Menu
▾
▴
phpesp-devel — Discussion of the development of phpESP
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(103) |
Apr
(37) |
May
(45) |
Jun
(49) |
Jul
(55) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(47) |
Oct
(55) |
Nov
(47) |
Dec
(8) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(43) |
Feb
(85) |
Mar
(121) |
Apr
(37) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(33) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(34) |
Sep
(58) |
Oct
(68) |
Nov
(31) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(57) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(26) |
May
(57) |
Jun
(14) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(32) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(12) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(50) |
Apr
(20) |
May
(32) |
Jun
(20) |
Jul
(83) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(32) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(24) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(46) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(12) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(4) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
(22) |
Dec
(19) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(94) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(46) |
May
(20) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(20) |
Sep
(16) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(13) |
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(65) |
May
(15) |
Jun
|
Jul
(24) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(21) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(35) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-03-26 20:55:03
|
Feature Requests item #1868765, was opened at 2008-01-10 13:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by greggmc You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=1868765&group_id=8956 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: survey format Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Franky Van Liedekerke (liedekef) Summary: DB Tables naming convention Initial Comment: Add phpesp_ to all of the tables so I can install this into an existing database and ensure I won't have any conflicting tables already in the table. My Provider only provides one mysql db and I have wordpress and drupal installed in the DB. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Matthew Gregg (greggmc) Date: 2008-03-26 15:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14116 Originator: NO If your 2.0.2->2.0.3 script does the renaming of existing tables then that is what I mean by migrating and we are good. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Franky Van Liedekerke (liedekef) Date: 2008-03-26 15:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=109671 Originator: NO Could you elaborate? If I adjust the update script for 2.0.2->2.0.3 to have the renaming statements in them, and change admin/phpesp.ini.php accordingly, isn't that enough? Anyway, I'm thinking this should all be more automatic ... like a web itf for when db updates need to happen, so you don't need to do this by hand ... Franky ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Matthew Gregg (greggmc) Date: 2008-03-26 14:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14116 Originator: NO It's more involved than renaming current tables, it will need to be a "migration" for existing tables. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Franky Van Liedekerke (liedekef) Date: 2008-03-26 14:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=109671 Originator: NO A reasonable request ... for the next release this can go in, since it only involves renaming the current tables ... Franky ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2008-01-10 16:57 Message: Logged In: NO bishop <ph...@id...> Doesn't the $DB_PREFIX configuration variable address this request? (Of course, you have to go through and manually update the SQL to reflect that prefix.) Or is the request to come out of the box with a phpesp_ prefix, so that the end user doesn't have to care? That sounds like a reasonable default to me, as people who need it will want it and people who don't need it won't care. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=1868765&group_id=8956 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-03-26 20:16:57
|
Feature Requests item #1868765, was opened at 2008-01-10 19:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by liedekef You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=1868765&group_id=8956 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: survey format Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Franky Van Liedekerke (liedekef) Summary: DB Tables naming convention Initial Comment: Add phpesp_ to all of the tables so I can install this into an existing database and ensure I won't have any conflicting tables already in the table. My Provider only provides one mysql db and I have wordpress and drupal installed in the DB. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Franky Van Liedekerke (liedekef) Date: 2008-03-26 21:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=109671 Originator: NO Could you elaborate? If I adjust the update script for 2.0.2->2.0.3 to have the renaming statements in them, and change admin/phpesp.ini.php accordingly, isn't that enough? Anyway, I'm thinking this should all be more automatic ... like a web itf for when db updates need to happen, so you don't need to do this by hand ... Franky ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Matthew Gregg (greggmc) Date: 2008-03-26 20:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14116 Originator: NO It's more involved than renaming current tables, it will need to be a "migration" for existing tables. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Franky Van Liedekerke (liedekef) Date: 2008-03-26 20:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=109671 Originator: NO A reasonable request ... for the next release this can go in, since it only involves renaming the current tables ... Franky ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2008-01-10 22:57 Message: Logged In: NO bishop <ph...@id...> Doesn't the $DB_PREFIX configuration variable address this request? (Of course, you have to go through and manually update the SQL to reflect that prefix.) Or is the request to come out of the box with a phpesp_ prefix, so that the end user doesn't have to care? That sounds like a reasonable default to me, as people who need it will want it and people who don't need it won't care. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=1868765&group_id=8956 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-03-26 19:52:17
|
Feature Requests item #1868765, was opened at 2008-01-10 13:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by greggmc You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=1868765&group_id=8956 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: survey format Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Franky Van Liedekerke (liedekef) Summary: DB Tables naming convention Initial Comment: Add phpesp_ to all of the tables so I can install this into an existing database and ensure I won't have any conflicting tables already in the table. My Provider only provides one mysql db and I have wordpress and drupal installed in the DB. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Matthew Gregg (greggmc) Date: 2008-03-26 14:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14116 Originator: NO It's more involved than renaming current tables, it will need to be a "migration" for existing tables. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Franky Van Liedekerke (liedekef) Date: 2008-03-26 14:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=109671 Originator: NO A reasonable request ... for the next release this can go in, since it only involves renaming the current tables ... Franky ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2008-01-10 16:57 Message: Logged In: NO bishop <ph...@id...> Doesn't the $DB_PREFIX configuration variable address this request? (Of course, you have to go through and manually update the SQL to reflect that prefix.) Or is the request to come out of the box with a phpesp_ prefix, so that the end user doesn't have to care? That sounds like a reasonable default to me, as people who need it will want it and people who don't need it won't care. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=1868765&group_id=8956 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-03-26 19:46:45
|
Feature Requests item #1897639, was opened at 2008-02-20 10:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by liedekef You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=1897639&group_id=8956 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: survey format Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Private: Yes Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: interactive questionnaire Initial Comment: Using phpesp as part of the moodle questionnaire module successfully for questionnaires designed for obese adolescents entering treatment has lead us to a wellknown paradox: the potentially relevant areas of questioning and respective questionnaires far exceeds the total length of the questionnaire tolerated by our patients. We would like to solve this by using one or two screening questions per area that if the answers indicate a problem in this area open a detailed questionnaire. Unfortunately have not been able to identify possibilities to use the current version in such a way. Is it possible to extend the functionality? If necessary we would offer a financial incentive for such an extension as we feel that an intelligent interactive diagnostic instrument could help to individualize the care for obese adolescents in an affordable way. In this package it would be necessary to export all screnning and detail questionnaire results as one csv file for further analysis and display. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Franky Van Liedekerke (liedekef) Date: 2008-03-26 20:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=109671 Originator: NO since conditions cover this already, I'm closing this. Franky ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: bishop (bishopb) Date: 2008-02-20 16:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1982963 Originator: NO Sounds like conditions to me. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Franky Van Liedekerke (liedekef) Date: 2008-02-20 11:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=109671 Originator: NO If I'm not mistaken, this can perfectly be resolved by using conditions on questions, no? Franky ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=1897639&group_id=8956 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-03-26 19:45:53
|
Feature Requests item #1868765, was opened at 2008-01-10 19:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by liedekef You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=1868765&group_id=8956 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: survey format Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Assigned to: Franky Van Liedekerke (liedekef) Summary: DB Tables naming convention Initial Comment: Add phpesp_ to all of the tables so I can install this into an existing database and ensure I won't have any conflicting tables already in the table. My Provider only provides one mysql db and I have wordpress and drupal installed in the DB. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Franky Van Liedekerke (liedekef) Date: 2008-03-26 20:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=109671 Originator: NO A reasonable request ... for the next release this can go in, since it only involves renaming the current tables ... Franky ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2008-01-10 22:57 Message: Logged In: NO bishop <ph...@id...> Doesn't the $DB_PREFIX configuration variable address this request? (Of course, you have to go through and manually update the SQL to reflect that prefix.) Or is the request to come out of the box with a phpesp_ prefix, so that the end user doesn't have to care? That sounds like a reasonable default to me, as people who need it will want it and people who don't need it won't care. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=1868765&group_id=8956 |
|
From: Franky V. L. <lie...@te...> - 2008-03-16 20:13:19
|
On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 15:25:58 -0400 Bishop Bettini <ph...@id...> wrote: > Quoting Matthew Gregg <mat...@gm...>: > > > On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 16:57 +0100, Franky Van Liedekerke wrote: > > I'm not sure of the status of all of Bishops changes. If all of his > > changes are in a completed state then maybe a 2.1 beta should be > > released. Where does that RID show up? > > Everything committed is stable and thoroughly tested. Being banged > on by about 30,000 people now. > > My vote would be for a v2.1 beta, which includes all of my changes > plus rid removal. > > Regards, > bishop > I think I got it for the rid variable, the only changes needed were in public/handler.php, public/handler-prefix.php and public/phpESP.first.php. Check out svn and let me know your thoughts. Now a new issue: I rely on $_REQUEST['sec'] to be "1" to reset rid to 0 (in a session variable). But of course one could spoof $_REQUEST['sec'] as well. So I need to do the same for $_REQUEST['sec'], and put that in a session variable as well. That's for tomorrow :) The html output can keep rid as hidden, since it is usefull for resuming surveys (and this is secure, since resuming works only for authenticated users). Franky |
|
From: Franky V. L. <lie...@te...> - 2008-03-16 19:43:17
|
On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 14:40:53 -0400 Matthew Gregg <mat...@gm...> wrote: > I'm not sure of the status of all of Bishops changes. If all of his > changes are in a completed state then maybe a 2.1 beta should be > released. Where does that RID show up? the RID shows up in every html page rendered. So one could save the html, change the rid and post again, and it would probably overwrite another person their response. Haven't tested it though ... but anyway: putting the RID variable in the session would make it more secure to begin with. I already did the changes, but they need more testing first, since it could pose problems when people are allowed more than one response. The rid should be 0 the first "page" of the survey, and that would solve these problems ... Franky |
|
From: Bishop B. <ph...@id...> - 2008-03-16 19:26:04
|
Quoting Matthew Gregg <mat...@gm...>: > On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 16:57 +0100, Franky Van Liedekerke wrote: > I'm not sure of the status of all of Bishops changes. If all of his > changes are in a completed state then maybe a 2.1 beta should be > released. Where does that RID show up? Everything committed is stable and thoroughly tested. Being banged on by about 30,000 people now. My vote would be for a v2.1 beta, which includes all of my changes plus rid removal. Regards, bishop -- Bishop Bettini ideacode, Inc. (main) +1 919 341 5170 / (fax) +1 919 521 4100 Visit us on the web at: ideacode.com Professional software research and development reviewmysoftware.com Improve sales! Review your software before you release bytejar.com Solutions to those annoying development problems |
|
From: Matthew G. <mat...@gm...> - 2008-03-16 18:40:51
|
On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 16:57 +0100, Franky Van Liedekerke wrote: > Hi all, > > it has been a long time already for a new version, and some of you have > contributed some nice code (I think maily Bishop Bettini). > Could those who contributed add their changes to the CHANGELOG file? > Also, I changed some small pieces of code so that a conditional > question can be required as well now (it used to be a stupid limit). > Next thing on the list: remove the insecure "rid" variable from the > html output, since it allows people to overwrite other results. > I'm experimenting with using a session variable instead, and will > commit that code asap, but first I would like that everybody test the > latest svn code and if no remarks are given, I would like to release a > new version. What do you think? I'm not sure of the status of all of Bishops changes. If all of his changes are in a completed state then maybe a 2.1 beta should be released. Where does that RID show up? |
|
From: Franky V. L. <lie...@te...> - 2008-03-16 16:01:51
|
