Re: [OSRAIDS-developers] Update

[<osr...@li...>]

Yes this is true, but UTF-8 _is_ ISO 10646. Let me explain. They are
bit for bit identical. Everything that works with that ISO will work
with UTF-8. The question is, how will a search engine or futures user
agent handle such a vauge statement. If I want all user agents in the
future to understand the language desired I will have to force it upon
them in a standard way.


Just beat Halo2. Weak ending if I do say so. Back to work until the Lan party.


I am working on the setup and am going to implement the language
system at the minimum until I am happy with the standards.


On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 08:16:25 +0100,
osr...@li...
<osr...@li...> wrote:
> Not exactly. UTF-8 is a method of encoding of unicode text, where common
> english characters are written as ordinary 8-bit text and just special
> characters are encoded as a sequence of two bytes. There are also another
> encoding methods, like UTF-16, UCS-2 etc. All they are a part of the Unicode
> standard.
> 
> On Thursday 11 November 2004 02:49,
> osr...@li... wrote:
> > UTF-8 is ISO 10646 just with a easy name. I am looking for the common
> > roadmap as some sections of the standards group are looking for the
> > "all or nothing" and others are working on the "seperate is better"
> > setup.
> 
> --
> 
> 
> Robert Zelnik
> e-mail: rz...@vs...
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
> LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Osraids-developers mailing list
> Osr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/osraids-developers
> 


-- 
Andrew Latham

http://www.lathama.com
la...@gm...
la...@ya...
la...@la...
If any of the above are not working we have 
bigger problems than my email.