You can subscribe to this list here.
2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(265) |
Apr
(166) |
May
(25) |
Jun
(17) |
Jul
(20) |
Aug
(47) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(66) |
Dec
(64) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(64) |
Mar
(34) |
Apr
(23) |
May
(64) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(33) |
Oct
(272) |
Nov
(67) |
Dec
(75) |
2003 |
Jan
(264) |
Feb
(244) |
Mar
(171) |
Apr
(119) |
May
(54) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(51) |
Aug
(48) |
Sep
(14) |
Oct
(49) |
Nov
(47) |
Dec
(15) |
2004 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(27) |
Mar
(18) |
Apr
(44) |
May
(35) |
Jun
(24) |
Jul
(39) |
Aug
(142) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(24) |
2005 |
Jan
(60) |
Feb
(71) |
Mar
(19) |
Apr
(27) |
May
(68) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(23) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(13) |
Dec
(6) |
2006 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(46) |
Mar
(64) |
Apr
(18) |
May
(16) |
Jun
(37) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(19) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(23) |
2007 |
Jan
(25) |
Feb
(21) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(36) |
May
(12) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2008 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
|
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2009 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(3) |
2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Matthew M. <ma...@tu...> - 2003-05-05 11:39:02
|
> The form class has a lot of great stuff for generating a form real > quick however I feel it is very limited. We are trying to phase out the current core class to the more flexible EZform class. Please take a look and let us know if there are options you would like to see in it. Matthew McNaney Internet Systems Architect Electronic Student Services Appalachian State University Phone: 828-262-6493 phpwebsite.appstate.edu ess.appstate.edu |
From: Richard S. <ri...@ri...> - 2003-05-05 03:20:56
|
Holly shit! That is just sooo rude! But anyways, how does Microsoft plan to rule the world if they keep crashing? On Saturday, May 3, 2003, at 08:37 AM, Steven Levin wrote: > Hello all, > > Check out this article running on /. Seems as though you can wreck > shop > for IE with just a little HTML. I was able to view it just fine in > Phoenix :) > > http://slashdot.org/articles/03/05/02/ > 1845241.shtml?tid=126&tid=95&tid=128&tid=113 > > > -- > Steven Levin > Electronic Student Services > Appalachian State University > Phone: 828.262.2431 > PhpWebsite Development Team > URL: http://phpwebsite.appstate.edu > Email: st...@NO... > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Phpwebsite-developers mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwebsite-developers > > |
From: Richard S. <ri...@ri...> - 2003-05-05 03:14:47
|
The form class has a lot of great stuff for generating a form real quick however I feel it is very limited. My personal concern in it is that it does not have a parameter to disabled a form element but that's just one out of many possible problems that can be upcoming. Maybe it would be better if we add one more parameters to each one of the form elements called 'misc' or something that lets us add our own code to the form element rather than having too many parameters in the function itself for each possible piece of code that can be typed inside a tag so they wont be very limited? That will prove to be really helpful! Best Regards, Richard Sumilang |
From: Steven L. <st...@tu...> - 2003-05-03 15:35:27
|
Hello all, Check out this article running on /. Seems as though you can wreck shop for IE with just a little HTML. I was able to view it just fine in Phoenix :) http://slashdot.org/articles/03/05/02/1845241.shtml?tid=126&tid=95&tid=128&tid=113 -- Steven Levin Electronic Student Services Appalachian State University Phone: 828.262.2431 PhpWebsite Development Team URL: http://phpwebsite.appstate.edu Email: st...@NO... |
From: Don S. <do...@se...> - 2003-05-02 21:40:11
|
Just to follow up, I was able to set the session manager to NULL and unset() it in the update.php, and then core reloaded it afterwards for me, so that was the trick. Thanks to the krew in #phpwebsite. Don. On Wed, 23 Apr 2003, Don Seiler wrote: > Wondering how I can force my module's "Manager" class to reload itself, or > at least make calls the various load functions after the module is > upgraded to the latest version. > > For now I just print a message asking the admin to log out and back in. > > Basically I've tried making calls to $_SESSION["SES_LISTINGS_MANAGER"] or > redefining it. I do that from my update.php script but it doesn't seem to > want to work, as I get errors about not being able to find the item class > definition. > > Just wondering what you guys recommend. > > Don. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Phpwebsite-developers mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwebsite-developers > > > |
