phpicalendar-devel — Mailing list for PHP iCalendar Developers

[PHPiCalendar-DEV] 0.9.5 security issue

[Mike T. <mt...@ya...>]

I haven't looked closely, but isn't publish.php a security hole, especially since adding authentication to the calendars folder isn't mentioned in the Readme?
 
thanks,
mike


---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now

Re: [PHPiCalendar-DEV] Templating system

[Scott H. <sco...@ko...>]

I third the recommendation for Smarty.

Scott

>Hi All..
>
>On 19. nov 2003, at 12:37, Wesley Miaw wrote:
>
>>Just looking between Smarty and phemplate, I'd=20
>>have to say Smarty looks more feature complete,=20
>>more powerful, and more flexible. I haven't=20
>>used either of these, but at the simplest level=20
>>they both perform the same variable=20
>>substitution. It's just that Smarty seems to=20
>>support much more if and when you need it.
>
>I have to agree with this...
>
>____________________________________________
>Jakob Peterh=E4nsel
>Technical Engineer
>Tel: +45 7022 1014
>Fax: +45 7022 1013
>Mob: +45 22 68 49 61
>jp...@ne...
>www.NetPoint.com
>
>
>
>Content-Type: image/tiff;
>	x-unix-mode=3D0666;
>	name=3D"image.tiff"
>Content-Disposition: inline;
>	filename=3Dimage.tiff
>
>Attachment converted: houchin:image.tiff (TIFF/JFAX) (00030453)
>
>
>The information contained in this message is confidential or protected by l=
aw.
>If you are not the intended recipient, please=20
>contact the sender and delete this message. Any=20
>unauthorised copying of this message or=20
>unauthorised distribution of the information=20
>contained herein is prohibited.
>
>
>
>Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature;
>	name=3Dsmime.p7s
>Content-Disposition: attachment;
>	filename=3Dsmime.p7s
>
>Attachment converted: houchin:smime.p7s (????/----) (00030454)

Re: [PHPiCalendar-DEV] Templating system

[Marook Z. K. <ma...@cr...>]

Hi All..

On 19. nov 2003, at 12:37, Wesley Miaw wrote:

> Just looking between Smarty and phemplate, I'd have to say Smarty 
> looks more feature complete, more powerful, and more flexible. I 
> haven't used either of these, but at the simplest level they both 
> perform the same variable substitution. It's just that Smarty seems to 
> support much more if and when you need it.

I have to agree with this...

____________________________________________
Jakob Peterhänsel
Technical Engineer
Tel: +45 7022 1014
Fax: +45 7022 1013
Mob: +45 22 68 49 61
jp...@ne...
www.NetPoint.com

Re: [PHPiCalendar-DEV] Event popup patch

[Chad <ch...@ch...>]

Thanks Patrick,

I've added this to CVS, and modified it to support URL. I've also  
cleaned up event.php a bit with less code and some much needed  
functions. I want to also modify it to support Todo's, and just use one  
event popup for either.

Cheers,
Chad

On Nov 18, 2003, at 1:00 PM, Patrick Bourke wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Since I've submitted my first patch to the project, I suppose I'll  
> stop lurking on the dev list ;).
>
> The patch is meant to deal with a bug we've noticed in event popups.  
> We have some users entering a lot of text in event descriptions. The  
> following calendar is where we first noticed the bug (be warned, this  
> page is huge):
>
> http://pcowles.sherpasuite.com/Instant_Coffee_-_Toronto/month.php? 
> cal=calendar&getdate=20031118
>
> (try clicking on the WAVELENGTH event on 29 Nov.)
>
> The current popup mechanism won't work in IE for events with a long  
> description (I've tested IE 6 and 5 on XP and 2000).
>
> The patch that I submitted creates a hidden form in header.inc.php  
> that is populated when an event link is clicked. The form is submitted  
> via POST, so it should be able to handle "Moby Dick", if people decide  
> to enter it as a description :). The link for the patch is:
>
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? 
> func=detail&aid=844677&group_id=62270&atid=500019
>
> Thanks for a great project, folks. Keep up the great work!
>
> -- 
> Patrick Bourke,
> Software Developer
> Semaview, Inc. | http://www.semaview.com
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
> Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
> help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
> YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> _______________________________________________
> Phpicalendar-devel mailing list
> Php...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpicalendar-devel

Re: [PHPiCalendar-DEV] 0.9.5 in CVS

[Chad <ch...@ch...>]

Ok, I'm just getting these emails today? Is sourceforge having issues 
with mailman as well?

