Menu
▾
▴
phpwebsite-developers — For our development team.
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(265) |
Apr
(166) |
May
(25) |
Jun
(17) |
Jul
(20) |
Aug
(47) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(66) |
Dec
(64) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(109) |
Feb
(64) |
Mar
(34) |
Apr
(23) |
May
(64) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(33) |
Oct
(272) |
Nov
(67) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(264) |
Feb
(244) |
Mar
(171) |
Apr
(119) |
May
(54) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(51) |
Aug
(48) |
Sep
(14) |
Oct
(49) |
Nov
(47) |
Dec
(15) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(27) |
Mar
(18) |
Apr
(44) |
May
(35) |
Jun
(24) |
Jul
(39) |
Aug
(142) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(24) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(60) |
Feb
(71) |
Mar
(19) |
Apr
(27) |
May
(68) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(23) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(13) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(46) |
Mar
(64) |
Apr
(18) |
May
(16) |
Jun
(37) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(19) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(23) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(25) |
Feb
(21) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(36) |
May
(12) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
|
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(3) |
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Richard S. <ri...@ri...> - 2003-06-03 15:34:25
|
I really don't like the fact that the person has to be an admin in order to use the allow_access() function on them. On my module I'm working on, I have users that are just users and don't administer anything but yet I need to give them certain permissions on what they can and cant do. In order for me to check their permissions I have to make them administrators??? Doesn't make logically sense for me??? Best Regards, Richard S. On Tuesday, June 3, 2003, at 07:01 AM, ad...@tu... wrote: > Matt matt...you know I ask for features all the time. It doesn't mean > you > should listen to me :) Just kidding...I remember the request now and > our > conversation about it and you're right it is a needed feature. I'm > wondering if we should change the wording or something to make it more > intuitive as to it's function. Tell me what you think. > > Adam > >>> Matt: Is there another reason the admin flag exists that I'm just >>> missing? >> >> Funny you should mention this Adam. Back around a year and a half ago >> you >> personally asked for this feature. =) >> >> The thinking was that it would allow an admin to instantly turn an >> admin >> into a user (in case they did something bad) or just so permissions >> could >> be set without actual admin priviledges. >> >> I have no problem removing it, but I think these are important >> concerns. >> >> What do you think? >> >> Matthew McNaney >> Internet Systems Architect >> Electronic Student Services >> Appalachian State University >> Phone: 828-262-6493 >> phpwebsite.appstate.edu >> ess.appstate.edu >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay >> Get office equipment for less on eBay! >> http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 >> _______________________________________________ >> Phpwebsite-developers mailing list >> Php...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwebsite-developers >> > > > -- > Adam Morton > Developer - Electronic Student Services > http://phpwebsite.appstate.edu > Founder - Appalachian Linux Users Group > http://alug.appstate.edu > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay > Get office equipment for less on eBay! > http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 > _______________________________________________ > Phpwebsite-developers mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwebsite-developers > > |
|
From: <ad...@tu...> - 2003-06-03 14:01:07
|