Hi all, it has been a long time already for a new version, and some of you have contributed some nice code (I think maily Bishop Bettini). Could those who contributed add their changes to the CHANGELOG file? Also, I changed some small pieces of code so that a conditional question can be required as well now (it used to be a stupid limit). Next thing on the list: remove the insecure "rid" variable from the html output, since it allows people to overwrite other results. I'm experimenting with using a session variable instead, and will commit that code asap, but first I would like that everybody test the latest svn code and if no remarks are given, I would like to release a new version. What do you think? Franky |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-03-10 13:59:53
|
Feature Requests item #1898498, was opened at 2008-02-21 03:13 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by greggmc You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=1898498&group_id=8956 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: survey format Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Andreas van Egmond-Fröhlich (egmondmd) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: interactive questionnaire Initial Comment: Using phpesp as part of the moodle questionnaire module successfully for questionnaires designed for obese adolescents entering treatment has lead us to a wellknown paradox: the potentially relevant areas of questioning and respective questionnaires far exceeds the total length of the questionnaire tolerated by our patients. We would like to solve this by using one or two screening questions per area that if the answers indicate a problem in this area open a detailed questionnaire. Unfortunately have not been able to identify possibilities to use the current version in such a way. Is it possible to extend the functionality? If necessary we would offer a financial incentive for such an extension as we feel that an intelligent interactive diagnostic instrument could help to individualize the care for obese adolescents in an affordable way. In this package it would be necessary to export all screnning and detail questionnaire results as one csv file for further analysis and display. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Matthew Gregg (greggmc) Date: 2008-03-10 08:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14116 Originator: NO phpESP version 2.0.2 includes "conditional" question functionality. That will allow you to show questions based on the answer to a previous question. Unfortunately I doubt version 2.0.2 has been ported to the Moodle questionnaire module. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=1898498&group_id=8956 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-02-21 08:13:10
|
Feature Requests item #1898498, was opened at 2008-02-21 09:13 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=1898498&group_id=8956 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: survey format Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Andreas van Egmond-Fröhlich (egmondmd) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: interactive questionnaire Initial Comment: Using phpesp as part of the moodle questionnaire module successfully for questionnaires designed for obese adolescents entering treatment has lead us to a wellknown paradox: the potentially relevant areas of questioning and respective questionnaires far exceeds the total length of the questionnaire tolerated by our patients. We would like to solve this by using one or two screening questions per area that if the answers indicate a problem in this area open a detailed questionnaire. Unfortunately have not been able to identify possibilities to use the current version in such a way. Is it possible to extend the functionality? If necessary we would offer a financial incentive for such an extension as we feel that an intelligent interactive diagnostic instrument could help to individualize the care for obese adolescents in an affordable way. In this package it would be necessary to export all screnning and detail questionnaire results as one csv file for further analysis and display. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=1898498&group_id=8956 |
|
From: Bishop B. <ph...@id...> - 2008-02-21 01:44:47
|
In admin/include/function/survey_update.inc, change line 106 to:
case 'preguntas':
In that same file, change lines 112, 137, 155, 244, 284, and 292 to:
$tab = 'preguntas';
In that same file, change line 326 to:
if(isset($_POST['preguntas'])) {
In that same file, change line 327 to:
$qid = intval($_POST['preguntas']);
That should get you going.... You'll need to do similar things when
you change the other words.
Developers: that. really. should. be. simplified. :)
bishop
Quoting Jesus Sahagun <asa...@sa...>:
> <div id="tabmenu">
>
> <input type="submit" name="tab" value="General" />
>
> <input type="submit" name="tab" value="Preguntas" />
>
> <input type="submit" name="tab" value="Order" />
>
> <input type="submit" name="tab" value="Conditions" />
>
> <input type="submit" name="tab" value="Preview" />
>
> <input type="submit" name="tab" value="Finish" />
>
> </div>
>
>
>
> Thats the part of tab.inc that Ive changed, also Ive renamed questions.inc
> to preguntas.inc, and I can see the changes and the translation, but when I
> try to save a new question it never gets into the database, I get the empty
> form again, but I cant see the question in the edit question select. What
> am I doing wrong?.
>
>
>
> Thanks everyone
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Bishop Bettini
ideacode, Inc.
