phpgedview-talk Mailing List for PhpGedView (Page 23)
Brought to you by:
canajun2eh,
yalnifj
You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(5) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(35) |
Apr
(37) |
May
(22) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
|
Dec
(16) |
2005 |
Jan
(16) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(48) |
Apr
(12) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(19) |
Sep
(31) |
Oct
(16) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(58) |
2006 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(14) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(12) |
May
(9) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(31) |
Aug
(19) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(3) |
2007 |
Jan
(16) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(40) |
Jun
(14) |
Jul
(31) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(14) |
Oct
(64) |
Nov
(24) |
Dec
(13) |
2008 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(16) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2009 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(11) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(6) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2022 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Michael C. <mca...@ny...> - 2005-12-06 04:28:39
|
John, Files that start with a . are OK. I have played with the .htaccess file enough to be sure it is there. There are a bunch of file in phpGedView in the ISR folder (ISR is inside places) that have \ in them. Cheers, Michael |
From: John F. <Joh...@ne...> - 2005-12-06 00:01:43
|
Hi Michael, There shouldn't be any files with \ or / in their names (operating systems won't allow you to create files with those characters in their names). I wasn't sure what a 553 error was, so I did some googling and found this: https://mail.fukt.bth.se/pipermail/crux/2005-May/004809.html It looks like your host does not allow files which start with a "." period. There are a few files in the PGV releases that start with a ".": .cvsignore .htaccess Includes/.htaccess Index/.htaccess The apache webserver looks for .htaccess files for settings and we include some files for convenience. Just erase the files that start with a . --John -----Original Message----- From: php...@li... [mailto:php...@li...] On Behalf Of Michael Calleia Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 4:45 PM To: php...@li... Subject: [Phpgedview-talk] file names with \ Hi, I am still getting a 553 Prohibited file name when trying to install =20 3.3.7 as well. My server company says file names with a \ as big no-no. What can I do? I can not imagine this is the only company with an =20 issue about \ Cheers, Michael ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D7637&alloc_id=3D16865&op=3Dclick _______________________________________________ Phpgedview-talk mailing list Php...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpgedview-talk |
From: Michael C. <mca...@ny...> - 2005-12-05 23:45:10
|
Hi, I am still getting a 553 Prohibited file name when trying to install 3.3.7 as well. My server company says file names with a \ as big no-no. What can I do? I can not imagine this is the only company with an issue about \ Cheers, Michael |
From: Michael C. <mca...@ny...> - 2005-11-30 13:08:34
|
Hi, I am currently running phpGedView version 3.2. While trying to upgrade to 3.3.5 I ran into a problem while uploading the files, I got the following error: 553 Prohibited file name: /public_html/phpGedView/places/IRS/IRS_\204 \216\024o\22#2D9B18.txt It appear a number of the file names are prohibited. Any ideas why and what I can do? Cheers, Michael |
From: <jgi...@t-...> - 2005-11-30 01:58:19
|
Hello NG How can I delete a child from the family A and then insert in family B? Reason: the child was assigned to the wrong family. Many thanks for the help Josef |
From: John F. <Joh...@ne...> - 2005-11-29 22:56:11
|
In version 3.3.x you will have to do some editing of the raw GEDCOM to accomplish this. 1. Go to the record of the child you want to move 2. Click edit raw gedcom record 3. Find the 1 FAMC @F###@ line and replace the old id with the ID of the family you want that person to be in... for example 1 FAMC @F101@ 4. Go to the record for the old family 5. Edit the raw gedcom record 6. Find the 1 CHIL @I###@ line with the ID to the INDI you want to remove and remove that line from the record 7. Go to the record for the new family 8. Edit the raw gedcom record 9. Add a new 1 CHIL @I###@ line to link the family back to the child In version 4.0 there is a new change family members option on the family page which will allow you to do this. --John -----Original Message----- From: php...@li... [mailto:php...@li...] On Behalf Of jgi...@t-... Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 1:40 PM To: php...@li... Subject: Re: [Phpgedview-talk] I must change a child to another family Hello John, John Finlay wrote on 29.11.2005 19:47: >=20 > Which version of PhpGedView are you using? >=20 phpgedview 3.3.5 Josef ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D7637&alloc_id=3D16865&op=3Dclick _______________________________________________ Phpgedview-talk mailing list Php...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpgedview-talk |