Matt matt...you know I ask for features all the time. It doesn't mean you should listen to me :) Just kidding...I remember the request now and our conversation about it and you're right it is a needed feature. I'm wondering if we should change the wording or something to make it more intuitive as to it's function. Tell me what you think. Adam >> Matt: Is there another reason the admin flag exists that I'm just >> missing? > > Funny you should mention this Adam. Back around a year and a half ago you > personally asked for this feature. =) > > The thinking was that it would allow an admin to instantly turn an admin > into a user (in case they did something bad) or just so permissions could > be set without actual admin priviledges. > > I have no problem removing it, but I think these are important concerns. > > What do you think? > > Matthew McNaney > Internet Systems Architect > Electronic Student Services > Appalachian State University > Phone: 828-262-6493 > phpwebsite.appstate.edu > ess.appstate.edu > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay > Get office equipment for less on eBay! > http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 > _______________________________________________ > Phpwebsite-developers mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwebsite-developers > -- Adam Morton Developer - Electronic Student Services http://phpwebsite.appstate.edu Founder - Appalachian Linux Users Group http://alug.appstate.edu |
|
From: Matthew M. <ma...@tu...> - 2003-06-03 12:48:10
|
> Matt: Is there another reason the admin flag exists that I'm just missing? Funny you should mention this Adam. Back around a year and a half ago you personally asked for this feature. =) The thinking was that it would allow an admin to instantly turn an admin into a user (in case they did something bad) or just so permissions could be set without actual admin priviledges. I have no problem removing it, but I think these are important concerns. What do you think? Matthew McNaney Internet Systems Architect Electronic Student Services Appalachian State University Phone: 828-262-6493 phpwebsite.appstate.edu ess.appstate.edu |
|
From: <ad...@tu...> - 2003-06-03 12:40:37
|
Any user you want to give even the slightest admin privlages to any module needs to be an admin. All other users are simply users. I wonder if the "admin" flag could be eliminated all together and if the user has any permissions assigned to them, it would simply allow the access to the modules. Matt: Is there another reason the admin flag exists that I'm just missing? Adam >> > Does the allow access take into consideration the group permissions? >> >> Yes, a user inherits all the group permissions of which they are a >> member. > > However they do have to be an admin. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay > Get office equipment for less on eBay! > http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 > _______________________________________________ > Phpwebsite-developers mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwebsite-developers > -- Adam Morton Developer - Electronic Student Services http://phpwebsite.appstate.edu Founder - Appalachian Linux Users Group http://alug.appstate.edu |
|
From: Don S. <do...@se...> - 2003-06-03 03:54:26
|
I figured it out. The image directory I was passing in to imageForm() didn't exist (I had forgot to add the mkdir() to my install.php). Perhaps imageForm should print some sort of notice? Or does the phpWebSite Debugger do this stuff? I'm not familiar with it at all. Don. On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Don Seiler wrote: > I'm unable to get the imageForm() function of EZform to output anything. > I haven't been able to find an example module that uses it yet. I know > that the tags produced will have NEW_, CURRENT_, and REMOVE_ prepended to > the name I pass in, but still no dice. > > Don. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay > Get office equipment for less on eBay! > http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 > _______________________________________________ > Phpwebsite-developers mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwebsite-developers > > > |
|
From: Don S. <do...@se...> - 2003-06-03 03:37:13
|
I'm unable to get the imageForm() function of EZform to output anything. I haven't been able to find an example module that uses it yet. I know that the tags produced will have NEW_, CURRENT_, and REMOVE_ prepended to the name I pass in, but still no dice. Don. |
|
From: Don S. <do...@se...> - 2003-06-03 03:32:48
|
When passing an empty array into the ezform add, none of the form elements
are printed. Example code might be:
...
$teams = array();
$result = $GLOBALS["core"]->sqlSelect("mod_leaguesite_teams", NULL, NULL, "teamcity,teamname");
if($result)
foreach ($result as $row)
$teams[$row["id"]] = $row["teamcity"] . " " . $row["teamname"];
$form = new EZform("mystuff_edit");
$form->add("team_id", "select", $teams);
...
If there are no teams in the mod_leaguesite_teams table, $result will be
null. If that is the case then the $teams array will be empty, and when
that happens none of the form elements for $form are printed at all. all
the other text boxes and whatever kind of fields are just not printed. I
can understand maybe not printing the select box, but rest of the form
elements should at least still be printed.
I got around it by adding a blank option which I wanted anyway right after
the array creation:
$teams = array();
$teams[] = NULL;
So now I get at least an empty select box. Probably not the most
beautiful but oh well.
|
|
From: Eloi G. <el...@re...> - 2003-06-02 17:22:04
|
> > Does the allow access take into consideration the group permissions? > > Yes, a user inherits all the group permissions of which they are a member. However they do have to be an admin. |
|
From: Matthew M. <ma...@tu...> - 2003-06-02 12:01:51
|
> Does the allow access take into consideration the group permissions? Yes, a user inherits all the group permissions of which they are a member. Matthew McNaney Internet Systems Architect Electronic Student Services Appalachian State University Phone: 828-262-6493 phpwebsite.appstate.edu ess.appstate.edu |
|
From: Matthew M. <ma...@tu...> - 2003-06-02 12:00:30
|
> For other languages it seems like kinda sloppy thing to do but in PHP I > thought it was fine. So in PHPWS 9.3 those will be gone? We'll see. In many cases it seems sloppy to keep a session running just in case another module needs it. We want to eliminate that. 0.9.3 will be backward compatible in many respects, but we would like to phase things out as we go onward. Matthew McNaney Internet Systems Architect Electronic Student Services Appalachian State University Phone: 828-262-6493 phpwebsite.appstate.edu ess.appstate.edu |
|
From: Richard S. <ri...@ri...> - 2003-06-02 09:31:44
|
Eh, never-mind, I found it in the devdoc :-X On Monday, June 2, 2003, at 01:47 AM, Richard Sumilang wrote: > Does the allow access take into consideration the group permissions? > Say for instance I create a group that can edit and delete stuff from > my module. Then I create a user in that group I just created with none > of the module permissions checked, would that user have the > permissions of editing and deleting stuff since the group has it or > not? I would try it myself but I my module isn't that far developed > yet ;-) > > Thanks, > Richard S. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay > Get office equipment for less on eBay! > http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 > _______________________________________________ > Phpwebsite-developers mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwebsite-developers > > |
|
From: Richard S. <ri...@ri...> - 2003-06-02 08:47:57
|
Does the allow access take into consideration the group permissions? Say for instance I create a group that can edit and delete stuff from my module. Then I create a user in that group I just created with none of the module permissions checked, would that user have the permissions of editing and deleting stuff since the group has it or not? I would try it myself but I my module isn't that far developed yet ;-) Thanks, Richard S. |
|
From: Richard S. <ri...@ri...> - 2003-06-02 00:29:29
|
For other languages it seems like kinda sloppy thing to do but in PHP I thought it was fine. So in PHPWS 9.3 those will be gone? I'm going to miss them and have to restructure some code :-\. At any rate, cheers and keep up the great work! Best Regards, - Richard S. On Saturday, May 31, 2003, at 08:14 AM, Matthew McNaney wrote: > Richard: > > Yes, I liked using it too. However for the sake of standards (and > possible > security), we dumped it for the GLOBALS array. > > In the future, we want to think about not using SESSIONS or GLOBALS at > all. What I mean is that you the developer should not have to worry if > a > variable is declared or if a session is created. I am finding the whole > GLOBALS theme variable thing tedious and sloppy. > > So "$GLOBALS['core']" will turn into "core::" (or more likely > PHPWS_Text::, PHPWS_DB::, etc.). $_SESSION['translate'] would be > PHPWS_Translate:: and so on. It should not be incumbent upon to the > module > developer to remember session names and the like. > > We will talk more about these changes down the road in the developer > chatroom and here of course. In the end though 0.9.3 is going to blow > away > 0.9.2. > > Matt > >> I don't know about reasons why. Security perhaps. But definitely get >> used to using $GLOBALS["core"]. >> Don. > >>> It seems like the $core object is missing from version 9.2? I really >>> liked using $core on some pages like the index file just because it >>> is >>> less typing although I can type for myself a reference for it >>> ($core=&$GLOBALS['core']) which takes up no extra memory. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay > Get office equipment for less on eBay! > http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 > _______________________________________________ > Phpwebsite-developers mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwebsite-developers > > |
|
From: Richard S. <ri...@ri...> - 2003-06-02 00:18:28
|
This is for Matt but anyone may feel free to answer... 1) What are the set of functions needed to be used to create a group like the example you gave me to create a user? Also how to return back that group id? 2) What are the set of functions needed to be used to edit a user and edit a group? 3) What is the function to delete a group? (I think I can figure this one out but just incase I don't :-) ) Thank's a lot! - Richard S. |
