From: Paul A. <pau...@gm...> - 2007-03-14 13:21:29
|
On 3/14/07, Rob Conway <rjc...@bi...> wrote: > > owfs/fuse worked ok if you only have one script collecting data > > I am now confused on when someone would use owfs/fuse?... now that you > have pointed me to owshell functionality. Does the same thing without > having to rely on fuse > > rob > FUSE advantages: 1. No need to run owserver (if no other processes need access). 2. All languages can do file access -- owshell requires spawning a new process. 3. Easier to use tar, gzip and tools like that. 4. Directory traversals, file lists, etc are more natural than the string prcfessing needed with owshell -- especially helpful when the 1-wire layout isn't known beforehand. OWSHELL advantages: 1. No need for FUSE, it's kernel module, or library. 2. No need for a mount point, and no permissions issues. 3. Runs on all platforms. (Probably anything that has a tcp stack). 4. Completely public domain (not GPL). 5. Very small binary Paul Alfille |