(main) +1 919 341 5170 / (fax) +1 919 521 4100
Visit us on the web at:
ideacode.com Professional software research and development
reviewmysoftware.com Improve sales! Review your software before you release
bytejar.com Solutions to those annoying development problems
|
|
From: Bishop B. <ph...@id...> - 2008-02-20 23:29:26
|
I believe the button corresponds to files in admin/include/tab/. For example, general.inc corresponds to the General tab. Check that you've changed only the label, and not the name, and you should be fine. If you still have trouble, post your changes. bishop Quoting Jesus Sahagun <asa...@sa...>: > If I translate the tabs directly in tab.inc, I see them in Spanish, but > nothing works, can somebody explain how does it works. thanks -- Bishop Bettini ideacode, Inc. (main) +1 919 341 5170 / (fax) +1 919 521 4100 Visit us on the web at: ideacode.com Professional software research and development reviewmysoftware.com Improve sales! Review your software before you release bytejar.com Solutions to those annoying development problems |
|
From: Bishop B. <ph...@id...> - 2008-02-20 19:30:34
|
By hard-coding the HTML in tab.inc. Someone should probably open up a feature request to put the button labels under string translation (via _()). bishop Quoting Jesus Sahagun <asa...@sa...>: > How can I translate the buttons on tab.inc, if there are not in the > messages.po file. > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > -- Bishop Bettini ideacode, Inc. (main) +1 919 341 5170 / (fax) +1 919 521 4100 Visit us on the web at: ideacode.com Professional software research and development reviewmysoftware.com Improve sales! Review your software before you release bytejar.com Solutions to those annoying development problems |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-02-20 15:10:29
|
Feature Requests item #1897639, was opened at 2008-02-20 04:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bishopb You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=1897639&group_id=8956 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: survey format Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: Yes Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: interactive questionnaire Initial Comment: Using phpesp as part of the moodle questionnaire module successfully for questionnaires designed for obese adolescents entering treatment has lead us to a wellknown paradox: the potentially relevant areas of questioning and respective questionnaires far exceeds the total length of the questionnaire tolerated by our patients. We would like to solve this by using one or two screening questions per area that if the answers indicate a problem in this area open a detailed questionnaire. Unfortunately have not been able to identify possibilities to use the current version in such a way. Is it possible to extend the functionality? If necessary we would offer a financial incentive for such an extension as we feel that an intelligent interactive diagnostic instrument could help to individualize the care for obese adolescents in an affordable way. In this package it would be necessary to export all screnning and detail questionnaire results as one csv file for further analysis and display. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: bishop (bishopb) Date: 2008-02-20 10:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1982963 Originator: NO Sounds like conditions to me. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Franky Van Liedekerke (liedekef) Date: 2008-02-20 05:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=109671 Originator: NO If I'm not mistaken, this can perfectly be resolved by using conditions on questions, no? Franky ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=1897639&group_id=8956 |
|
From: Bishop B. <ph...@id...> - 2008-02-20 14:38:30
|
Assuming you're working off of trunk, then: admin login * front-end: admin/include/lib/esphtml.forms.inc:show_login() * back-end: admin/include/lib/espauth*.inc user login * front-end: public/dashboard.php * back-end: admin/include/lib/espauth*.inc bishop Quoting Jesus Sahagun Ceniceros <asa...@sa...>: > I'm looking where is the login function, so I can translate the messages > there, but I can't seem to find it, if you are so kind as of telling me in > which file is it, I'll really appreciate it. Thanks > > -- Bishop Bettini ideacode, Inc. (main) +1 919 341 5170 / (fax) +1 919 521 4100 Visit us on the web at: ideacode.com Professional software research and development reviewmysoftware.com Improve sales! Review your software before you release bytejar.com Solutions to those annoying development problems |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-02-20 10:07:37
|