|
From: Richard S. <ri...@ri...> - 2003-06-02 00:13:26
|
No, I was looking for $user->getUserId(); which Matt answered. Thanks :-) On Saturday, May 31, 2003, at 11:34 AM, Eloi George wrote: >> Great! Is there a function for returning the users' id that was just >> created as well? > > What do you mean, something other than $newId = > $user->getUserId($username)? > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay > Get office equipment for less on eBay! > http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 > _______________________________________________ > Phpwebsite-developers mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwebsite-developers > > |
|
From: Eloi G. <el...@re...> - 2003-05-31 19:02:42
|
> Great! Is there a function for returning the users' id that was just > created as well? What do you mean, something other than $newId = $user->getUserId($username)? |
|
From: Matthew M. <ma...@tu...> - 2003-05-31 15:24:20
|
Richard: Yes, I liked using it too. However for the sake of standards (and possible security), we dumped it for the GLOBALS array. In the future, we want to think about not using SESSIONS or GLOBALS at all. What I mean is that you the developer should not have to worry if a variable is declared or if a session is created. I am finding the whole GLOBALS theme variable thing tedious and sloppy. So "$GLOBALS['core']" will turn into "core::" (or more likely PHPWS_Text::, PHPWS_DB::, etc.). $_SESSION['translate'] would be PHPWS_Translate:: and so on. It should not be incumbent upon to the module developer to remember session names and the like. We will talk more about these changes down the road in the developer chatroom and here of course. In the end though 0.9.3 is going to blow away 0.9.2. Matt > I don't know about reasons why. Security perhaps. But definitely get > used to using $GLOBALS["core"]. > Don. >> It seems like the $core object is missing from version 9.2? I really >> liked using $core on some pages like the index file just because it is >> less typing although I can type for myself a reference for it >> ($core=&$GLOBALS['core']) which takes up no extra memory. |
|
From: Don S. <do...@se...> - 2003-05-31 07:12:44
|
I don't know about reasons why. Security perhaps. But definitely get used to using $GLOBALS["core"]. $core didn't work in some scripts in 0.9.1 also, that's when I got in the habit of using the GLOBALS instead. Don. On Fri, 30 May 2003, Richard Sumilang wrote: > It seems like the $core object is missing from version 9.2? I really > liked using $core on some pages like the index file just because it is > less typing although I can type for myself a reference for it > ($core=&$GLOBALS['core']) which takes up no extra memory. Is there a > reason why this variable was removed? > > Regards, > > Richard S. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay > Get office equipment for less on eBay! > http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 > _______________________________________________ > Phpwebsite-developers mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwebsite-developers > > > |
|
From: Richard S. <ri...@ri...> - 2003-05-31 07:05:42
|
It seems like the $core object is missing from version 9.2? I really liked using $core on some pages like the index file just because it is less typing although I can type for myself a reference for it ($core=&$GLOBALS['core']) which takes up no extra memory. Is there a reason why this variable was removed? Regards, Richard S. |
|
From: Richard S. <ri...@ri...> - 2003-05-30 18:16:11
|
Great! Is there a function for returning the users' id that was just created as well? On Friday, May 30, 2003, at 08:55 AM, Matthew McNaney wrote: > Use this instead: > > $user = new PHPWS_User; > $user->setUsername($username); > $user->setPassword($password); // do not hash it > $user->setEmail($email); > $user->setAdmin(TRUE); // or FALSE > $user->setDeity(TRUE); // or FALSE > $user->save(); > > > Matthew McNaney > Internet Systems Architect > Electronic Student Services > Appalachian State University > Phone: 828-262-6493 > phpwebsite.appstate.edu > ess.appstate.edu > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay > Get office equipment for less on eBay! > http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 > _______________________________________________ > Phpwebsite-developers mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwebsite-developers > > |
|
From: Matthew M. <ma...@tu...> - 2003-05-30 16:02:00
|
Use this instead: $user = new PHPWS_User; $user->setUsername($username); $user->setPassword($password); // do not hash it $user->setEmail($email); $user->setAdmin(TRUE); // or FALSE $user->setDeity(TRUE); // or FALSE $user->save(); Matthew McNaney Internet Systems Architect Electronic Student Services Appalachian State University Phone: 828-262-6493 phpwebsite.appstate.edu ess.appstate.edu |
|
From: Richard S. <ri...@ri...> - 2003-05-30 08:08:30
|
Here's the function I wrote that's not working...