From: Don S. <do...@se...> - 2003-05-02 21:37:42
|
I saw that someone made a wrapper module for phpBB. I'd like to do the same for phorum, which is a more lightweight BB than phpBB. Does anyone have any docs on doing this "wrapper" modules? Don. On Thu, 17 Apr 2003, Patrick Naubert wrote: > Eloi had a BB module for 0.9.x almost completed. > > I would like to Beta test or help finish it off. I need it immediatly for a > new installation of 0.9.1 > > Thanks > > Pat > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Phpwebsite-developers mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwebsite-developers > > > |
From: Matthew M. <ma...@tu...> - 2003-05-01 20:22:28
|
> That sounds like a it would be a nice mod? matt == moron I mistakenly send to this list to often. Matt |
From: Eloi G. <el...@re...> - 2003-05-01 20:07:20
|
Wow. You got on that immediately. Every day you find more ways to impress me! > Some of the reasons you are seeing all these extra SQL calls is that we > received another warning a few months ago. > > That warning was that we were using far too much memory. So we reduced the > dependance on the GLOBALS array. Yes, but I thought the warning was more about -duplicate- information being stored. > So the question is, which is it? Do we want to depend upon the database > each time to get our information? Or do you want offload some of the work > by storing results in GLOBALS? I personally feel that the DB always needs to be treated as a bottleneck by encapsulating the work to be done in each - the DB should handle ordering & filtering and the accesses should be as gross or greedy as possible. All other manipulation should be done on the front end. All data retrieved should be freed from memory as soon as it's not needed - if I query data and fetch_ it into an array and then pass it by value to another function to write to other variables, then there's probably 3 or four copies of the data hanging around before the PHP compiler starts garbage collection. Others may feel different, so I agree with your choice to let us select our method in the cache config. > Now that we know that classes eat up most of the memory, we may decide to > place some data back and reduce DB calls. That'd be great! -Eloi- |
From: Richard S. <ri...@ri...> - 2003-05-01 19:51:23
|
That sounds like a it would be a nice mod? On Thursday, May 1, 2003, at 09:05 AM, Matthew McNaney wrote: > Need your time sheets by Friday at 11:00am. If I am not in, put them > in my > box. > > Matt > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Phpwebsite-developers mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwebsite-developers > > |
From: Matthew M. <ma...@tu...> - 2003-05-01 16:04:06
|
Need your time sheets by Friday at 11:00am. If I am not in, put them in my box. Matt |
From: Mike W. <wi...@ce...> - 2003-05-01 15:02:06
|
Here is more on the subject if you want to make your own code. http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/author/filter/reference/filters/alphaimag eloader.asp Mike Windsor ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew McNaney" <ma...@tu...> To: <php...@li...> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 9:24 AM Subject: Re: [Phpwebsite-developers] Transparent PNG's and Interent Explorer > > Hey remember that IE doesn't support transparent png's using alpha channel > > transparency? Well someone has written a php script that will detect the > > browser and add a specific filter and make it work. Here is the link > > http://www.artisfaction.com/transparent_png/ or you can download it > > directly at http://www.artisfaction.com/transparent_png/Trans_PNG.zip > > > > I haven't looked at it yet but the samples work. I think theme developers > > could include it if I'm not mistaken. > > > > Cool. We could have it work with imageTag. > > Matt > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Phpwebsite-developers mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwebsite-developers > > |
From: Matthew M. <ma...@tu...> - 2003-05-01 14:23:12
|
> Hey remember that IE doesn't support transparent png's using alpha channel > transparency? Well someone has written a php script that will detect the > browser and add a specific filter and make it work. Here is the link > http://www.artisfaction.com/transparent_png/ or you can download it > directly at http://www.artisfaction.com/transparent_png/Trans_PNG.zip > > I haven't looked at it yet but the samples work. I think theme developers > could include it if I'm not mistaken. > Cool. We could have it work with imageTag. Matt |
From: Mike W. <wi...@ce...> - 2003-05-01 14:03:49
|
Hey remember that IE doesn't support transparent png's using alpha channel transparency? Well someone has written a php script that will detect the browser and add a specific filter and make it work. Here is the link http://www.artisfaction.com/transparent_png/ or you can download it directly at http://www.artisfaction.com/transparent_png/Trans_PNG.zip I haven't looked at it yet but the samples work. I think theme developers could include it if I'm not mistaken. winzor |
From: Matthew M. <ma...@tu...> - 2003-05-01 14:01:02
|
Update: Found some repeaters. Some old code that need fixin'. Matt |
From: Matthew M. <ma...@tu...> - 2003-05-01 13:16:14
|
Update: I have added another variable to the cache config file. Setting GLOBAL_CACHE to TRUE will create a global variable that will store that page's cache calls. Information in that array will be returned instead of accessing the database. If you prefer to always use the database, setting this to FALSE will allow it. If you prefer not to use caching, turn it off. If you prefer not to use page caching (caching templates instead of accessing the files) you can turn this off as well. Matt |
From: Matthew M. <ma...@tu...> - 2003-05-01 12:45:47
|
Some of the reasons you are seeing all these extra SQL calls is that we received another warning a few months ago. That warning was that we were using far too much memory. So we reduced the dependance on the GLOBALS array. For example, the Cache used to store the information in the GLOBALS array so it would not have to be called more than once. This was removed to reduced the size of the GLOBALS array. Now the DB is called each time. So the question is, which is it? Do we want to depend upon the database each time to get our information? Or do you want offload some of the work by storing results in GLOBALS? Now that we know that classes eat up most of the memory, we may decide to place some data back and reduce DB calls. Matt |
From: Matthew M. <ma...@tu...> - 2003-05-01 12:14:09
|
> Hey all. > > I had the weirdest dream... I will run the same test today and see if I can eliminate some duplicates. Matt |
From: Don S. <do...@se...> - 2003-05-01 12:06:58
|
While yes that is disturbing, I thought we were trying to cut down on memory usage? Or do you mean store them in memory just for that page load and then destroy them? Don. On Thu, 1 May 2003, Eloi George wrote: > Hey all. > > I had the weirdest dream. At one point I'm riding a bicycle (badly) through > the surf & this narrator kept repeating over and over something about every > time a query is received the mySQL server has to parse, optimise, build > tables, access, analyze & report data. > > When I woke up, I trundled over to my system & inserted this line in > database.php @line 92: > echo $sql.'<br />'; > > What I saw next really troubled me. > > My 0.91cvs testbed homepage queried the server 1,061 times! I next called > up an Announce article > (http://www.realvidreams.com/testbed/index.php?module=announce&ANN_user_op=v > iew&ANN_id=42) and the query count dropped to a still hefty 462 times! > > I could understand if the server was busy pulling up relevant data, but a > lot of the queries were duplicates! Take this for instance: > > select * from 4_modules where mod_title = 'calendar' > > Did that really need to be done 63 times to create 1 homepage? This was > almost rivalled by: > > select * from 4_cache where mod_title = 'calendar' and id = > '4124aabad14bfcc1d0d0b8840b98b0b1' > which showed up 29 times! > > MenuMan was another area of concern. If we need to build a tree it would be > better to load all data into memory, assemble the relationships and > immediately unset() whatever data we don't need. Especially if your SQL > server is on a different machine or (Oh God, No!) behind an ODBC driver. > That method would also cut down significantly on the 206 queries that were > generated. > > The cache table was queried 717 times. Of that, stuff was selected 120 > times, inserted 149 times, & deleted 299 times. My sleep-addled brain > didn't want to find out what happened on the remaining 149 queries. Would > phpWS still work if it wrote to the cache -after- it finished working with > all the data? > > Menuman & Calendar seem to be the biggest culprits, but I'm also seeing > duplicates of queries like these: > select * from 4_modules where mod_title = 'fatcat' > select * from 4_modules where mod_title = 'comments' > where just doing a global SELECT and storing the values in memory can reduce > the query count by 74. > > All this leads me to believe that phpWS's performance problems are more due > to excessive database usage than classes. > > -Eloi- > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Phpwebsite-developers mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwebsite-developers > > > |
From: Eloi G. <el...@re...> - 2003-05-01 06:50:47
|