From: <jgi...@t-...> - 2005-11-29 20:40:57
|
Hello John, John Finlay wrote on 29.11.2005 19:47: > > Which version of PhpGedView are you using? > phpgedview 3.3.5 Josef |
From: John F. <Joh...@ne...> - 2005-11-29 18:49:25
|
Hi Josef, Which version of PhpGedView are you using? --John -----Original Message----- From: php...@li... [mailto:php...@li...] On Behalf Of jgi...@t-... Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 8:32 AM To: Mailing-Liste PHPGedView Subject: [Phpgedview-talk] I must change a child to another family Hello NG How can I delete a child from the family A and then insert in family B? Reason: the child was assigned to the wrong family. Many thanks for the help Josef ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D7637&alloc_id=3D16865&op=3Dclick _______________________________________________ Phpgedview-talk mailing list Php...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpgedview-talk |
From: <jgi...@t-...> - 2005-11-29 18:46:44
|
Hello NG How can I delete a child from the family A and then insert in family B? Reason: the child was assigned to the wrong family. Many thanks for the help Josef |
From: Megan <me...@ti...> - 2005-11-22 23:45:38
|
Hi As a new user, I am quite impressed with how easy it was to get phpGedView up and running. It looked lovely and had all the options I needed for visitors to view my genealogy However, I had a bit of problem with my server which resulted in me having to reinstall my entire website. When I finally got phpGedView installed and working again, I find I can not see any of the blocks on the Welcome page, and I am at a loss to find them anywhere on the site. Where can I find the blocks to configure the Welcome page and how do I use or edit them? Regards, Megan me...@ti... |
From: waldo k. <wki...@al...> - 2005-10-28 00:30:22
|
Roger Winget wrote: > On 25/Oct/2005 20:00 waldo kitty wrote .. > >>there should also be some way to indicate who the parents are without requiring >>a marriage between them... however, i don't know that a dataformat is where >>that stickywicket should be taken care of... > > > The answer is simple. Create a family element with a "type" attribute. Type could > be married, cohabitional (sp?), or single (something that the parents did not live > together). that does appear that it would work for XML stuffs but not for others ;) i've had a few entries of similar nature that i've had to make over the years in several geneology programs... needless to say, 15+ years ago, we had to fake a marriage... over time, it has gotten better in those programs that i've used over the years... in most all cases, the problem has come down to the basic premise that children are born within a marriage and those writting the programs have forgotten about "wild sown seed" O:) -- _\/ (@@) Waldo Kitty, Waldo's Place USA __ooO_( )_Ooo_____________________ telnet://bbs.wpusa.dynip.com _|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____ http://www.wpusa.dynip.com ____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____ ftp://ftp.wpusa.dynip.com _|_Eat_SPAM_to_email_me!_YUM!__|_____|_____ wkitty42 -at- alltel.net --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0543-2, 10/27/2005 Tested on: 10/27/05 8:30:03 PM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2005 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com |
From: Roger W. <gen...@wi...> - 2005-10-27 01:49:02
|
On 25/Oct/2005 20:00 waldo kitty wrote .. > there should also be some way to indicate who the parents are without requiring > a marriage between them... however, i don't know that a dataformat is where > that stickywicket should be taken care of... The answer is simple. Create a family element with a "type" attribute. Type could be married, cohabitional (sp?), or single (something that the parents did not live together). aloha, Roger |
From: waldo k. <wki...@al...> - 2005-10-26 02:00:18
|
Roger Winget wrote: > In this politically correct world, any new XML format should allow 2 moms or 2 dads as well at least... > as a single parent within a family. Also on the note of families, the XML format should > allow us to indicate the relationship of a child to a family (ie biological, adopted). there should also be some way to indicate who the parents are without requiring a marriage between them... however, i don't know that a dataformat is where that stickywicket should be taken care of... -- _\/ (@@) Waldo Kitty, Waldo's Place USA __ooO_( )_Ooo_____________________ telnet://bbs.wpusa.dynip.com _|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____ http://www.wpusa.dynip.com ____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____ ftp://ftp.wpusa.dynip.com _|_Eat_SPAM_to_email_me!_YUM!__|_____|_____ wkitty42 -at- alltel.net --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0543-1, 10/25/2005 Tested on: 10/25/05 10:00:07 PM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2005 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com |
From: Alex R. <sh...@gr...> - 2005-10-25 20:41:47
|
Roger, Thanks for the feedback! On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 13:41 -0600, Roger Winget wrote: > I've looked over the sample XML file ( http://www.gramps-project.org/file= s/data.gramps ) > and have a few comments. >=20 > Your major tags have both an id and handle. Just stick with one. This is our existing format, and here's why we're using both at the moment. The "handle" is the unique ID assigned by GRAMPS. It will never be changed for a given person. The "id" is the user-visible ID that can be changed, either manually (discouraged) or by re-ordering the IDs from program tool. We're using both for the sake of backward compatibility with the earlier GRAMPS formats. This does not have to be the case for the general cross-software format. What I envision for the more general format is that there will be a single user-visible ID and possibly many software-specific IDs: <person id=3D"I0001"> <uid source=3D"gramps" id=3D"_AKSD23234KHK432JH"/> <uid source=3D"phpgedview" id=3D"0234-lkj"/> <uid source=3D"ftm" id=3DFTM0123-P012"/> blah </person> This way the unique IDs assigned by any program that processed the data can be kept, without affecting either the user-visible IDs or each other. > I think given and surname are better labels than first and last as some c= ultures > reverse the order of names. I would suggest a fullname tag or attribute t= hat shows > all the name parts in the correct order. >=20 > I suggest making change into its own tag that allows us to specify WHO ma= de the change, > not just the date of the last change. Agreed. > Date fields should accept partial dates, and should support BC. This is already supported: <dateval val=3D"1897" type=3D"about"/> Supported are: about, before, after, between A and B, from A to B, estimated, calculated, as well as dates with missing day or month, as well as the textual dates ("Christmas before John was born") and BC. We should probably make a separate example featuring all supported dates, I won't list the XML here. > In this politically correct world, any new XML format should allow 2 moms= or 2 dads as well > as a single parent within a family. Also on the note of families, the XM= L format should > allow us to indicate the relationship of a child to a family (ie biologic= al, adopted). A missing "father" or "mother" tag would be a single parent. The "mother" and "father" can be any gender, so 2 female parents or 2 male parents are supported. The relationship of child to a family is already recorded. The default is birth (biological) and is omitted in XML. But if it's anything else then: <childof hlink=3D"_S7MT6D1JSGX9PZO27F" mrel=3D"Stepchild" frel=3D"Adopte= d"/> where relationship to father (frel) and mother (mrel) do not have to be the same. > I would clean up the tag and attribute names a bit, but overall it's a gr= eat start. Thanks! The question I would like to ask is whether there is interest outside GRAMPS to support similar XML format for data exchange. We are happy with using this format, and keep adjusting it as we add new features and fix bugs. It seems that the wider genealogical community could benefit from having a documented and extensible format that would be: 1. improving GEDCOM's shortcomings 2. community-supported: not tied to any single organization, church, etc 3. naturally extensible: X in XML :-) 4. supported by numerous XML tools: parsing, validation, transformations= , etc So while we definitely welcome the feedback on our format, we'd like to collaborate with other genealogical software developers to develop something common that we all can natively support. Sorry for being redundant :-) Alex --=20 Alexander Roitman http://www.gramps-project.org |
From: Roger W. <gen...@wi...> - 2005-10-25 19:42:04
|
Alex, I've looked over the sample XML file ( http://www.gramps-project.org/files/data.gramps ) and have a few comments. Your major tags have both an id and handle. Just stick with one. I think given and surname are better labels than first and last as some cultures reverse the order of names. I would suggest a fullname tag or attribute that shows all the name parts in the correct order. I suggest making change into its own tag that allows us to specify WHO made the change, not just the date of the last change. Date fields should accept partial dates, and should support BC. In this politically correct world, any new XML format should allow 2 moms or 2 dads as well as a single parent within a family. Also on the note of families, the XML format should allow us to indicate the relationship of a child to a family (ie biological, adopted). I would clean up the tag and attribute names a bit, but overall it's a great start. aloha, Roger |