It was set as intended for the shipping version (0).

-C

On Nov 17, 2003, at 11:51 AM, Robert Prouse wrote:

> Another problem with 0.9.5, at the beginning of init.inc.php, the line
>
> error_reporting (E_ALL);
>
> which is for debugging only, is uncommented.
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
> Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
> help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
> YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> _______________________________________________
> Phpicalendar-devel mailing list
> Php...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpicalendar-devel

Re: [PHPiCalendar-DEV] bug report in french version 0.9.4

[Mike <mi...@la...>]

Yvan Oberson wrote :

> In french.inc.php of languages folder,
> I change this line; it works better in french !
>
> $all_cal_comb_lang =3D 'Tous les calendriers combinés';



I wrote 'Tous les calendriers' to avoid long menu size width.
It means the same, and is already quite clear in my opinion.

Also, since this version, all the non-ascii letters are now in UTF-8 (=20=

no more " é " but " =E9 " )

Best regards, Mike.
http://www.LaShampoo.net

Re: [PHPiCalendar-DEV] 1.0 release is Dec. 2!

[Wesley M. <we...@we...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Chad,

> 6) Username/password calendar access. (wesley) Can you add it to cvs 
> and I'll tidy it up?

Will do. Shouldn't be too difficult since I've already got my 
login-enabled version synchronized with the repository.
- --
Wesley Miaw, Wesley Miaw Consulting
http://www.wesman.net/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)

iD8DBQE/u+06Qv4agqRAk2kRAoq4AJ9z2ycNkePTi2006MBh4gpGVm//ZgCdFxwQ
JsPHKAIfzgD96y5A7Qi1sC4=
=RG8v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [PHPiCalendar-DEV] publishing from iCal

[Chad <ch...@ch...>]

Hi Dietrich,

Can you take a look at this on SourceForge?

https://sourceforge.net/tracker/? 
func=detail&atid=500017&aid=845351&group_id=62270

Thanks!
Chad

On Nov 12, 2003, at 10:15 PM, Dietrich Ayala wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> Great work on the PHP iCalendar. Really slick interface.
>
> I wrote an extension that allows publishing of calendars from iCal to  
> PHP iCalendar. Just drop the script in your calendars dir, modify  
> permissions and you're publishing.
>
> Features:
> - publishing
> - deletion (unpublishing)
> - some logging capability for troubleshooting
>
> The script is available here:
> http://dietrich.ganx4.com/calendar/publish.php.gz
>
> Installation and usage notes are in the script. Would you be  
> interested in adding it to PHP iCalendar?
>
> Also, is there any work being done to support todo items and alerts?
>
> -dietrich
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
> 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest
> developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL,
> WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Phpicalendar-devel mailing list
> Php...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpicalendar-devel

[PHPiCalendar-DEV] 1.0 release is Dec. 2!

[Chad <ch...@ch...>]

So after some talk with Patrick, we've decided that the next release 
(due Dec 2) will be 1.0. I'm very happy with 0.9.5 and the next release 
will be good enough for 1.0. Please do your best to test out whats in 
cvs. I will be adding some new features with this release.

1) Redo popup engine (mostly done). The popup is now based on a 
javascript submitting a form, the true calendar name also display with 
it.

2) URI support (not started). Another new addition to the master array, 
this will display on the popup under location.

3) Zero bugs. (mostly done). We've put a call out for all bug reports.

4) Display bugs (not started). There are a few display bugs that I've 
got a good idea how to fix when dealing with erased events.

5) Code cleanup. I will do some minimal cleanup, as I don't want to 
induce new bugs.

6) Username/password calendar access. (wesley) Can you add it to cvs 
and I'll tidy it up?


After 1.0, a new branch will be added to sourceforge for 2.0. We'll 
keep 1.0 around as our 4.0 browser fallback and will only do releases 
if there are things to be fixed in ical_parser.php.

Thanks!
Chad

Re: [PHPiCalendar-DEV] PHP iCalendar 0.9.5a

[Wesley M. <we...@we...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I was wondering if you might be interested in adding username/password 
calendar access to 1.0b as a toggled feature. It's working great for me 
when I want to keep some calendars public versus private.

