > > This has been changed in CVS. Though I agree that $_FILES is more precise, > REQUEST works in our installations. Is there a reason why $_REQUEST does > not function? I am running 4.2.2. > > Just curious :) > Matt > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: > Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! > No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server > http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Phpwebsite-developers mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwebsite-developers > > > |
|
From: Matthew M. <ma...@tu...> - 2003-04-01 15:58:43
|
> Currently core's PHPWS_Form::formDate() function prints a date form in the > MM/DD/YYYY fashion. I tend to cringe when I see this. I realize that > much of America uses this format, I think the majority of the rest of the > world uses DD/MM/YYYY or YYYY/MM/DD, the latter of which I prefer. Can we > add a parameter to formDate to indicate which format to print the form > element in? Like 0 for the MM/DD/YYYY (default), 1 for DD/MM/YYYY and 2 > for YYYY/MM/DD. I think it would be easier to convince the rest of the world that they are doing it wrong. Did that sound overly Bushy? In any case, this can be set in DateSettings but what needs to be set is multiple language support. I will take another look at it. matt |
|
From: Matthew M. <ma...@tu...> - 2003-04-01 15:53:52
|
> phatfile's File.php save() function references the $_REQUEST["PHAT_FILE"] > object. I do believe this needs to be $_FILES["PHAT_FILE"]. I believe > this because I ran into the same mistake in one of my own mods, and > because phatfile doesn't save unless I change those REQUEST calls to FILES > for PHAT_FILE. This has been changed in CVS. Though I agree that $_FILES is more precise, REQUEST works in our installations. Is there a reason why $_REQUEST does not function? I am running 4.2.2. Just curious :) Matt |
|
From: Don S. <do...@se...> - 2003-04-01 15:24:50
|
Currently core's PHPWS_Form::formDate() function prints a date form in the MM/DD/YYYY fashion. I tend to cringe when I see this. I realize that much of America uses this format, I think the majority of the rest of the world uses DD/MM/YYYY or YYYY/MM/DD, the latter of which I prefer. Can we add a parameter to formDate to indicate which format to print the form element in? Like 0 for the MM/DD/YYYY (default), 1 for DD/MM/YYYY and 2 for YYYY/MM/DD. Don. |
|
From: Matthew M. <ma...@tu...> - 2003-04-01 14:19:14
|
> Had this happen on two machines today. After checking out the latest CVS, > no matter what I try to change the theme to it stays on "Default". I try > to track it down later but thought I'd throw this out for now in case > someone else had a minute. Thanks Don. It is now fixed in CVS. Matthew McNaney Internet Systems Architect Electronic Student Services Appalachian State University Phone: 828-262-6493 phpwebsite.appstate.edu ess.appstate.edu |
|
From: Matthew M. <ma...@tu...> - 2003-04-01 01:34:39
|
> Is the postgres support supposed to work? Absolutely. 'Supposed to' being the key phrase. Don told me about the error in setup and that has been fixed. If you would like to lend a hand, point out any incompatibilities and I will be happy to repair them. Sincerely, Matthew McNaney Internet Systems Architect Electronic Student Services Appalachian State University Phone: 828-262-6493 phpwebsite.appstate.edu ess.appstate.edu |
|
From: Don S. <do...@se...> - 2003-03-31 23:53:06
|
Had this happen on two machines today. After checking out the latest CVS, no matter what I try to change the theme to it stays on "Default". I try to track it down later but thought I'd throw this out for now in case someone else had a minute. Don. |
|
From: Don S. <do...@se...> - 2003-03-31 23:46:00
|
phatfile's File.php save() function references the $_REQUEST["PHAT_FILE"] object. I do believe this needs to be $_FILES["PHAT_FILE"]. I believe this because I ran into the same mistake in one of my own mods, and because phatfile doesn't save unless I change those REQUEST calls to FILES for PHAT_FILE. Don. |
|
From: Projet/Objet <li...@pr...> - 2003-03-31 19:58:17
|
If this may be of any help ... Just to let you know that I am downloading for testing with this command: cvs -z3 -d:pserver:ano...@re...:/home/cvsroot login cvs -z3 -d:pserver:ano...@re...:/home/cvsroot co phpwebsite-full And.. I got this error down at the bootom of the exhaustive listing ;-) cvs server: Updating phpwebsite/mod/faq cvs server: failed to create lock directory for `/home/cvsroot/faq' (/home/cvsroot/faq/#cvs.lock): Permission denied cvs server: failed to obtain dir lock in repository `/home/cvsroot/faq' cvs [server aborted]: read lock failed - giving up bash-2.05a$ I'll let you know when I'm done ;-) Regards, Yves Malouin http://www.malouin.qc.ca |