From: Alex R. <sh...@gr...> - 2005-10-25 01:34:33
|
John, Thanks for your response! On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 17:01 -0600, John Finlay wrote: > The first thing that popped in my head when I read this email was if you > had looked at any of the other XML standards for genealogy such as > XgenML or GEDCOM v6? Would it be better to look at one of those that > others also support?=20 Nobody supports those. GEDCOM 6 is abandoned unfinished, and a variety of the proposed XML formats are nothing but words. Our format has been working for many users for some years now. In fact, it was our primary format up to last year. > On the other hand if gramps actually exports data > in an XML format (I don't know of other programs that do) then is there > any reason to switch to another standard? We are happy with our format, but we're looking for a broader format to enable lossless transfer between different software. GEDCOM has numerous limitations, leading to the data loss on import/export with most software. XML is a very appealing choice for such an open format, and since we already have an XML genealogical format, we thought that maybe we will start from there, if anybody else is interested :-) > PhpGedView uses GEDCOM as its base data model, so in order for PGV to > support importing XML it would have to translate the XML back into > GEDCOM at least for now. I see. This can already be done. All programs including GRAMPS can write into GEDCOM. The data gets lost, however. > In the future, the goal is to have the data > abstract enough that it could be stored in an XML format. Maybe a good > place to start would be an XML export from PGV that could then be > imported into gramps. >=20 > Anytime you do a translation, there is going to be some data loss. That > is why PGV stores data in raw GEDCOM format. We don't lose anything > trying to convert gedcom into an internal data model. But we there > would probably still be some data loss in the translation from gedcom to > XML. I guess my point is that we'd like to have a better format than GEDCOM, not convert to and from GEDCOM. Converting back and forth makes any new exchange format meaningless. > I think that this type of collaboration between projects would be a good > thing. I also think that we can get something going sooner than the > commercial software can. >=20 > Is there any documentation about your XML standard that we can read up > on? This page has formal documentation: DTD and RELAX NG schema: http://www.gramps-project.org/xml/1.0.0/ The example data file can be found here: http://www.gramps-project.org/files/data.gramps It's actually very self-explanatory. If you're still interested then we should definitely work on this. If something in GRAMPS format does not seem reasonable, we can discuss it and change it in the new format. But ultimately, I think XML is a much better choice for a common ground between different software, for a number of reasons. If OpenDocument could do it for the word processing, why can't we do it with genealogy? Alex --=20 Alexander Roitman http://www.gramps-project.org |
From: John F. <Joh...@ne...> - 2005-10-24 23:03:54
|
Hi Alex, The first thing that popped in my head when I read this email was if you had looked at any of the other XML standards for genealogy such as XgenML or GEDCOM v6? Would it be better to look at one of those that others also support? On the other hand if gramps actually exports data in an XML format (I don't know of other programs that do) then is there any reason to switch to another standard? PhpGedView uses GEDCOM as its base data model, so in order for PGV to support importing XML it would have to translate the XML back into GEDCOM at least for now. In the future, the goal is to have the data abstract enough that it could be stored in an XML format. Maybe a good place to start would be an XML export from PGV that could then be imported into gramps. Anytime you do a translation, there is going to be some data loss. That is why PGV stores data in raw GEDCOM format. We don't lose anything trying to convert gedcom into an internal data model. But we there would probably still be some data loss in the translation from gedcom to XML. I think that this type of collaboration between projects would be a good thing. I also think that we can get something going sooner than the commercial software can. Is there any documentation about your XML standard that we can read up on? Thanks, --John -----Original Message----- From: php...@li... [mailto:php...@li...] On Behalf Of Alex Roitman Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 3:46 PM To: php...