On Nov 18, 2003, at 8:10 PM, Chad wrote:

> 1.0 beta:
>
> An actual templating system.
> Able to handle long descriptions (past 1024 chars).
> URL support.
> Calendar grouping.
> Show which calendar in calendar popup.
> New Website.
> Better documentation.
> Gracefully use CSS to cut down code, but still support 4.0 browsers in 
> some way.
> And whatever 'Feature Requests' I can convince people to work on from 
> SourceForge.
- --
Wesley Miaw, Wesley Miaw Consulting
http://www.wesman.net/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)

iD8DBQE/u1b1Qv4agqRAk2kRAlb6AJ9PxV5vrVHSrUDhWoNMFrA8O2C5BwCeMcwx
BsoNx56XO0coeSg6iiHKsKQ=
=Dn7w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [PHPiCalendar-DEV] Templating system

[Wesley M. <we...@we...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Just looking between Smarty and phemplate, I'd have to say Smarty looks 
more feature complete, more powerful, and more flexible. I haven't used 
either of these, but at the simplest level they both perform the same 
variable substitution. It's just that Smarty seems to support much more 
if and when you need it.

http://smarty.php.net/manual/en/

On Nov 18, 2003, at 8:24 PM, Chad wrote:

> Patrick and I are looking at templating systems for use in PHP 
> iCalendar. My. personal favorite right now is phemplate:
>
> http://pukomuko.esu.lt/phemplate/
>
> Basically it needs to be small (one page preferable) and robust enough 
> for our needs. What other templating systems have you used and which 
> would you recommend?
- --
Wesley Miaw, Wesley Miaw Consulting
http://www.wesman.net/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)

iD8DBQE/u1YFQv4agqRAk2kRAmjYAJwNpUd5boR+Ch0MdPNMif/I6lN1nACeLBjP
kzfQkTFSRQsKGeVulAqbiRQ=
=EOkU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[PHPiCalendar-DEV] Re: Phpicalendar-devel digest, Vol 1 #126 - 2 msgs

[Alex T. K. <ale...@ya...>]

You must have considered Smarty and decided against
it?

--Alex

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree

Re: [PHPiCalendar-DEV] Templating system

[Patrick C. <pa...@ic...>]

We may also want to roll our own, given the complexity of our 
requirements and the need to keep things lightweight.

Best,
Patrick Crowley
Creator, iCalShare
iCalShare - Share Your iCalendars!
http://iCalShare.com

On Nov 18, 2003, at 8:24 PM, Chad wrote:

> Patrick and I are looking at templating systems for use in PHP 
> iCalendar. My. personal favorite right now is phemplate:
>
> http://pukomuko.esu.lt/phemplate/
>
> Basically it needs to be small (one page preferable) and robust enough 
> for our needs. What other templating systems have you used and which 
> would you recommend?
>
> -C
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
> Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
> help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
> YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> _______________________________________________
> Phpicalendar-devel mailing list
> Php...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpicalendar-devel
>

[PHPiCalendar-DEV] Templating system

[Chad <ch...@ch...>]

Patrick and I are looking at templating systems for use in PHP 
iCalendar. My. personal favorite right now is phemplate:

http://pukomuko.esu.lt/phemplate/

Basically it needs to be small (one page preferable) and robust enough 
for our needs. What other templating systems have you used and which 
would you recommend?

-C

[PHPiCalendar-DEV] Templating system

[Chad L. <cl...@ap...>]

Patrick and I are looking at templating systems for use in PHP 
iCalendar. My. personal favorite right now is phemplate:

http://pukomuko.esu.lt/phemplate/

Basically it needs to be small (one page preferable) and robust enough 
for our needs. What other templating systems have you used and which 
would you recommend?

-C

[PHPiCalendar-DEV] PHP iCalendar 0.9.5a

[Chad <ch...@ch...>]

I've never done this before but now seems like a good time. I want to 
update 0.9.5 with a newer version without changing version numbers. I 
believe this is called slipstream? Anyways, I've fixed a few tiny bugs 
and one big one as well as updated a few languages. Since 0.9.5 is 
still new, I will simply upload a new package in its place.

Now would be the time to re-test the package before I do this. I want 
to do it by Thursday at the latest. This will be the last release 
before 1.0 beta, and probably the last release for a while. 0.9.5 only 
had one parser bug reported thus far, making it a good candidate to be 
our main release for a while.

