Re: [Pdl-general] C::Blocks vs PDL performance

[Chris M. <dev...@gm...>]

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Chris Marshall <dev...@gm...>
wrote:

> Hi David-
>
> I did forget another component which may be applicable to the PDL
> script performance: the move to 64bit indexing which while very general,
> will clearly impact the memory overhead etc. from the indexing and
> computations.  I would guess that we may have exceeded the cache
> line size which would definitely slow things down as well.
>
>
 I just checked on my cygwin/win7 PDL-2.015 install and the pdl struct is a
cache-busting 328 bytes.  I wonder how much difference if we whittled it
down to 256 or less?

--Chris