Re: [Phpslash-devel] RC2: Block-admins parentage
Brought to you by:
joestewart,
nhruby
From: Joe S. <joe...@us...> - 2003-02-12 16:48:09
|
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 04:06:09PM +0000, Peter Cruickshank wrote: > At 09:35 12/02/03 -0600, Joe Stewart wrote: > >On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 11:02:16AM +0000, Peter Cruickshank wrote: > >> > >> A snippet from Block_admin.class: > > <snip> > > >> > >> Shouldnt this last line be $this->Block_i()? or does Block_admin extend Block? Or is something tricksy going on? > >> > > > >Okay, I'm still hampered by cold medicine so not able to think too > >clearly :) > > > >It seems to be a little sloppiness on my part. When Block_admin was split > >off from Block_i it looks like the constructor was cut and pasted instead > >of restructuring it to call the Block_i constructor. > > > >Probably the admin templates could be trimmed from Block_i and this->psl > >only should be in Block.class? > > Yeah, that's what I've done in my Back-End converted version. I've also changed listblocktypes() to use the same templ object - needed templ->set_var(...'rows') changed to ...'addrows'. > Okay take a look at the changes: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/phpslash/phpslash-ft/class/Block_admin.class.diff?r1=1.7&r2=1.8 http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/phpslash/phpslash-ft/class/Block_admin.class.diff?r1=1.7&r2=1.8 > I hope you feel better soon :-) > I think so but keep a close eye on the code :) > P > > |