Hey all. I had the weirdest dream. At one point I'm riding a bicycle (badly) through the surf & this narrator kept repeating over and over something about every time a query is received the mySQL server has to parse, optimise, build tables, access, analyze & report data. When I woke up, I trundled over to my system & inserted this line in database.php @line 92: echo $sql.'<br />'; What I saw next really troubled me. My 0.91cvs testbed homepage queried the server 1,061 times! I next called up an Announce article (http://www.realvidreams.com/testbed/index.php?module=announce&ANN_user_op=v iew&ANN_id=42) and the query count dropped to a still hefty 462 times! I could understand if the server was busy pulling up relevant data, but a lot of the queries were duplicates! Take this for instance: select * from 4_modules where mod_title = 'calendar' Did that really need to be done 63 times to create 1 homepage? This was almost rivalled by: select * from 4_cache where mod_title = 'calendar' and id = '4124aabad14bfcc1d0d0b8840b98b0b1' which showed up 29 times! MenuMan was another area of concern. If we need to build a tree it would be better to load all data into memory, assemble the relationships and immediately unset() whatever data we don't need. Especially if your SQL server is on a different machine or (Oh God, No!) behind an ODBC driver. That method would also cut down significantly on the 206 queries that were generated. The cache table was queried 717 times. Of that, stuff was selected 120 times, inserted 149 times, & deleted 299 times. My sleep-addled brain didn't want to find out what happened on the remaining 149 queries. Would phpWS still work if it wrote to the cache -after- it finished working with all the data? Menuman & Calendar seem to be the biggest culprits, but I'm also seeing duplicates of queries like these: select * from 4_modules where mod_title = 'fatcat' select * from 4_modules where mod_title = 'comments' where just doing a global SELECT and storing the values in memory can reduce the query count by 74. All this leads me to believe that phpWS's performance problems are more due to excessive database usage than classes. -Eloi- |
From: Don S. <do...@se...> - 2003-04-30 21:10:22
|
phpwsListings is a PHPWebSite (>= 0.9.1) module that allows a site admin to run a listings site for virtually any type of item, from houses to cars to books. Admins can set the fields and field types, and all fields are searchable. phpwsListings 0.2.0 includes many bug fixes. Notable feature additions include the listing class which allows the site to list more than one type of item. Price field is now optional as well. It is STRONGLY recommended that you read the INSTALL instruction in the docs directory if you are upgrading from 0.2.0. The upgrade itself is painless, but the note about the default class is important to know. phpwsListings can be downloaded from the Files section of http://phpwslistings.sourceforge.net. |
From: Jeremy A. <ja...@tu...> - 2003-04-28 15:42:39
|
This should be correct. I have run conversion on our sites under the same conditions. You should be able to upgrade straight from 0.8.2 to 0.9.x also. I just can not say this with 100% certainty, but it should work. Just a little note on conversion. If you get odd errors first look at the old DB. Sometimes a bad record will make it in and this will cause trouble. Removing the problem(bad record) and reconverting will fix it. > Just writing to confirm that I can upgrade an 0.8.3 site to 0.9.1 > directly, and that I don't have to first upgrade to 0.9.0. > > Holla back. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Phpwebsite-developers mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwebsite-developers > -- Jeremy Agee phpWebSite Development Team (http://phpwebsite.appstate.edu) Appalachian State University SF.net id: jagee or 94756 |
From: Don S. <do...@se...> - 2003-04-25 21:35:59
|
Just writing to confirm that I can upgrade an 0.8.3 site to 0.9.1 directly, and that I don't have to first upgrade to 0.9.0. Holla back. |
From: Don S. <do...@se...> - 2003-04-24 14:15:24
|
Just an FYI to anyone interested that last night we released phpwsListings 0.2.0 RC 2. Fixed some bugs found since RC1, as well as cleaned up the update process. Feel free to download and install (requires phpWebSite 0.9.1) and let us know what you think. http://phpwslistings.sf.net Don. |
From: Don S. <do...@se...> - 2003-04-24 02:40:00
|
Wondering how I can force my module's "Manager" class to reload itself, or at least make calls the various load functions after the module is upgraded to the latest version. For now I just print a message asking the admin to log out and back in. Basically I've tried making calls to $_SESSION["SES_LISTINGS_MANAGER"] or redefining it. I do that from my update.php script but it doesn't seem to want to work, as I get errors about not being able to find the item class definition. Just wondering what you guys recommend. Don. |
From: Don S. <do...@se...> - 2003-04-22 21:09:27
|
Is there a way to use a normal href tag to submit a form without using javascript? Or is using javascript such a bad thing? I want to have a form in a menu block but the submit buttons are so hugh it's ugly. Don. |