1.0 beta:

An actual templating system.
Able to handle long descriptions (past 1024 chars).
URL support.
Calendar grouping.
Show which calendar in calendar popup.
New Website.
Better documentation.
Gracefully use CSS to cut down code, but still support 4.0 browsers in 
some way.
And whatever 'Feature Requests' I can convince people to work on from 
SourceForge.

Templating is going to present an interesting challenge. I'd like to 
see if I can get Drei (who wrote the overlapping code) to help me 
moving that over to a template system somehow.

Attached is the new ical_parser (1.129) for testing.

[PHPiCalendar-DEV] Event popup patch

[Patrick B. <pb...@se...>]

Hi all,

Since I've submitted my first patch to the project, I suppose I'll stop 
lurking on the dev list ;).

The patch is meant to deal with a bug we've noticed in event popups. We 
have some users entering a lot of text in event descriptions. The 
following calendar is where we first noticed the bug (be warned, this 
page is huge):

http://pcowles.sherpasuite.com/Instant_Coffee_-_Toronto/month.php?cal=calendar&getdate=20031118

(try clicking on the WAVELENGTH event on 29 Nov.)

The current popup mechanism won't work in IE for events with a long 
description (I've tested IE 6 and 5 on XP and 2000).

The patch that I submitted creates a hidden form in header.inc.php that 
is populated when an event link is clicked. The form is submitted via 
POST, so it should be able to handle "Moby Dick", if people decide to 
enter it as a description :). The link for the patch is:

https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=844677&group_id=62270&atid=500019

Thanks for a great project, folks. Keep up the great work!

-- 
Patrick Bourke,
Software Developer
Semaview, Inc. | http://www.semaview.com

Re: Re[2]: [PHPiCalendar-DEV] Standards-compliant Windows Calendars

[Robert P. <rp...@se...>]

Alex,

Tell us a bit more about your organization and your requirements and maybe 
we can help you out.  We are looking to solve many of the problems with 
producing and sharing calendars, so it would be great to learn more about 
your needs.  We could also talk about getting your entire organization 
using the software as a use-case study to make sure we solve your problems.

Rob

At 08:50 PM 17/11/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>I'd like it if my organization too could be included in the testing.
>the email my PC using counterpart used was "jde...@ms..." We're
>trying to get a calendar solution up based on the format, and she's in
>charge of generating the files, but clueless when she downloaded
>mozilla.
>
>I'm excited for your product, will help promote it on our site when
>it's released!!
>---Alex

Re: [PHPiCalendar-DEV] 0.9.5 in CVS

[Rob P. <php...@pr...>]

That is good to know, although it does make it hard for us to help you test 
these releases without you posting a release candidate :(  It looks like 
the updates are in CVS this morning.  3 days lag is a bit of a pain.

Maybe in the future, we should hold releases until anonymous CVS catches 
up, then you can have the benefit of those of us on the list giving it a 
proper going over before the release :)

Rob

At 04:07 PM 17/11/2003 -0800, you wrote:
>Sourceforge lately has had ongoing issues with web-based cvs and
>anonymous cvs. It's my understanding that they are working on these
>issues and developer access is the only fully working (proper) access.
>I was under the assumption that all of these issues were fixed, but I
>really haven't looked anymore into it since access for myself has been
>100%.
>
>I do tag and export every release, so phpicalendar-0-9-5 should be in
>there. Anything I marked closed did make it into this release. :-)

[PHPiCalendar-DEV] CVS Anonymous Access

[Alex T. K. <ale...@ya...>]

CVS Anonymous Access is somewhat notorious (from what
I understand) for lagging behind what is actually
current. We see this in WordPress (a project I
contribute on that is hosted on SourceForge) too.

--Alex

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree

Re: Re[2]: [PHPiCalendar-DEV] Standards-compliant Windows Calendars

[Alex J. <al...@ph...>]

Rob-

I'd like it if my organization too could be included in the testing.  
the email my PC using counterpart used was "jde...@ms..." We're  
trying to get a calendar solution up based on the format, and she's in  
charge of generating the files, but clueless when she downloaded  
mozilla.