@li... Cc: Don Allingham Subject: [Phpgedview-talk] XML genealogy format Hello, I am a member of the development team of GRAMPS, a personal desktop genealogy program that is Free/Open source. We are constantly facing problems of supporting users who come with their data in GEDCOM format created by various software. The limitations of the GEDCOM format are preventing the lossless data transfer between the programs. Different programs are extending the GEDCOM standard in different ways and these extensions are sometimes hard to learn about. We would like to develop an open XML genealogy data format. We have an existing XML data format that used to be our primary format. Lately we switched to using BSDDB for storage, but we still maintain our XML for transferring data between the versions. We feel that this format would be a good starting point for developing cross-application XML format for genealogy. We know that similar attempts were done before and did not get anywhere. However, our situation is better than most, because we already have a working implementation and it is not just the proposal. We would like to invite the phpgedview developers to collaborate with us on developing such a format. It seems that we should be able to find common language with fellow Free software developers sooner than those of commercial software. While we realize that GEDCOM is a de-facto standard, however poor it is, we would be thrilled if the phpgedview developers were interested in adding support for our format and/or giving us feedback on the format it would be great. If you might be interested in collaborating on this, please let us know. You may either reply to me personally, to this list, or post to our list at gra...@li... whatever works for you. Thanks in advance, Alex --=20 Alexander Roitman http://www.gramps-project.org |
From: Alex R. <sh...@gr...> - 2005-10-21 21:46:31
|
Hello, I am a member of the development team of GRAMPS, a personal desktop genealogy program that is Free/Open source. We are constantly facing problems of supporting users who come with their data in GEDCOM format created by various software. The limitations of the GEDCOM format are preventing the lossless data transfer between the programs. Different programs are extending the GEDCOM standard in different ways and these extensions are sometimes hard to learn about. We would like to develop an open XML genealogy data format. We have an existing XML data format that used to be our primary format. Lately we switched to using BSDDB for storage, but we still maintain our XML for transferring data between the versions. We feel that this format would be a good starting point for developing cross-application XML format for genealogy. We know that similar attempts were done before and did not get anywhere. However, our situation is better than most, because we already have a working implementation and it is not just the proposal. We would like to invite the phpgedview developers to collaborate with us on developing such a format. It seems that we should be able to find common language with fellow Free software developers sooner than those of commercial software. While we realize that GEDCOM is a de-facto standard, however poor it is, we would be thrilled if the phpgedview developers were interested in adding support for our format and/or giving us feedback on the format it would be great. If you might be interested in collaborating on this, please let us know. You may either reply to me personally, to this list, or post to our list at gra...@li... whatever works for you. Thanks in advance, Alex --=20 Alexander Roitman http://www.gramps-project.org |
From: Gordon S. <go...@tr...> - 2005-10-13 18:10:16
|
Hello, I am running v3.3.6 with Apache v2.0.54 and mod_php 4.4.0 on a Linux box. The machine is an AMD64 with 1 GIG of RAM.The GEDCOM file is 5 MB with roughly 30,000 individuals. MySQL db. I'm getting very unusual memory race problems. If I do something like this: http://forexample.com/phpgeview/individual.php?pid=I07209&ged=Dilbriel%20Digbertged. Notice I've left off the GED extension. File was also upload with a space in it. Hence the %20, however I don't know if that makes a difference. Has anyone else had problems of this nature? Thanks, Gordon |
From: John F. <Joh...@ne...> - 2005-10-12 22:45:11
|
Hi Jubal, A lot of information about this can be found in the forums here: https://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=3D1269926&forum_id=3D18= 516 5 --John -----Original Message----- From: php...@li... [mailto:php...@li...] On Behalf Of Jubal Molina Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 5:11 AM To: php...@li... Subject: Re: [Phpgedview-talk] Places Is there any section on the website where I can lern how to create a place? > This question may have been asked before but I could not find the answer > to it. I would like to create a map of Puerto Rico for the Place > Hierarchy section. I have an image of Puerto Rico divided by counties. I > created a HTML page (PR.htm) with only the map section. I used > dreamweaver to get the coordinates. I added the javascript portion to > each line of the area: > <area href=3D"javascript:setPlaceState('Arecibo(Arecibo)')" > alt=3D"Arecibo" title=3D"Arecibo" = shape=3D"poly" > coords=3D"407,76,404,187,428,175,439,184,442,199,470,194,475,183,492,190,= 5 17,189,532,179,542,156,534,133,540,109,541,93,535,88,518,87,490,94,464,8 1,451,86,433,85,412,79" >>. I Created a text file with the county names called PR.txt. The > island will only have 2 levels PR and the county. What am I doing > wrong? I appreciate any help. Thank you. > > > -- > Jubal > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, > discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > Phpgedview-talk mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpgedview-talk --=20 Jubal ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Phpgedview-talk mailing list Php...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpgedview-talk |
