Re: subkey selection
Brought to you by:
ftobin
|
From: Frank T. <ft...@ui...> - 2001-01-14 23:53:35
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Billy Donahue, at 13:19 -0500 on Sun, 14 Jan 2001, wrote:
that would be cool. Werner et al. say that that's what bash alias is for,
but that's only useful if you're using bash as the interpreter.
a MUA which does a direct execve of gpg (or pggenvelope, for that matter)
isn't going to be able to use bash's aliases.
exactly.
As far as subkeys go, I never worry about them, and I don't really
understand them.
Hmm, sounds like having multiple subkeys might have been a bad idea in the
OpenPGP spec.
I'm going to start work on a simple wrapper recipient-aliasing program.
If there are other features that might be useful, please let me know.
- --
Frank Tobin http://www.uiuc.edu/~ftobin/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: pgpenvelope 2.9.0 - http://pgpenvelope.sourceforge.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAjpiO/YACgkQVv/RCiYMT6PUvQCcCYlbjUiAT0OuqU+rBiOjLCLW
yGwAnAr7BHTEKzNtUTgXiqBKvt12ny+a
=tck3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|