|
From: Bob S. <bo...@pr...> - 2001-03-23 00:42:02
|
Yeah, that un-created profiles thing can be a major hassle. I believe I documented this issue in the doc/USING file, but who reads docs anyway? Most of the docs in there have not been kept uptodate with some changes, but for the most part they still work. As far as other bugs not already mentioned (customers, profiles, etc) I am not aware of anything in particular. We have been using it where I work since about October of last year. Our "production" server is still running 0.9.4, but I have a parallel version of 0.9.9p1 installed for testing and even a 0.9.10pre18 version on a new server I am setting up (Timetrack doesn't work at all with the 0.9.10 series). I did make one recent custom change to our production server recently, which I will probably also make available in time. It was mainly an edit to the jobslist.php page to remove the SUM(jd.num_hours) cross join in the query for displaying the number of hours worked on a job in this list, and added a total report to the details link, changing the text of the "Num Hours" with "Details". The reason for this was that with our current data having a total number of jobs over 300, and about 3000 job_detail records, the response time to display this page was getting quite pathetic on our current server. I suppose the best way to implement this would be a config option so you could decide to display totals there or not. I have a bunch of "todo" items for new features scribbled on paper here and there, I really need to sit down and bring them all together. I would say the biggest bug then is the lack of additional features, most notable of which require the use of other backend database tools (my favorite is phpMyAdmin) for correcting mistakes which do not yet have methods internal to timetracker, like deleting jobs, changing a job number, etc, plus there is no current method to export data, we still resort to manually printing out the timesheets each week to turn them in. Someone else had also submitted a patch recently to me which also deals with the customers page, I truthfully have not even had time yet to look at either of them. Hopefully this weekend. Bob Schader ----- Original Message ----- From: <ti...@xi...> To: <php...@li...> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 5:28 PM Subject: RE: [Phpgwtimetrack-developers] companies.php questions. > > I got a notice from sourceforge on the patch you submitted, > > haven't had time to look at it yet, and now it looks like > > sourceforge is down. Anyway, I currently do not plan on > > making updates to CVS for the 099 compatible version, as > > I will probably use CVS to concentrate on 0.9.10 > > compatibility when I can get to it. I(we) can still provide > > updates to the 099 release through patches and file releases. > > As far as I can see, there aren't any other major problems with > the 099 version - my boss is quite keen to start using it now. If we > make any updates, I'll keep the list posted. If I have a chance I'll > be looking at the user editing to add blank profiles automatically - > took me quite a while to work out why setting changes weren't > happening. Are there any other bugs to work on? > > That won't be immediate, tho, since I've still got lots to do getting the > rest of phpGW going cleanly. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Phpgwtimetrack-developers mailing list > Php...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpgwtimetrack-developers > |