function createNewUser($userInfo){
=09
if(is_array($_POST))
$_POST=3Darray_merge($_POST, $userInfo);
else
$_POST=3D$userInfo;
=09
$_SESSION["newUser"] =3D new PHPWS_User;
$_SESSION["newUser"]->userAction("add");
=09
} =09
=00=00
On Friday, May 30, 2003, at 12:31 AM, Richard Sumilang wrote:
> I'm trying to use $_SESSION['OBJ_user']->userAction("add") to add the=20=
> posted values into the database through my own user creation form=20
> however I keep getting the error below.
>
> /************************************************/
>
> DB Error: no database selected
> select * from mod_users where email =3D 'ea...@ds...' [nativecode=3D =
** ]
>
> /************************************************/
>
> Anyone have any idea why or should I be using another function to=20
> create user's manually?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Richard S.
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay
> Get office equipment for less on eBay!
> http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5
> _______________________________________________
> Phpwebsite-developers mailing list
> Php...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwebsite-developers
>
>
|
|
From: Richard S. <ri...@ri...> - 2003-05-30 07:31:50
|
I'm trying to use $_SESSION['OBJ_user']->userAction("add") to add the
posted values into the database through my own user creation form
however I keep getting the error below.
/************************************************/
DB Error: no database selected
select * from mod_users where email = 'ea...@ds...' [nativecode= ** ]
/************************************************/
Anyone have any idea why or should I be using another function to
create user's manually?
Thanks,
Richard S.
|
|
From: Don S. <do...@se...> - 2003-05-24 04:55:00
|
Can the manager class only list one type of item? I ask because I had been working a mod that I wanted to have about 5 different items. I thought this was possible since $lists was an array. However the Manager constructor needs to call setTable(), which looks like it will only take one table name. Or should I just re-call setTable() in each of my various list functions? What I think might be necessary is to tie the lists defined in $lists to the classes, rather than the tables. Anyway let me know if I can list the multiple items otherwise I'll need to start over with the old way. And I know that photoalbum has multiple items but it only lists one, so that example really doesn't apply to me. Don. |
|
From: George B. <gbr...@lu...> - 2003-05-24 01:02:33
|
Hi, I'm working on my module, jobman, in CVS using the latest phpwebsite-full CVS as a testing environment. Jobman has an administrative interface where jobs get listed, added, deleted, and edited. But it also has an interface for users, who can simply view the list as well as details of individual jobs in the list. When I install jobman in the current CVS with the new controlpanel.php file, the admin access works fine with an icon, name and description. But how do users call up the list? Some modules put their user interface in My Settings, but that makes no sense for a list of jobs. Is a menu item or an embedded link somewhere the only way for a user (not an admin) to access the list of jobs? The old Modules interface provided a list of modules accessible to users, including content modules as well as settings modules. But the Control Panel (a) doesn't do that and (b) doesn't sound right doing it. We're talking about content, not control. Thanks for any feedback! George ______________________________________ George Brackett, Principal George Brackett Associates 617 413 4316 / gbr...@lu... http://www.luceatlux.com/gba/ |
5 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