Feature Requests item #1897639, was opened at 2008-02-20 10:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by liedekef You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=1897639&group_id=8956 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: survey format Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: Yes Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: interactive questionnaire Initial Comment: Using phpesp as part of the moodle questionnaire module successfully for questionnaires designed for obese adolescents entering treatment has lead us to a wellknown paradox: the potentially relevant areas of questioning and respective questionnaires far exceeds the total length of the questionnaire tolerated by our patients. We would like to solve this by using one or two screening questions per area that if the answers indicate a problem in this area open a detailed questionnaire. Unfortunately have not been able to identify possibilities to use the current version in such a way. Is it possible to extend the functionality? If necessary we would offer a financial incentive for such an extension as we feel that an intelligent interactive diagnostic instrument could help to individualize the care for obese adolescents in an affordable way. In this package it would be necessary to export all screnning and detail questionnaire results as one csv file for further analysis and display. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Franky Van Liedekerke (liedekef) Date: 2008-02-20 11:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=109671 Originator: NO If I'm not mistaken, this can perfectly be resolved by using conditions on questions, no? Franky ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=1897639&group_id=8956 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-02-20 09:31:48
|
Feature Requests item #1897639, was opened at 2008-02-20 01:31 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=1897639&group_id=8956 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: survey format Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: Yes Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: interactive questionnaire Initial Comment: Using phpesp as part of the moodle questionnaire module successfully for questionnaires designed for obese adolescents entering treatment has lead us to a wellknown paradox: the potentially relevant areas of questioning and respective questionnaires far exceeds the total length of the questionnaire tolerated by our patients. We would like to solve this by using one or two screening questions per area that if the answers indicate a problem in this area open a detailed questionnaire. Unfortunately have not been able to identify possibilities to use the current version in such a way. Is it possible to extend the functionality? If necessary we would offer a financial incentive for such an extension as we feel that an intelligent interactive diagnostic instrument could help to individualize the care for obese adolescents in an affordable way. In this package it would be necessary to export all screnning and detail questionnaire results as one csv file for further analysis and display. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=1897639&group_id=8956 |
|
From: Jesus S. C. <asa...@sa...> - 2008-02-20 03:31:17
|
I'm looking where is the login function, so I can translate the messages there, but I can't seem to find it, if you are so kind as of telling me in which file is it, I'll really appreciate it. Thanks |
|
From: Bishop B. <ph...@id...> - 2008-02-20 01:05:18
|
Jesus, Simply define your own CSS, and bootstrap it in. AFAIK, there isn't a design guideline. Others on the list know more, however. bishop Quoting Jesus Sahagun <asa...@sa...>: > Is there any trouble if I make some sort of "skin" in the admin console, to > fit the design of my site?, if so. Do you have any kind of guideline for > it?. > > Thanks > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: Bishop Bettini [mailto:ph...@id...] > Enviado el: martes, 19 de febrero de 2008 02:29 p.m. > Para: Jesus Sahagun > CC: php...@li... > Asunto: Re: [phpesp-dev] Translations > > Jesus, > > You need to restart your web server after modifying the .po file (and > running msgfmt). Then, your changes should be visible. > > Thank you for the translations! > > Regards, > bishop > > Quoting Jesus Sahagun <asa...@sa...>: > >> I'm trying to translate phpESP to spanish_mx, and help translating the > es_ES >> part so it is complete, but I need some help or pointers as to how to do > it, >> because if I change the messages.po file, and run the msgfmt --verbose >> messages.po although it generates a new messages.mo file, the changes I > made >> does not reflect into the page. Thanks >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > Bishop Bettini > ideacode, Inc. > (main) +1 919 341 5170 / (fax) +1 919 521 4100 > > Visit us on the web at: > ideacode.com Professional software research and development > reviewmysoftware.com Improve sales! Review your software before you release > bytejar.com Solutions to those annoying development problems > > > -- Bishop Bettini ideacode, Inc. (main) +1 919 341 5170 / (fax) +1 919 521 4100 Visit us on the web at: ideacode.com Professional software research and development reviewmysoftware.com Improve sales! Review your software before you release bytejar.com Solutions to those annoying development problems |
|
From: Bishop B. <ph...@id...> - 2008-02-19 20:29:03
|
Jesus, You need to restart your web server after modifying the .po file (and running msgfmt). Then, your changes should be visible. Thank you for the translations! Regards, bishop Quoting Jesus Sahagun <asa...@sa...>: > Im trying to translate phpESP to spanish_mx, and help translating the es_ES > part so it is complete, but I need some help or pointers as to how to do it, > because if I change the messages.po file, and run the msgfmt --verbose > messages.po although it generates a new messages.mo file, the changes I made > does not reflect into the page. Thanks > > > > > > > > -- Bishop Bettini ideacode, Inc. (main) +1 919 341 5170 / (fax) +1 919 521 4100 Visit us on the web at: ideacode.com Professional software research and development reviewmysoftware.com Improve sales! Review your software before you release bytejar.com Solutions to those annoying development problems |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-02-18 17:11:55