|
From: Matthew M. <ma...@tu...> - 2003-03-31 18:44:44
|
Hello True Believers, We were hoping to get 0.9.1 rc1 out today but, as expected, quality tests hit snags. There have been a bunch of fixes and polish done today but we still aren't sure it is ready for prime time. Would you like to help? Of course you would. Check out a copy of CVS and start clicking through the modules. Try to break it. Anything you come across, please post it to the bugs section of sourceforge. If/when you do, we will start attacking that list Monday. We are pretty sure 0.9.1 rc1 will be ready by next week. Note that when installing the CVS copy that polls is still a little buggy and faq is not finished (two things that might be ready for rc). There are also two special surprises from Adam and Steven that you can test. I will let you find them :) If you don't pick them up in checkout, check the CVS list on res1. Thanks for you help, Matthew McNaney Internet Systems Architect Electronic Student Services Appalachian State University Phone: 828-262-6493 phpwebsite.appstate.edu ess.appstate.edu |
|
From: Don S. <do...@se...> - 2003-03-31 17:22:57
|
Cool. If you want me to test anything let me know. Don. On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Eloi George wrote: > Already working on it. > > I'm almost finished coding & I don't even have a name for it yet. <grin> > > Eloi > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Don Seiler" <do...@se...> > To: "phpws dev list" <php...@li...> > Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 4:15 PM > Subject: Re: [Phpwebsite-developers] bulletin board module > > > > Me again. I see that comments needs to have a module and itemid. So what > > if we were to just create a dummy "phpwsBB" module that only has 1 item. > > So in essence we would have a long set of comments for a single item, but > > in my mind it would behave exactly like a web message board. > > > > What do you think? > > > > Don. > > > > On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, Don Seiler wrote: > > > > > Is anyone considering writing a bulletin board module? I need something > > > like a simple "Matt's WWWBoard", nothing requiring logins or anything. > > > I realize that the "comments" system acts just like this. Can comments > be > > > used just as a standalone page? > > > > > > Don. > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > > > The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There! > > > NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today! > > > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Phpwebsite-developers mailing list > > > Php...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwebsite-developers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > > The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There! > > NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today! > > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en > > _______________________________________________ > > Phpwebsite-developers mailing list > > Php...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwebsite-developers > > > > > > > > > |
|
From: Eloi G. <el...@re...> - 2003-03-31 17:12:27
|
Already working on it. I'm almost finished coding & I don't even have a name for it yet. <grin> Eloi ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Seiler" <do...@se...> To: "phpws dev list" <php...@li...> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 4:15 PM Subject: Re: [Phpwebsite-developers] bulletin board module > Me again. I see that comments needs to have a module and itemid. So what > if we were to just create a dummy "phpwsBB" module that only has 1 item. > So in essence we would have a long set of comments for a single item, but > in my mind it would behave exactly like a web message board. > > What do you think? > > Don. > > On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, Don Seiler wrote: > > > Is anyone considering writing a bulletin board module? I need something > > like a simple "Matt's WWWBoard", nothing requiring logins or anything. > > I realize that the "comments" system acts just like this. Can comments be > > used just as a standalone page? > > > > Don. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > > The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There! > > NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today! > > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en > > _______________________________________________ > > Phpwebsite-developers mailing list > > Php...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwebsite-developers > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There! > NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today! > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en > _______________________________________________ > Phpwebsite-developers mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwebsite-developers > > |