From: <jgi...@t-...> - 2005-10-12 12:45:20
|
Hello, John Finlay wrote on 11.10.2005 23:46: >>>The easiest thing would be to remove the link to the person from the >>>family record by using the raw edit feature and then add the person >>>again. >> >>Also when I try to delete the individual from the family (he is the >>father) I receive the same error info. >> >>greetings Josef > > ... You can add the following lines to your gedcom file just before > the 0 TRLR line and then reimport it: > 0 @I8946@ INDI > 1 NAME Change /Me/ > 1 SEX M > > 0 TRLR That's what I did and now it works again. Thank you very much greetings Josef |
From: Jubal M. <ju...@mo...> - 2005-10-12 11:16:18
|
Is there any section on the website where I can lern how to create a place? > This question may have been asked before but I could not find the answer > to it. I would like to create a map of Puerto Rico for the Place > Hierarchy section. I have an image of Puerto Rico divided by counties. I > created a HTML page (PR.htm) with only the map section. I used > dreamweaver to get the coordinates. I added the javascript portion to > each line of the area: > <area href="javascript:setPlaceState('Arecibo(Arecibo)')" > alt="Arecibo" title="Arecibo" shape="poly" > coords="407,76,404,187,428,175,439,184,442,199,470,194,475,183,492,190,517,189,532,179,542,156,534,133,540,109,541,93,535,88,518,87,490,94,464,81,451,86,433,85,412,79" >>. I Created a text file with the county names called PR.txt. The > island will only have 2 levels PR and the county. What am I doing > wrong? I appreciate any help. Thank you. > > > -- > Jubal > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, > discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > Phpgedview-talk mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpgedview-talk -- Jubal |
From: John F. <Joh...@ne...> - 2005-10-11 21:47:49
|
>> The easiest thing would be to remove the link to the person from the >> family record by using the raw edit feature and then add the person >> again. > Also when I try to delete the individual from the family (he is the=20 > father) I receive the same error info. >=20 > greetings Josef Open your GEDCOM file in a text editor and search for the ID, I8946. My guess is that there is not an individual record for I8946 but there is a reference to it in a family record (1 HUSB @I8946@ or 1 WIFE @I8946@ or 1 CHIL @I8946@). You can add the following lines to your gedcom file just before the 0 TRLR line and then reimport it: 0 @I8946@ INDI 1 NAME Change /Me/ 1 SEX M 0 TRLR You should then be able to edit the individual. --John |
From: <jgi...@t-...> - 2005-10-11 21:20:29
|
Hello John, John Finlay wrote on 11.10.2005 17:55: > Hi Josef, > > Probably what happened is that the individual ID was linked into the > family record but, the actual record itself was not added to the GEDCOM > file. > > The easiest thing would be to remove the link to the person from the > family record by using the raw edit feature and then add the person > again. Also when I try to delete the individual from the family (he is the father) I receive the same error info. greetings Josef |
From: John F. <Joh...@ne...> - 2005-10-11 17:22:13
|
Hi Josef, Probably what happened is that the individual ID was linked into the family record but, the actual record itself was not added to the GEDCOM file. The easiest thing would be to remove the link to the person from the family record by using the raw edit feature and then add the person again. You could also manually add an individual record for the person to the GEDCOM file. --John -----Original Message----- From: php...@li... [mailto:php...@li...] On Behalf Of jgi...@t-... Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 4:52 AM To: Mailing-Liste PHPGedView Subject: [Phpgedview-talk] problem again Hello, I have a new problem. During input an individual my computer stopped and broke the program. Now I have an individual without any data. When I try to change or add=20 data I receive this error info: Access denied You don't have any permission for this. The data protection attitudes prevent that you can work on this data=20 set. You don't have access to pid I8946. Where can I change the protection attitudes? greetings Josef ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Phpgedview-talk mailing list Php...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpgedview-talk |