|
Bugs item #1894649, was opened at 2008-02-15 15:50 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bishopb You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108956&aid=1894649&group_id=8956 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Admin Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Later Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Copy an Existing Survey option NOT copying conditions Initial Comment: When making a copy of an existing survey in version 2.0.2, the conditions for that survey are NOT being copied (new copy has no conditions). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: bishop (bishopb) Date: 2008-02-18 12:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1982963 Originator: NO survey_copy() is now just a trivial case of survey_aggregate(), but survey_aggregate() doesn't do anything with conditions because it is just an elaboration of the original copy code. To implement condition copying, a mapping between surveys and their old and new question ids would have to be established. Then, something like this: foreach original survey get all conditions for that survey foreach condition replace survey_id with new survey id lookup q1_id in map and replace with new q1 id lookup q2_id in map and replace with new q2 id insert condition Most likely, this pseudo code would be put in a loop after the copy survey question call. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Franky Van Liedekerke (liedekef) Date: 2008-02-15 18:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=109671 Originator: NO This is true and known, but not a bug. For now the copy code is a bit too sloppy to allow the conditions to be copied as well (since the new questions have different ID's, it's a bit difficult to correlate the conditions ...). If you want this, please open a feature request. Also: new code is in progress that might just solve this problem. Franky ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108956&aid=1894649&group_id=8956 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-02-15 23:30:29
|
Bugs item #1870884, was opened at 2008-01-14 07:13 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by liedekef You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108956&aid=1870884&group_id=8956 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Admin Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Greg, pls explain fix Initial Comment: I'm just a cookbook novice trying to set up a survey. You answered this problem for someone else but I don't know enough to understand your fix. Can you elaborate or point me to any other documentation? Thanks, Rick Perkins ri...@ad... Fatal error: Call to a member function on a non-object in /espdatalib.inc on line 124 Date: 2005-08-08 07:26 Sender: greggmcProject AdminAccepting Donations Logged In: YES user_id=14116 Proper fix for this is to check for and init adodb in handler.php and handler-prefix.php. I've commited this to CVS. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Franky Van Liedekerke (liedekef) Date: 2008-02-16 00:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=109671 Originator: NO I believe this to be fixed (I talked him through it in private: the issue about the missing IP column later on). So unless I'm wrong, this can be closed. Franky ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2008-01-23 05:35 Message: Logged In: NO Franky: I was already using 2.0.2 but I deleted everything and started over just to make sure. Same result. You can see fatal error here: http://perkpress.com/Surveys/phpESP-2.0.2/index.php I'm about to give up. Any other suggestions? Thanks Rick Perkins ri...@ad... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Franky Van Liedekerke (liedekef) Date: 2008-01-16 23:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=109671 Originator: NO Well the answer is easy: update to 2.0.2 and it should be fixed. Examples can be found in the example subdir ... Franky ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108956&aid=1870884&group_id=8956 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-02-15 23:27:38
|
Bugs item #1894649, was opened at 2008-02-15 21:50 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by liedekef You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108956&aid=1894649&group_id=8956 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Admin Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Later Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Copy an Existing Survey option NOT copying conditions Initial Comment: When making a copy of an existing survey in version 2.0.2, the conditions for that survey are NOT being copied (new copy has no conditions). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Franky Van Liedekerke (liedekef) Date: 2008-02-16 00:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=109671 Originator: NO This is true and known, but not a bug. For now the copy code is a bit too sloppy to allow the conditions to be copied as well (since the new questions have different ID's, it's a bit difficult to correlate the conditions ...). If you want this, please open a feature request. Also: new code is in progress that might just solve this problem. Franky ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108956&aid=1894649&group_id=8956 |
24 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