|
From: Don S. <do...@se...> - 2003-03-31 15:20:56
|
NOTE: The phpWS staff on the appstate campus are having problems with their email server and cannot send or receive emails to/from sourceforge.net's servers. Matt asked me to send this: --- Hello True Believers, We were hoping to get 0.9.1 rc1 out Friday but, as expected, quality tests hit snags. There have been a bunch of fixes and polish done today but we still aren't sure it is ready for prime time. Would you like to help? Of course you would. Check out a copy of CVS and start clicking through the modules. Try to break it. Anything you come across, please post it to the bugs section of sourceforge. If/when you do, we will start attacking that list Monday. We are pretty sure 0.9.1 rc1 will be ready by next week. Note that when installing the CVS copy that polls is still a little buggy and faq is not finished (two things that might be ready for rc). There are also two special surprises from Adam and Steven that you can test. I will let you find them :) If you don't pick them up in checkout, check the CVS list on res1. Thanks for you help, Matthew McNaney Internet Systems Architect Electronic Student Services Appalachian State University Phone: 828-262-6493 phpwebsite.appstate.edu ess.appstate.edu |
|
From: Don S. <do...@se...> - 2003-03-30 20:52:00
|
Mike Windsor was kind enough not to embarrass me publicly with the fact that <img> wasn't in $allowed_tags. All is well in blockmaker land. Don. On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, Don Seiler wrote: > For some reason when I try to save a block maker entry with an img tag the > entire image tag is not saved. My particular case is below. It is one of > those "weather magnets" from weather.com: > > <img border=1 width=270 height=140 > SRC="http://oap.weather.com/fcgi-bin/oap/generate_magnet?loc_id=USWI0416&code=243371"> > > None of that source is saved when I save the block, although I get a > successful save message. > > Don. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There! > NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today! > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en > _______________________________________________ > Phpwebsite-developers mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwebsite-developers > > > |
|
From: Don S. <do...@se...> - 2003-03-30 20:33:46
|
For some reason when I try to save a block maker entry with an img tag the entire image tag is not saved. My particular case is below. It is one of those "weather magnets" from weather.com: <img border=1 width=270 height=140 SRC="http://oap.weather.com/fcgi-bin/oap/generate_magnet?loc_id=USWI0416&code=243371"> None of that source is saved when I save the block, although I get a successful save message. Don. |
|
From: Don S. <do...@se...> - 2003-03-30 20:21:53
|
Me again. I see that comments needs to have a module and itemid. So what if we were to just create a dummy "phpwsBB" module that only has 1 item. So in essence we would have a long set of comments for a single item, but in my mind it would behave exactly like a web message board. What do you think? Don. On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, Don Seiler wrote: > Is anyone considering writing a bulletin board module? I need something > like a simple "Matt's WWWBoard", nothing requiring logins or anything. > I realize that the "comments" system acts just like this. Can comments be > used just as a standalone page? > > Don. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There! > NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today! > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en > _______________________________________________ > Phpwebsite-developers mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwebsite-developers > > > |
|
From: Don S. <do...@se...> - 2003-03-30 20:16:14
|
Is anyone considering writing a bulletin board module? I need something like a simple "Matt's WWWBoard", nothing requiring logins or anything. I realize that the "comments" system acts just like this. Can comments be used just as a standalone page? Don. |
|
From: Don S. <do...@se...> - 2003-03-30 04:33:14
|
I recent switched my home lan so that it only runs https. Do we not have support for https servers or am I missing something? By https servers I more or less mean URLs beginning with "https" instead of "http". Don. |
5 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