I'm excited for your product, will help promote it on our site when  
it's released!!
---Alex

On Monday, November 17, 2003, at 01:39  PM, Alex Ezell wrote:

> On Friday, November 14, 2003, 3:44:43 PM, Rob wrote:
>
>> All you have to do is ask and you might just become an "invited"  
>> tester :P
>
> Rob,
> I would love to be included on the next round of testers. It would
> help me greatly to be certain that the ICS files I am creating are
> standardized.
>
> Not to mention that Sherpa looks like it will be really nice to use.
>
> --  
> Alex
> http://www.spittingllamas.com
> "Formal Restrictions, contrary to what you might think,
> free you up by allowing you to concentrate on purer ideas."
>  - Winter Sorbeck in Chip Kidd's The Cheese Monkeys
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC
> GoToMyPC is the fast, easy and secure way to access your computer from
> any Web browser or wireless device. Click here to Try it Free!
> https://www.gotomypc.com/tr/OSDN/AW/Q4_2003/t/g22lp?Target=mm/ 
> g22lp.tmpl
> _______________________________________________
> Phpicalendar-devel mailing list
> Php...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpicalendar-devel
>

Re: [PHPiCalendar-DEV] 0.9.5 in CVS

[Chad L. <ch...@ch...>]

Sourceforge lately has had ongoing issues with web-based cvs and  
anonymous cvs. It's my understanding that they are working on these  
issues and developer access is the only fully working (proper) access.  
I was under the assumption that all of these issues were fixed, but I  
really haven't looked anymore into it since access for myself has been  
100%.

I do tag and export every release, so phpicalendar-0-9-5 should be in  
there. Anything I marked closed did make it into this release. :-)

SourceForge Status:
http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=2352&group_id=1

On Nov 17, 2003, at 12:41 PM, Rob Prouse wrote:

> I have checked the web interface to CVS on Sourceforge and the files I  
> see jibe with the files I have checked out, not with what was  
> released.
>
> Rob
>
> At 03:30 PM 17/11/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>> Chad,
>>
>> I did not check release version of PHP iCal, I checked what is in the  
>> repository.  The version of calendar_nav.php that you released has my  
>> patches (pretty much), but the version in the repository does not.  I  
>> guess you have not checked in what you released since many files  
>> differ?  Or maybe anonymous CVS on Sourceforge comes from a not up to  
>> date mirror?  For example, CVS shows me the latest version of  
>> calendar_nav.php is 1.13, checked in on 5 Nov.  The repository is  
>> also not tagged with the 0.9.5 release.
>>
>> Sorry if I sounded a bit snappy in the last email, but it had me a  
>> bit worried.  I am curious as to what's up.  We have several  
>> developers here with anonymous checkouts of the code and none of us  
>> are seeing what is in the 0.9.5 release.  If Sourceforge is having  
>> problems with mirrors then people should be aware of that.  If it is  
>> just that the latest code is not checked in, then that is cool, we  
>> just need to know.
>>
>> Rob
>>
>> At 11:39 AM 17/11/2003 -0800, you wrote:
>>> I specifically tested 0.9.5 on WinXP, IE 6 and did not see that  
>>> error.
>>> Im also now looking through the code and do not see a double select
>>> anywhere? BBEdit also does not return any errors. I'm sitting here
>>> looking in IE, Safari, ect and I still do not see it, either in CVS  
>>> or
>>> in the released version I just downloaded.
>>>
>>> --Chad
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC
>> GoToMyPC is the fast, easy and secure way to access your computer from
>> any Web browser or wireless device. Click here to Try it Free!
>> https://www.gotomypc.com/tr/OSDN/AW/Q4_2003/t/g22lp?Target=mm/ 
>> g22lp.tmpl
>> _______________________________________________
>> Phpicalendar-devel mailing list
>> Php...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpicalendar-devel
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC
> GoToMyPC is the fast, easy and secure way to access your computer from
> any Web browser or wireless device. Click here to Try it Free!
> https://www.gotomypc.com/tr/OSDN/AW/Q4_2003/t/g22lp?Target=mm/ 
> g22lp.tmpl
> _______________________________________________
> Phpicalendar-devel mailing list
> Php...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpicalendar-devel

Re[2]: [PHPiCalendar-DEV] Standards-compliant Windows Calendars

[Alex E. <ta...@sp...>]

On Friday, November 14, 2003, 3:44:43 PM, Rob wrote:

> All you have to do is ask and you might just become an "invited" tester :P

Rob,
I would love to be included on the next round of testers. It would
help me greatly to be certain that the ICS files I am creating are
standardized.

Not to mention that Sherpa looks like it will be really nice to use.

-- 
Alex
http://www.spittingllamas.com
"Formal Restrictions, contrary to what you might think,
free you up by allowing you to concentrate on purer ideas."
 - Winter Sorbeck in Chip Kidd's The Cheese Monkeys

Re: [PHPiCalendar-DEV] 0.9.5 in CVS

[Rob P. <php...@pr...>]

I have checked the web interface to CVS on Sourceforge and the files I see 
jibe with the files I have checked out, not with what was released.

Rob

At 03:30 PM 17/11/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>Chad,
>
>I did not check release version of PHP iCal, I checked what is in the 
>repository.  The version of calendar_nav.php that you released has my 
>patches (pretty much), but the version in the repository does not.  I 
>guess you have not checked in what you released since many files 
>differ?  Or maybe anonymous CVS on Sourceforge comes from a not up to date 
>mirror?  For example, CVS shows me the latest version of calendar_nav.php 
>is 1.13, checked in on 5 Nov.  The repository is also not tagged with the 
>0.9.5 release.
>
>Sorry if I sounded a bit snappy in the last email, but it had me a bit 
>worried.  I am curious as to what's up.  We have several developers here 
>with anonymous checkouts of the code and none of us are seeing what is in 
>the 0.9.5 release.  If Sourceforge is having problems with mirrors then 
>people should be aware of that.  If it is just that the latest code is not 
>checked in, then that is cool, we just need to know.
>
>Rob
>
>At 11:39 AM 17/11/2003 -0800, you wrote:
>>I specifically tested 0.9.5 on WinXP, IE 6 and did not see that error.
>>Im also now looking through the code and do not see a double select
>>anywhere? BBEdit also does not return any errors. I'm sitting here
>>looking in IE, Safari, ect and I still do not see it, either in CVS or
>>in the released version I just downloaded.
>>
>>--Chad
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC
>GoToMyPC is the fast, easy and secure way to access your computer from
>any Web browser or wireless device. Click here to Try it Free!
>https://www.gotomypc.com/tr/OSDN/AW/Q4_2003/t/g22lp?Target=mm/g22lp.tmpl
>_______________________________________________
>Phpicalendar-devel mailing list
>Php...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpicalendar-devel

Re: [PHPiCalendar-DEV] 0.9.5 in CVS

[Robert P. <ro...@pr...>]

I have checked the web interface to CVS on Sourceforge and the files I see 
jibe with the files I have checked out, not with what was released.

Rob

At 03:30 PM 17/11/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>Chad,
>
>I did not check release version of PHP iCal, I checked what is in the 
>repository.  The version of calendar_nav.php that you released has my 
>patches (pretty much), but the version in the repository does not.  I 
>guess you have not checked in what you released since many files 
>differ?  Or maybe anonymous CVS on Sourceforge comes from a not up to date 
>mirror?  For example, CVS shows me the latest version of calendar_nav.php 
>is 1.13, checked in on 5 Nov.  The repository is also not tagged with the 
>0.9.5 release.
>
>Sorry if I sounded a bit snappy in the last email, but it had me a bit 
>worried.  I am curious as to what's up.  We have several developers here 
>with anonymous checkouts of the code and none of us are seeing what is in 
>the 0.9.5 release.  If Sourceforge is having problems with mirrors then 
>people should be aware of that.  If it is just that the latest code is not 
>checked in, then that is cool, we just need to know.
>
>Rob
>
>At 11:39 AM 17/11/2003 -0800, you wrote:
>>I specifically tested 0.9.5 on WinXP, IE 6 and did not see that error.
>>Im also now looking through the code and do not see a double select
>>anywhere? BBEdit also does not return any errors. I'm sitting here
>>looking in IE, Safari, ect and I still do not see it, either in CVS or
>>in the released version I just downloaded.
>>
>>--Chad
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC
>GoToMyPC is the fast, easy and secure way to access your computer from
>any Web browser or wireless device. Click here to Try it Free!
>https://www.gotomypc.com/tr/OSDN/AW/Q4_2003/t/g22lp?Target=mm/g22lp.tmpl
>_______________________________________________
>Phpicalendar-devel mailing list
>Php...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpicalendar-devel