Re: [pe-users] PGPEnvelope not using -t when encrypting?
Brought to you by:
ftobin
|
From: L. S. <ra...@qu...> - 2000-04-30 10:34:27
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Frank Tobin wrote: > L. Sassaman, at 20:29 -0700 on Tue, 25 Apr 2000, wrote: > > > The subject says it all. On windows, in the text viewer, messages are > > munged, as though gpg was called without -t. > > Yeah, I remember this problem from before. I'll see what I can do. Don't bother. I have fixed it (was a problem in GnuPG::Interface), and attached the patch and sig. Now you get to name someone in your THANKS file. ;) I created 4 new functions as well, which are really the original four that I changed, renamed without the --textmode option added. I don't believe that GnuPG::Interface is being used by anything other than PGPEnvelope at this time, so this was the easiest way to do things. (Basically, the old functions needed to still be available for signing/encrypting binary files). But regardless, PGPEnvelope works now as soon as you drop in the patched GnuPG::Interface. If you wish to make things a little clearer, you could revert to the original naming for those four "binary" functions, and name the others [..]_text or something along those lines. PGPEnvelope would need to be updated to call the new functions, however. It's up to you. - --Len. __ L. Sassaman System Administrator | Technology Consultant | "To hold a pen is to be at war." icq.. 10735603 | pgp.. finger://ns.quickie.net/rabbi | --Voltaire -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: OpenPGP Encrypted Email Preferred. iD8DBQE5DAo5PYrxsgmsCmoRAkB5AKCDT4awCq/kH4NoumCPhwzxhIDpOQCfcQ6R n2x8XXWPb+wHHLKmt+Wz/MY= =p75P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |