opensipstack-devel Mailing List for OpenSIPStack (Page 13)
Brought to you by:
joegenbaclor
Menu
▾
▴
opensipstack-devel
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2006 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(5) |
Jun
(12) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(24) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(41) |
Dec
(67) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 |
Jan
(51) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(54) |
Apr
(76) |
May
(114) |
Jun
(133) |
Jul
(124) |
Aug
(180) |
Sep
(53) |
Oct
(41) |
Nov
(109) |
Dec
(92) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(52) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(29) |
Apr
(40) |
May
(83) |
Jun
(68) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(72) |
Sep
(50) |
Oct
(48) |
Nov
(25) |
Dec
(80) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(67) |
May
|
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(10) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
(5) |
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2013 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Manoj J. <ma...@as...> - 2008-10-16 08:21:35
|
Yes actually i am trying to implement another Encryption logic into it. I have also added g723 codec. -----Original Message----- From: Joegen E. Baclor [mailto:joe...@gm...] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 1:02 PM To: ope...@li... Cc: jo...@op... Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] ATLSIP multiple calls Encryption is done on the entire RTP packet, not just the payload. What are you trying to do exactly? Are you trying to make your own custom encryption server based on XOR encryption of OpenSIPStack? Manoj Joshi wrote: > Hello Joegan, > > Could you please reply to my query?....Is this called for each packet?...or > for frame...does it matter if its is called for each frame or for packet. > > Regards, > > Manoj > > -----Original Message----- > From: Manoj Joshi [mailto:ma...@as...] > Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:10 PM > To: jo...@op...; ope...@li... > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] ATLSIP multiple calls > > > In your logic are you calling Encryption::Engine::Encrypt( in, out ) for > every RTP packet or what?...coz in SIP you are capturing whole message first > and then encrypting? > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: jo...@op... [mailto:joe...@gm...] > Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:00 PM > To: ope...@li... > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] ATLSIP multiple calls > > > Manoj Joshi wrote: > >> I ran some debug and found following messages at OpenSBC. "RTP_UDP Session >> 1, Received data packet too small: 36 bytes" >> There are many messages like that. >> >> > > This is an indication that the RTP packet is either truncated or is not > formatted correctly. > > > >> Also...does it matter if i call "Encryption::Engine::Encrypt( in, out )" >> > for > >> each RTP packet?..i guess headers will be encrypted too right? >> >> > > Headers will be encrypted too, yes > > > >> Regards, >> >> manoj >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Joegen E. Baclor [mailto:joe...@gm...] >> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 2:46 PM >> To: Manoj Joshi >> Cc: ope...@li... >> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] ATLSIP multiple calls >> >> >> OpenSBC should decrypt the RTP and SIP packets automatically. You might >> want to run wireshark in OpenSBC and see if RTP is being decrypted >> properly as well. >> >> Manoj Joshi wrote: >> >> >>> Hello Joegen, >>> >>> Do we send any extra header in SIP Invite from Opensipclient to OpenSBC >>> > to > >>> indicate wether it should encrypt RTP?...Or OpenSBC decrypts RTP by >>> >>> >> default >> >> >>> if SIP packets are encrypted? >>> >>> The problem is i am not receiving any Voice at both ends when i enable >>> Encryption however i can see SIP packets being encrypted decrypted fine. >>> > I > >>> am using OSSphone to initiate calls. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Manoj >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Joegen E. Baclor [mailto:joe...@gm...] >>> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 9:43 PM >>> To: ope...@li... >>> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] ATLSIP multiple calls >>> >>> >>> Robert, >>> >>> I regret to say it but ATLSIP only support single channel for now. It a >>> very nice to have functionality and I agree it has to be supported in >>> future versions. >>> >>> Joegen >>> >>> Robert Vos wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I was wondering if it possible to handle multiple calls with ATLSIP. I >>>> >>>> >> am >> >> >>>> attempting to make an operator soft phone, where there can be multiple >>>> incoming calls at the same time. I plan to use it with a SIP intercom >>>> system, so it is especially important that the operator knows about all >>>> incoming calls. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Is there anyway to do this with ATLSIP, or perhaps modify it to allow >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> this? >>> >>> >>> >>>> I have thought of a possible work around, where one registers several >>>> > sip > >>>> components, and then setup the asterisk server to phone them >>>> >>>> >> consecutively >> >> >>>> until it finds one that is open. This might work, but it seems very >>>> inefficient. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I would really appreciate any help on this. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Robert Vos >>>> >>>> >>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- - >>>> > - > >>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> challenge >>> >>> >>> >>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> prizes >>> >>> >>> >>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> world >>> >>> >>> >>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>> ope...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- - >>>> >>>> >>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>>> Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/1721 - Release Date: >>>> >>>> >> 10/12/2008 >> >> >>> 12:00 PM >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - >>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>> >>> >> challenge >> >> >>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>> prizes >>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >>> >>> >> world >> >> >>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>> >>> >>> -- >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>> Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/696 - Release Date: 10/9/2008 >>> 12:00 AM >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/696 - Release Date: 10/9/2008 >> 12:00 AM >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >> > challenge > >> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >> > prizes > >> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >> > world > >> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great > prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/696 - Release Date: 10/9/2008 > 12:00 AM > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great > prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/696 - Release Date: 10/9/2008 > 12:00 AM > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ opensipstack-devel mailing list ope...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 270.8.1/696 - Release Date: 10/15/2008 12:00 AM |
|
From: Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...> - 2008-10-16 07:32:34
|
Encryption is done on the entire RTP packet, not just the payload. What are you trying to do exactly? Are you trying to make your own custom encryption server based on XOR encryption of OpenSIPStack? Manoj Joshi wrote: > Hello Joegan, > > Could you please reply to my query?....Is this called for each packet?...or > for frame...does it matter if its is called for each frame or for packet. > > Regards, > > Manoj > > -----Original Message----- > From: Manoj Joshi [mailto:ma...@as...] > Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:10 PM > To: jo...@op...; ope...@li... > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] ATLSIP multiple calls > > > In your logic are you calling Encryption::Engine::Encrypt( in, out ) for > every RTP packet or what?...coz in SIP you are capturing whole message first > and then encrypting? > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: jo...@op... [mailto:joe...@gm...] > Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:00 PM > To: ope...@li... > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] ATLSIP multiple calls > > > Manoj Joshi wrote: > >> I ran some debug and found following messages at OpenSBC. "RTP_UDP Session >> 1, Received data packet too small: 36 bytes" >> There are many messages like that. >> >> > > This is an indication that the RTP packet is either truncated or is not > formatted correctly. > > > >> Also...does it matter if i call "Encryption::Engine::Encrypt( in, out )" >> > for > >> each RTP packet?..i guess headers will be encrypted too right? >> >> > > Headers will be encrypted too, yes > > > >> Regards, >> >> manoj >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Joegen E. Baclor [mailto:joe...@gm...] >> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 2:46 PM >> To: Manoj Joshi >> Cc: ope...@li... >> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] ATLSIP multiple calls >> >> >> OpenSBC should decrypt the RTP and SIP packets automatically. You might >> want to run wireshark in OpenSBC and see if RTP is being decrypted >> properly as well. >> >> Manoj Joshi wrote: >> >> >>> Hello Joegen, >>> >>> Do we send any extra header in SIP Invite from Opensipclient to OpenSBC >>> > to > >>> indicate wether it should encrypt RTP?...Or OpenSBC decrypts RTP by >>> >>> >> default >> >> >>> if SIP packets are encrypted? >>> >>> The problem is i am not receiving any Voice at both ends when i enable >>> Encryption however i can see SIP packets being encrypted decrypted fine. >>> > I > >>> am using OSSphone to initiate calls. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Manoj >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Joegen E. Baclor [mailto:joe...@gm...] >>> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 9:43 PM >>> To: ope...@li... >>> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] ATLSIP multiple calls >>> >>> >>> Robert, >>> >>> I regret to say it but ATLSIP only support single channel for now. It a >>> very nice to have functionality and I agree it has to be supported in >>> future versions. >>> >>> Joegen >>> >>> Robert Vos wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I was wondering if it possible to handle multiple calls with ATLSIP. I >>>> >>>> >> am >> >> >>>> attempting to make an operator soft phone, where there can be multiple >>>> incoming calls at the same time. I plan to use it with a SIP intercom >>>> system, so it is especially important that the operator knows about all >>>> incoming calls. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Is there anyway to do this with ATLSIP, or perhaps modify it to allow >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> this? >>> >>> >>> >>>> I have thought of a possible work around, where one registers several >>>> > sip > >>>> components, and then setup the asterisk server to phone them >>>> >>>> >> consecutively >> >> >>>> until it finds one that is open. This might work, but it seems very >>>> inefficient. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I would really appreciate any help on this. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Robert Vos >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> > - > >>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> challenge >>> >>> >>> >>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> prizes >>> >>> >>> >>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> world >>> >>> >>> >>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>> ope...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> >>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>>> Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/1721 - Release Date: >>>> >>>> >> 10/12/2008 >> >> >>> 12:00 PM >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>> >>> >> challenge >> >> >>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>> prizes >>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >>> >>> >> world >> >> >>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>> >>> >>> -- >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>> Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/696 - Release Date: 10/9/2008 >>> 12:00 AM >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/696 - Release Date: 10/9/2008 >> 12:00 AM >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >> > challenge > >> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >> > prizes > >> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >> > world > >> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great > prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/696 - Release Date: 10/9/2008 > 12:00 AM > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great > prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/696 - Release Date: 10/9/2008 > 12:00 AM > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > |
|
From: Manoj J. <ma...@as...> - 2008-10-16 07:22:49
|
Hello Joegan, Could you please reply to my query?....Is this called for each packet?...or for frame...does it matter if its is called for each frame or for packet. Regards, Manoj -----Original Message----- From: Manoj Joshi [mailto:ma...@as...] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:10 PM To: jo...@op...; ope...@li... Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] ATLSIP multiple calls In your logic are you calling Encryption::Engine::Encrypt( in, out ) for every RTP packet or what?...coz in SIP you are capturing whole message first and then encrypting? -----Original Message----- From: jo...@op... [mailto:joe...@gm...] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:00 PM To: ope...@li... Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] ATLSIP multiple calls Manoj Joshi wrote: > I ran some debug and found following messages at OpenSBC. "RTP_UDP Session > 1, Received data packet too small: 36 bytes" > There are many messages like that. > This is an indication that the RTP packet is either truncated or is not formatted correctly. > Also...does it matter if i call "Encryption::Engine::Encrypt( in, out )" for > each RTP packet?..i guess headers will be encrypted too right? > Headers will be encrypted too, yes > Regards, > > manoj > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joegen E. Baclor [mailto:joe...@gm...] > Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 2:46 PM > To: Manoj Joshi > Cc: ope...@li... > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] ATLSIP multiple calls > > > OpenSBC should decrypt the RTP and SIP packets automatically. You might > want to run wireshark in OpenSBC and see if RTP is being decrypted > properly as well. > > Manoj Joshi wrote: > >> Hello Joegen, >> >> Do we send any extra header in SIP Invite from Opensipclient to OpenSBC to >> indicate wether it should encrypt RTP?...Or OpenSBC decrypts RTP by >> > default > >> if SIP packets are encrypted? >> >> The problem is i am not receiving any Voice at both ends when i enable >> Encryption however i can see SIP packets being encrypted decrypted fine. I >> am using OSSphone to initiate calls. >> >> Regards, >> >> Manoj >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Joegen E. Baclor [mailto:joe...@gm...] >> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 9:43 PM >> To: ope...@li... >> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] ATLSIP multiple calls >> >> >> Robert, >> >> I regret to say it but ATLSIP only support single channel for now. It a >> very nice to have functionality and I agree it has to be supported in >> future versions. >> >> Joegen >> >> Robert Vos wrote: >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>> I was wondering if it possible to handle multiple calls with ATLSIP. I >>> > am > >>> attempting to make an operator soft phone, where there can be multiple >>> incoming calls at the same time. I plan to use it with a SIP intercom >>> system, so it is especially important that the operator knows about all >>> incoming calls. >>> >>> >>> >>> Is there anyway to do this with ATLSIP, or perhaps modify it to allow >>> >>> >> this? >> >> >>> I have thought of a possible work around, where one registers several sip >>> components, and then setup the asterisk server to phone them >>> > consecutively > >>> until it finds one that is open. This might work, but it seems very >>> inefficient. >>> >>> >>> >>> I would really appreciate any help on this. >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Robert Vos >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - >>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>> >>> >> challenge >> >> >>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>> >>> >> prizes >> >> >>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >>> >>> >> world >> >> >>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>> Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/1721 - Release Date: >>> > 10/12/2008 > >> 12:00 PM >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >> > challenge > >> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >> prizes >> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >> > world > >> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> >> -- >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/696 - Release Date: 10/9/2008 >> 12:00 AM >> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/696 - Release Date: 10/9/2008 > 12:00 AM > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ opensipstack-devel mailing list ope...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/696 - Release Date: 10/9/2008 12:00 AM ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ opensipstack-devel mailing list ope...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/696 - Release Date: 10/9/2008 12:00 AM |
|
From: Manoj J. <ma...@as...> - 2008-10-15 09:41:46
|
In your logic are you calling Encryption::Engine::Encrypt( in, out ) for every RTP packet or what?...coz in SIP you are capturing whole message first and then encrypting? -----Original Message----- From: jo...@op... [mailto:joe...@gm...] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:00 PM To: ope...@li... Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] ATLSIP multiple calls Manoj Joshi wrote: > I ran some debug and found following messages at OpenSBC. "RTP_UDP Session > 1, Received data packet too small: 36 bytes" > There are many messages like that. > This is an indication that the RTP packet is either truncated or is not formatted correctly. > Also...does it matter if i call "Encryption::Engine::Encrypt( in, out )" for > each RTP packet?..i guess headers will be encrypted too right? > Headers will be encrypted too, yes > Regards, > > manoj > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joegen E. Baclor [mailto:joe...@gm...] > Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 2:46 PM > To: Manoj Joshi > Cc: ope...@li... > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] ATLSIP multiple calls > > > OpenSBC should decrypt the RTP and SIP packets automatically. You might > want to run wireshark in OpenSBC and see if RTP is being decrypted > properly as well. > > Manoj Joshi wrote: > >> Hello Joegen, >> >> Do we send any extra header in SIP Invite from Opensipclient to OpenSBC to >> indicate wether it should encrypt RTP?...Or OpenSBC decrypts RTP by >> > default > >> if SIP packets are encrypted? >> >> The problem is i am not receiving any Voice at both ends when i enable >> Encryption however i can see SIP packets being encrypted decrypted fine. I >> am using OSSphone to initiate calls. >> >> Regards, >> >> Manoj >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Joegen E. Baclor [mailto:joe...@gm...] >> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 9:43 PM >> To: ope...@li... >> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] ATLSIP multiple calls >> >> >> Robert, >> >> I regret to say it but ATLSIP only support single channel for now. It a >> very nice to have functionality and I agree it has to be supported in >> future versions. >> >> Joegen >> >> Robert Vos wrote: >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>> I was wondering if it possible to handle multiple calls with ATLSIP. I >>> > am > >>> attempting to make an operator soft phone, where there can be multiple >>> incoming calls at the same time. I plan to use it with a SIP intercom >>> system, so it is especially important that the operator knows about all >>> incoming calls. >>> >>> >>> >>> Is there anyway to do this with ATLSIP, or perhaps modify it to allow >>> >>> >> this? >> >> >>> I have thought of a possible work around, where one registers several sip >>> components, and then setup the asterisk server to phone them >>> > consecutively > >>> until it finds one that is open. This might work, but it seems very >>> inefficient. >>> >>> >>> >>> I would really appreciate any help on this. >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Robert Vos >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - >>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>> >>> >> challenge >> >> >>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>> >>> >> prizes >> >> >>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >>> >>> >> world >> >> >>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>> Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/1721 - Release Date: >>> > 10/12/2008 > >> 12:00 PM >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >> > challenge > >> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >> prizes >> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >> > world > >> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> >> -- >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/696 - Release Date: 10/9/2008 >> 12:00 AM >> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/696 - Release Date: 10/9/2008 > 12:00 AM > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ opensipstack-devel mailing list ope...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/696 - Release Date: 10/9/2008 12:00 AM |
|
From: <jo...@op...> - 2008-10-15 09:29:48
|
Manoj Joshi wrote: > I ran some debug and found following messages at OpenSBC. "RTP_UDP Session > 1, Received data packet too small: 36 bytes" > There are many messages like that. > This is an indication that the RTP packet is either truncated or is not formatted correctly. > Also...does it matter if i call "Encryption::Engine::Encrypt( in, out )" for > each RTP packet?..i guess headers will be encrypted too right? > Headers will be encrypted too, yes > Regards, > > manoj > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joegen E. Baclor [mailto:joe...@gm...] > Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 2:46 PM > To: Manoj Joshi > Cc: ope...@li... > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] ATLSIP multiple calls > > > OpenSBC should decrypt the RTP and SIP packets automatically. You might > want to run wireshark in OpenSBC and see if RTP is being decrypted > properly as well. > > Manoj Joshi wrote: > >> Hello Joegen, >> >> Do we send any extra header in SIP Invite from Opensipclient to OpenSBC to >> indicate wether it should encrypt RTP?...Or OpenSBC decrypts RTP by >> > default > >> if SIP packets are encrypted? >> >> The problem is i am not receiving any Voice at both ends when i enable >> Encryption however i can see SIP packets being encrypted decrypted fine. I >> am using OSSphone to initiate calls. >> >> Regards, >> >> Manoj >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Joegen E. Baclor [mailto:joe...@gm...] >> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 9:43 PM >> To: ope...@li... >> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] ATLSIP multiple calls >> >> >> Robert, >> >> I regret to say it but ATLSIP only support single channel for now. It a >> very nice to have functionality and I agree it has to be supported in >> future versions. >> >> Joegen >> >> Robert Vos wrote: >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>> I was wondering if it possible to handle multiple calls with ATLSIP. I >>> > am > >>> attempting to make an operator soft phone, where there can be multiple >>> incoming calls at the same time. I plan to use it with a SIP intercom >>> system, so it is especially important that the operator knows about all >>> incoming calls. >>> >>> >>> >>> Is there anyway to do this with ATLSIP, or perhaps modify it to allow >>> >>> >> this? >> >> >>> I have thought of a possible work around, where one registers several sip >>> components, and then setup the asterisk server to phone them >>> > consecutively > >>> until it finds one that is open. This might work, but it seems very >>> inefficient. >>> >>> >>> >>> I would really appreciate any help on this. >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Robert Vos >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>> >>> >> challenge >> >> >>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>> >>> >> prizes >> >> >>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >>> >>> >> world >> >> >>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>> Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/1721 - Release Date: >>> > 10/12/2008 > >> 12:00 PM >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >> > challenge > >> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >> prizes >> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >> > world > >> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> >> -- >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/696 - Release Date: 10/9/2008 >> 12:00 AM >> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/696 - Release Date: 10/9/2008 > 12:00 AM > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > |
|
From: Manoj J. <ma...@as...> - 2008-10-15 09:21:42
|
I ran some debug and found following messages at OpenSBC. "RTP_UDP Session 1, Received data packet too small: 36 bytes" There are many messages like that. Also...does it matter if i call "Encryption::Engine::Encrypt( in, out )" for each RTP packet?..i guess headers will be encrypted too right? Regards, manoj -----Original Message----- From: Joegen E. Baclor [mailto:joe...@gm...] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 2:46 PM To: Manoj Joshi Cc: ope...@li... Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] ATLSIP multiple calls OpenSBC should decrypt the RTP and SIP packets automatically. You might want to run wireshark in OpenSBC and see if RTP is being decrypted properly as well. Manoj Joshi wrote: > Hello Joegen, > > Do we send any extra header in SIP Invite from Opensipclient to OpenSBC to > indicate wether it should encrypt RTP?...Or OpenSBC decrypts RTP by default > if SIP packets are encrypted? > > The problem is i am not receiving any Voice at both ends when i enable > Encryption however i can see SIP packets being encrypted decrypted fine. I > am using OSSphone to initiate calls. > > Regards, > > Manoj > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joegen E. Baclor [mailto:joe...@gm...] > Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 9:43 PM > To: ope...@li... > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] ATLSIP multiple calls > > > Robert, > > I regret to say it but ATLSIP only support single channel for now. It a > very nice to have functionality and I agree it has to be supported in > future versions. > > Joegen > > Robert Vos wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I was wondering if it possible to handle multiple calls with ATLSIP. I am >> attempting to make an operator soft phone, where there can be multiple >> incoming calls at the same time. I plan to use it with a SIP intercom >> system, so it is especially important that the operator knows about all >> incoming calls. >> >> >> >> Is there anyway to do this with ATLSIP, or perhaps modify it to allow >> > this? > >> >> I have thought of a possible work around, where one registers several sip >> components, and then setup the asterisk server to phone them consecutively >> until it finds one that is open. This might work, but it seems very >> inefficient. >> >> >> >> I would really appreciate any help on this. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Robert Vos >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >> > challenge > >> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >> > prizes > >> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >> > world > >> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >> Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/1721 - Release Date: 10/12/2008 >> > 12:00 PM > >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great > prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/696 - Release Date: 10/9/2008 > 12:00 AM > > > > -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/696 - Release Date: 10/9/2008 12:00 AM |
|
From: Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...> - 2008-10-15 09:21:22
|
OpenSBC should decrypt the RTP and SIP packets automatically. You might want to run wireshark in OpenSBC and see if RTP is being decrypted properly as well. Manoj Joshi wrote: > Hello Joegen, > > Do we send any extra header in SIP Invite from Opensipclient to OpenSBC to > indicate wether it should encrypt RTP?...Or OpenSBC decrypts RTP by default > if SIP packets are encrypted? > > The problem is i am not receiving any Voice at both ends when i enable > Encryption however i can see SIP packets being encrypted decrypted fine. I > am using OSSphone to initiate calls. > > Regards, > > Manoj > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joegen E. Baclor [mailto:joe...@gm...] > Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 9:43 PM > To: ope...@li... > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] ATLSIP multiple calls > > > Robert, > > I regret to say it but ATLSIP only support single channel for now. It a > very nice to have functionality and I agree it has to be supported in > future versions. > > Joegen > > Robert Vos wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I was wondering if it possible to handle multiple calls with ATLSIP. I am >> attempting to make an operator soft phone, where there can be multiple >> incoming calls at the same time. I plan to use it with a SIP intercom >> system, so it is especially important that the operator knows about all >> incoming calls. >> >> >> >> Is there anyway to do this with ATLSIP, or perhaps modify it to allow >> > this? > >> >> I have thought of a possible work around, where one registers several sip >> components, and then setup the asterisk server to phone them consecutively >> until it finds one that is open. This might work, but it seems very >> inefficient. >> >> >> >> I would really appreciate any help on this. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Robert Vos >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >> > challenge > >> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >> > prizes > >> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >> > world > >> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >> Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/1721 - Release Date: 10/12/2008 >> > 12:00 PM > >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great > prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/696 - Release Date: 10/9/2008 > 12:00 AM > > > > |
|
From: Manoj J. <ma...@as...> - 2008-10-15 09:05:54
|
Hello Joegen, Do we send any extra header in SIP Invite from Opensipclient to OpenSBC to indicate wether it should encrypt RTP?...Or OpenSBC decrypts RTP by default if SIP packets are encrypted? The problem is i am not receiving any Voice at both ends when i enable Encryption however i can see SIP packets being encrypted decrypted fine. I am using OSSphone to initiate calls. Regards, Manoj -----Original Message----- From: Joegen E. Baclor [mailto:joe...@gm...] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 9:43 PM To: ope...@li... Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] ATLSIP multiple calls Robert, I regret to say it but ATLSIP only support single channel for now. It a very nice to have functionality and I agree it has to be supported in future versions. Joegen Robert Vos wrote: > Hi, > > > > I was wondering if it possible to handle multiple calls with ATLSIP. I am > attempting to make an operator soft phone, where there can be multiple > incoming calls at the same time. I plan to use it with a SIP intercom > system, so it is especially important that the operator knows about all > incoming calls. > > > > Is there anyway to do this with ATLSIP, or perhaps modify it to allow this? > > > > I have thought of a possible work around, where one registers several sip > components, and then setup the asterisk server to phone them consecutively > until it finds one that is open. This might work, but it seems very > inefficient. > > > > I would really appreciate any help on this. > > > > Regards, > > Robert Vos > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/1721 - Release Date: 10/12/2008 12:00 PM > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ opensipstack-devel mailing list ope...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/696 - Release Date: 10/9/2008 12:00 AM |
|
From: Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...> - 2008-10-13 16:13:27
|
Robert, I regret to say it but ATLSIP only support single channel for now. It a very nice to have functionality and I agree it has to be supported in future versions. Joegen Robert Vos wrote: > Hi, > > > > I was wondering if it possible to handle multiple calls with ATLSIP. I am > attempting to make an operator soft phone, where there can be multiple > incoming calls at the same time. I plan to use it with a SIP intercom > system, so it is especially important that the operator knows about all > incoming calls. > > > > Is there anyway to do this with ATLSIP, or perhaps modify it to allow this? > > > > I have thought of a possible work around, where one registers several sip > components, and then setup the asterisk server to phone them consecutively > until it finds one that is open. This might work, but it seems very > inefficient. > > > > I would really appreciate any help on this. > > > > Regards, > > Robert Vos > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/1721 - Release Date: 10/12/2008 12:00 PM > > |
|
From: Robert V. <ro...@dc...> - 2008-10-13 13:48:36
|
Hi, I was wondering if it possible to handle multiple calls with ATLSIP. I am attempting to make an operator soft phone, where there can be multiple incoming calls at the same time. I plan to use it with a SIP intercom system, so it is especially important that the operator knows about all incoming calls. Is there anyway to do this with ATLSIP, or perhaps modify it to allow this? I have thought of a possible work around, where one registers several sip components, and then setup the asterisk server to phone them consecutively until it finds one that is open. This might work, but it seems very inefficient. I would really appreciate any help on this. Regards, Robert Vos |
|
From: OpenSIPStack F. <ope...@op...> - 2008-10-08 02:16:44
|
> {quote:title=xbipin wrote:}{quote}
> i was just trying to figure out a way to compile opensipstack with that openssl support but cant seem to get it working only as cant figure out the directory structure of openssl and the required directory structure of opensipstack.
>
> Secondly if some how it managed to compile opesipstack to use openssl then can it support the ssl method of voip used by linksys spa3102 ATA and snom TLS and if so then can it decrypt that signalling and media and send ahead to gateways, softswitches in upper registration mode?
Bipin,
TLS is not supported in OpenSIPStack. However, if your motivation is to find IP Phones that would traverse VoIP filters, you may still use the proprietary OpenSBC XOR. Grandstream Phones have XOR encryption support. It is called CBCOM mode in their config. :-)
Joegen
|
|
From: Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...> - 2008-10-08 02:10:46
|
Andre I will try to back-track the changes. That revision was checked in by another developer. I need to confer with him before I conuld confirm what really changed since then. Joegen André Mamitzsch wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello Joegen, > > the rewrite of the domain in the from field seems to work until > 1.1.5-10. After that, and I compiled almost everything what I could get > from CVS, it is not working anymore. > > I tried to have a look at the differences in order to find out why it > changed and what was changed. I could identify that in Version 1.28 of > the Router.cxx the Feature: > > Router.cxx: * Added feature to rewrite the FROM domain to a specific > domain in the B2BUA routes > > was added. > > At the moment I' m unable to find a good starting point - if you could > give me a small hint please... > > Andre > > > Andre Mamitzsch schrieb: > >> Hello Joegen, >> >> thanks for your reply. I'm with you regarding the 50/50 - I checked the >> RFC3261 this morning. >> >> > Never the less, I'll find time to make the domain rewrite for from >> > configurable via B2BUA Route as well. >> >> Please wait. I found something confusing today which I cannot explain >> yet. I disabled the "Rewrite-Request-URI" and "Rewrite-TO-URI" and >> things start working. The from field value ist replaced with the target >> domain (abc.net) while the to: field remains unchanged and contains the >> local domain value (xyz.net). >> >> I' m totally confused now - I need to overthink that and come back to >> you as soon as I verified the scenario. >> >> Regards, >> >> Andre >> >> >> jo...@op... schrieb: >> >>> Andre, >>> >>> I am 50/50 on this one. Half of the argument is as you have already >>> stated in this post. The other half is, this is the first time I have >>> encountered a GW that filters INVITE based on the from header. From is >>> a very weak form of identity assertion since it can be forged very >>> easily using any softphone. This is not mentioning that RFC 3261 not >>> only allows From to be forged easily but also allows it to be >>> anonymized. For example sip:ano...@an...valid to indicate >>> that you want your identity to be private is aperfectly valid from >>> header. Thus, an implementation that relies on From to assert identity >>> is tantamount to a multitude of interoperability issues. >>> >>> Never the less, I'll find time to make the domain rewrite for from >>> configurable via B2BUA Route as well. I guess these sorts of issues is >>> the main reason why SBC's are invented anyway. >>> >>> Joegen >>> >>> Andre Mamitzsch wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I just need some clarification regarding the domain rewriting concept of >>>> the OpenSBC. >>>> >>>> We are using the SBC in upper registration mode. The upper registration >>>> works fine, all register messages are "hijacked" and domain rewriting is >>>> performed. So, everything is fine here. >>>> >>>> >>>> If I try to place a call, I receive the message "forbidden AOR" since no >>>> rewriting in the From: field is performed while the domain in the To: >>>> is replaced as expected. >>>> >>>> In my opinion, the local domain (xyz.net) should be replaced by the >>>> target domain (abc.net) in the From: as well. Or am I wrong here ? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Andre >>>> >>>> Our setup: >>>> >>>> >>>> +--------+ +-------+ +---------+ >>>> + SIP UA +------------------+ oSBC +-------------------+ SIP Net + >>>> +--------+ +-------+ +---------+ >>>> 192.168.10.3 10.70.3.200 10.70.5.85 >>>> 12...@si... sip.abc.net >>>> >>>> >>>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.384 DTL: [CID=0x0e3e] ICT(3121173204) >>>> Event(SIPMessage) - SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>> >>>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.384 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] TRANSACTION: (ICT) SIP/2.0 403 >>>> Forbidden AOR State: 3 >>>> >>>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 INF: [CID=0x0e3e] >>> ACK sip:78...@si... >>>> SIP/2.0 DST: 10.70.5.85:5060:UDP SRC: 10.70.3.200:5060 enc=0 bytes=656 >>>> >>>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] >>>> >>>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] ACK sip:78...@si... SIP/2.0 >>>> >>>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] From: "123456" >>>> <sip:12...@si...>;tag=ed94ab1c >>>> >>>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] To: "789123" >>>> <sip:78...@si...>;tag=1_1146_t160890_14h5 >>>> >>>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> 10.70.3.200:5060;iid=22771;branch=z9hG4bK4ec38706668edd119c5bdb9c33a35a27;uas-addr=10.70.5.85;rport >>>> >>>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] CSeq: 1 ACK >>>> >>>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Call-ID: >>>> ZTMzZjllOTQ1M2UwZGI0YWY2OGRlNjJjNTE2MGZmOTc.-0x0004 >>>> >>>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Contact: >>>> <sip:123456@10.70.3.200:5060> >>>> >>>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] User-Agent: OpenSBC v1.1.5-13 >>>> >>>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Max-Forwards: 70 >>>> >>>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, >>>> OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO >>>> >>>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Supported: timer >>>> >>>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Session-Expires: 1800 >>>> >>>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Min-SE: 90 >>>> >>>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Content-Length: 0 >>>> >>>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] >>>> >>>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge >>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes >>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>> ope...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> >>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>>> Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.7.5/1702 - Release Date: 10/1/2008 9:05 AM >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge >>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes >>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge >> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes >> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFI61SIQKZIuVrbkWoRAmYkAJ499q3C8J94fe6kOO3nM0fVr46IiwCfcnW+ > cRvR/59pqaqnzhqiilg0B84= > =WEQ/ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.7.6/1711 - Release Date: 10/6/2008 5:37 PM > > |
|
From: André M. <an...@ma...> - 2008-10-07 12:49:24
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello Joegen, the rewrite of the domain in the from field seems to work until 1.1.5-10. After that, and I compiled almost everything what I could get from CVS, it is not working anymore. I tried to have a look at the differences in order to find out why it changed and what was changed. I could identify that in Version 1.28 of the Router.cxx the Feature: Router.cxx: * Added feature to rewrite the FROM domain to a specific domain in the B2BUA routes was added. At the moment I' m unable to find a good starting point - if you could give me a small hint please... Andre Andre Mamitzsch schrieb: > Hello Joegen, > > thanks for your reply. I'm with you regarding the 50/50 - I checked the > RFC3261 this morning. > > > Never the less, I'll find time to make the domain rewrite for from > > configurable via B2BUA Route as well. > > Please wait. I found something confusing today which I cannot explain > yet. I disabled the "Rewrite-Request-URI" and "Rewrite-TO-URI" and > things start working. The from field value ist replaced with the target > domain (abc.net) while the to: field remains unchanged and contains the > local domain value (xyz.net). > > I' m totally confused now - I need to overthink that and come back to > you as soon as I verified the scenario. > > Regards, > > Andre > > > jo...@op... schrieb: >> Andre, >> >> I am 50/50 on this one. Half of the argument is as you have already >> stated in this post. The other half is, this is the first time I have >> encountered a GW that filters INVITE based on the from header. From is >> a very weak form of identity assertion since it can be forged very >> easily using any softphone. This is not mentioning that RFC 3261 not >> only allows From to be forged easily but also allows it to be >> anonymized. For example sip:ano...@an...valid to indicate >> that you want your identity to be private is aperfectly valid from >> header. Thus, an implementation that relies on From to assert identity >> is tantamount to a multitude of interoperability issues. >> >> Never the less, I'll find time to make the domain rewrite for from >> configurable via B2BUA Route as well. I guess these sorts of issues is >> the main reason why SBC's are invented anyway. >> >> Joegen >> >> Andre Mamitzsch wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I just need some clarification regarding the domain rewriting concept of >>> the OpenSBC. >>> >>> We are using the SBC in upper registration mode. The upper registration >>> works fine, all register messages are "hijacked" and domain rewriting is >>> performed. So, everything is fine here. >>> >>> >>> If I try to place a call, I receive the message "forbidden AOR" since no >>> rewriting in the From: field is performed while the domain in the To: >>> is replaced as expected. >>> >>> In my opinion, the local domain (xyz.net) should be replaced by the >>> target domain (abc.net) in the From: as well. Or am I wrong here ? >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Andre >>> >>> Our setup: >>> >>> >>> +--------+ +-------+ +---------+ >>> + SIP UA +------------------+ oSBC +-------------------+ SIP Net + >>> +--------+ +-------+ +---------+ >>> 192.168.10.3 10.70.3.200 10.70.5.85 >>> 12...@si... sip.abc.net >>> >>> >>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.384 DTL: [CID=0x0e3e] ICT(3121173204) >>> Event(SIPMessage) - SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>> >>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.384 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] TRANSACTION: (ICT) SIP/2.0 403 >>> Forbidden AOR State: 3 >>> >>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 INF: [CID=0x0e3e] >>> ACK sip:78...@si... >>> SIP/2.0 DST: 10.70.5.85:5060:UDP SRC: 10.70.3.200:5060 enc=0 bytes=656 >>> >>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] >>> >>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] ACK sip:78...@si... SIP/2.0 >>> >>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] From: "123456" >>> <sip:12...@si...>;tag=ed94ab1c >>> >>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] To: "789123" >>> <sip:78...@si...>;tag=1_1146_t160890_14h5 >>> >>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>> 10.70.3.200:5060;iid=22771;branch=z9hG4bK4ec38706668edd119c5bdb9c33a35a27;uas-addr=10.70.5.85;rport >>> >>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] CSeq: 1 ACK >>> >>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Call-ID: >>> ZTMzZjllOTQ1M2UwZGI0YWY2OGRlNjJjNTE2MGZmOTc.-0x0004 >>> >>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Contact: >>> <sip:123456@10.70.3.200:5060> >>> >>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] User-Agent: OpenSBC v1.1.5-13 >>> >>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Max-Forwards: 70 >>> >>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, >>> OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO >>> >>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Supported: timer >>> >>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Session-Expires: 1800 >>> >>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Min-SE: 90 >>> >>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Content-Length: 0 >>> >>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] >>> >>> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge >>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes >>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>> Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.7.5/1702 - Release Date: 10/1/2008 9:05 AM >>> >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge >> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes >> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFI61SIQKZIuVrbkWoRAmYkAJ499q3C8J94fe6kOO3nM0fVr46IiwCfcnW+ cRvR/59pqaqnzhqiilg0B84= =WEQ/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: OpenSIPStack F. <ope...@op...> - 2008-10-07 09:21:23
|
i was just trying to figure out a way to compile opensipstack with that openssl support but cant seem to get it working only as cant figure out the directory structure of openssl and the required directory structure of opensipstack. Secondly if some how it managed to compile opesipstack to use openssl then can it support the ssl method of voip used by linksys spa3102 ATA and snom TLS and if so then can it decrypt that signalling and media and send ahead to gateways, softswitches in upper registration mode? |
|
From: Andre M. <an...@ma...> - 2008-10-06 20:02:44
|
Hello Joegen, I have tested upper reg against the latest CVS version - it is working as expected. Many thanks for solving the issue. Andre Joegen E. Baclor schrieb: > Hi Andre, > > I commited a big patch for upper-reg. Can you test the latest if you > still encounter your problem? Let me know if it persists. > > Joegen > > Andre Mamitzsch wrote: >> Hello Joegen, >> >> I just compiled the latest opensbc version from CVS. It seems that the >> previously fixed issue with the upper registration reappeared in this >> version. The upper registration is executed, but the domain rewriting is not >> performed. Would you be so kind and have a look at this ? >> >> Regards, >> >> Andre >> >> >> >> >> Am 12.09.08 18:54 schrieb "André Mamitzsch" unter <an...@ma...>: >> >> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Hi Joegen, >>> >>> I can confirm that upper-reg is working now, many thanks again. >>> >>> >>> Andre >>> >>> >>> André Mamitzsch schrieb: >>> >>>> Hi Joegen, >>>> >>>> that sounds great, many thanks ! I will test it right now and let you know. >>>> >>>> Andre >>>> >>>> jo...@op... schrieb: >>>> >>>>> Andre, >>>>> >>>>> This should now be fixed in CVS. Can you try and let me know? >>>>> >>>>> Joegen >>>>> >>>>> jo...@op... wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Andre, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for the info. I will try to replicate this. I'll get back to >>>>>> you when a patch is ready. >>>>>> >>>>>> Joegen >>>>>> >>>>>> Andre Mamitzsch wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Joegen E. Baclor schrieb: >>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> Andre, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This time in response to your thread. My questions inline... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Joegen E. Baclor wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [snipped] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Joegen, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> thanks for the quick reply and the confirmation. It seems to me that the >>>>>>>>> rewriting is not working anymore. >>>>>>>>> If I try to register my devices, the FROM: and TO: fields are not being >>>>>>>>> touched and stay the same. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> As far as I can remember, Upper-Reg never touches the from and to >>>>>>>>>> headers except for an undocumented "domain" parameter in the route >>>>>>>>>> entry. Is this what you are referring to by any chance? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> Yes,I think so. In the UpperReg section, I have checked the boxes to >>>>> rewrite the from and to domain. I also added the "domain=xyz.de" parameter. >>>>> >>>>> Here is the entry from the UpperReg section: >>>>> >>>>> [sip:*@xyz.net] sip:sip.abc.net;domain=sip.abc.net >>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> The softswitch therfore replies with an >>>>>>>>> "SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR". >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> By softswitch do you mean your registrar? Can you double check if it >>>>>>>>>> isn't OpenSBC that generated this 403 locally? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> the forbidden AOR is generated by the registrar. That's because the >>>>> OpenSBC does not rewrite the from and to domain name. >>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> If I find some time during the day, I will dig into it, do a little bit >>>>>>>>> more debugging and let you know what I have found. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Explaining your setup using a ladder diagram plus level 5 log MAY tell >>>>>>>>>> us more what went wrong. Would you be able to send it? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> ____________ ____________ ___________ >>>>> | | sip.xyz.net | | sip.abc.net | | >>>>> | SIP Client |--------------|OpenSBC |-------------| Registrar | >>>>> |____________| |____________| |___________| >>>>> 192.168.10.3 10.70.3.200 10.232.4.85 >>>>> 10.232.4.69 >>>>> >>>> >>>>> The name "sip.xyz.net" is resolved to the IP 10.70.3.200 >>>>> The name "sip.abc.net" is resolved to the IP 10.232.4.69 or 10.232.4.85 >>>>> >>>>> The client tries to register with the following parameters: >>>>> >>>>> SIP Username: 123456 >>>>> SIP Domain: sip.xyz.net >>>>> >>>>> Authentication Username: something >>>>> Authentication Password: something else >>>>> >>>> >>>>> The registrar has the following setup for that user: >>>>> >>>>> SIP Username: 123456 >>>>> SIP Domain: sip.abc.net >>>>> >>>>> Authentication Username: something >>>>> Authentication Password: something else >>>>> >>>> >>>>> Here is what we want to do: >>>>> >>>>> The real domain of our Registrar should be hidden as best as possible. >>>>> The reason is that we have a couple of resellers which offer the service >>>>> to their customers and therefore want to have their own branding for the >>>>> service. >>>>> >>>> >>>>> In previous versions of the OpenSBC, this setup worked well. The client >>>>> sent the register, the OpenSBC replaced the domain "sip.xyz.net" with >>>>> "sip.abc.net", the authentication took place and we were able to make >>>>> phonecalls. >>>>> >>>>> I would appreciate an advise where to look first in order to find the >>>>> problem. >>>>> >>>>> Here is the sbc.ini >>>>> >>>>> [OpenSBC-General-Parameters] >>>>> SIP-Log-Level=5 >>>>> PTRACE-Log-Level=5 >>>>> Log-File-Prefix=b2bua >>>>> SBC-Application-Mode=B2BUpperReg Mode >>>>> Interface-Address Array Size=0 >>>>> Enable-Backdoor-Port=True >>>>> Enable-Trunk-Port=True >>>>> Enable-Calea-Port=True >>>>> RTP-Min-Port=30000 >>>>> RTP-Max-Port=35000 >>>>> Enable-Local-Refer=False >>>>> Max-Forwards=70 >>>>> Encryption-Mode=XOR >>>>> Encryption-Key=GS >>>>> Transaction-Thread-Count=10 >>>>> Session-Thread-Count=10 >>>>> Alerting-Timeout=30000 >>>>> Seize-Timeout=60000 >>>>> SIP-Timer-H=Default >>>>> Session-Keep-Alive=1800 >>>>> Session-Max-Life-Span=10800 >>>>> Max-Concurrent-Session=100 >>>>> >>>>> [Upper-Registration] >>>>> Rewrite-TO-Domain=True >>>>> Rewrite-FROM-Domain=True >>>>> Route-List Array Size=1 >>>>> Route-List 1=[sip:*@xyz.net] sip:sip.abc.net;domain=sip.abc.net >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Here is the required trace: >>>>> >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 INF: [CID=0x0e84] <<< REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net >>>>> SIP/2.0 SRC: 192.168.10.3:7344:UDP enc=0 bytes=603 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net >>>>> SIP/2.0 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] From: "123456" >>>>> <sip:12...@si...>;tag=5b2f4a5c >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] To: "123456" >>>>> <sip:12...@si...> >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>> 192.168.10.3:7344;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf4488886f02b-1---d8754z- >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] CSeq: 1 REGISTER >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Call-ID: >>>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI. >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Contact: >>>>> <sip:123456@192.168.10.3:7344;rinstance=001e862ffef9c5cd> >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] User-Agent: X-Lite >>>>> release 1014k stamp 47051 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Expires: 1800 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Max-Forwards: 70 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Allow: INVITE, ACK, >>>>> CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Supported: timer >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Content-Length: 0 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.734 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Finding transaction for >>>>> REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.735 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Setting Transaction ID to >>>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf4488886f02b >>>>> -1---d8754z-|REGISTER >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.735 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.735 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] *** CREATING TRANSACTION >>>>> (NIST) *** >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.735 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Message: REGISTER >>>>> sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.735 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Call-Id: >>>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI. >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.735 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.736 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NIST(1274519418) *** >>>>> CREATED *** - >>>>> NIST|ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf448888 >>>>> 6f02b-1---d8754z-|REGISTER >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.737 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NIST(1274519418) >>>>> Event(SIPMessage) - REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.738 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] TRANSACTION: (NIST) REGISTER >>>>> sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 State: 0 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.739 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NIST(1274519418) >>>>> StateIdle->StateTrying >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.748 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Finding transaction for >>>>> REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.748 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Setting Transaction ID to >>>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e69fe7 >>>>> 80e6bacb|REGISTER >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.749 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.749 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] *** CREATING TRANSACTION >>>>> (NICT) *** >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.749 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Message: REGISTER >>>>> sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.749 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Call-Id: >>>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI. >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.749 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.750 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) *** >>>>> CREATED *** - >>>>> NICT|ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e >>>>> 69fe780e6bacb|REGISTER >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.751 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) >>>>> Event(SIPMessage) - REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.751 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] TRANSACTION: (NICT) REGISTER >>>>> sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 State: 0 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.752 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) >>>>> StateIdle->StateTrying(REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0) >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.752 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Timer E( >>>>> 500 ms ) STARTED >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.752 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Timer F( >>>>> 10000 ms ) STARTED >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.757 INF: [CID=0x0e84] >>> REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net >>>>> SIP/2.0 DST: 10.232.4.69:5060:UDP SRC: 10.70.3.200:5060 enc=0 bytes=825 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net >>>>> SIP/2.0 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] From: "123456" >>>>> <sip:12...@si...>;tag=5b2f4a5c >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] To: "123456" >>>>> <sip:12...@si...> >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>> 10.70.3.200:5060;branch=z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e69fe780e6bacb;uas-addr=10. >>>>> 232.4.69;x-reg-id=c2lwOjAzNDEzNTUyNTUyMUAxOTIuMTY4LjE3OC42NDo3MzQ0 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>> 192.168.10.3:7344;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf4488886f02b-1---d8754z-;rport=7 >>>>> 344;received=192.168.10.3 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] CSeq: 1 REGISTER >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Call-ID: >>>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI. >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Contact: >>>>> <sip:123456@10.70.3.200:5062;x-reg-id=sip%3A192.168.10.3%3A7344;rinstance=00 >>>>> 1e862ffef9c5cd> >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] User-Agent: X-Lite >>>>> release 1014k stamp 47051 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Expires: 1800 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Max-Forwards: 70 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Allow: INVITE, ACK, >>>>> CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Supported: timer >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Content-Length: 0 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.760 PWL: [CID=0x0000] Using Iface: 10.70.3.200 to >>>>> send to Dest: 10.232.4.69 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 INF: [CID=0x0e84] <<< SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>>> SRC: 10.232.4.69:5060:UDP enc=0 bytes=571 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] From: "123456" >>>>> <sip:12...@si...>;tag=5b2f4a5c >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] To: "123456" >>>>> <sip:12...@si...>;tag=1_1146_t12083_6eo6 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>> 10.70.3.200:5060;branch=z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e69fe780e6bacb;uas-addr=10. >>>>> 232.4.69;x-reg-id=c2lwOjAzNDEzNTUyNTUyMUAxOTIuMTY4LjE3OC42NDo3MzQ0;received= >>>>> 10.70.3.200 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>> 192.168.10.3:7344;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf4488886f02b-1---d8754z-;rport=7 >>>>> 344;received=192.168.10.3 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] CSeq: 1 REGISTER >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Call-ID: >>>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI. >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Content-Length: 0 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.773 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Finding transaction for >>>>> SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.774 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Setting Transaction ID to >>>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e69fe7 >>>>> 80e6bacb|REGISTER >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.774 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] Found >>>>> NICT|ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e >>>>> 69fe780e6bacb|REGISTER >>>>> for SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.776 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) >>>>> Event(SIPMessage) - SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.776 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] TRANSACTION: (NICT) SIP/2.0 >>>>> 403 Forbidden AOR State: 1 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.776 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) >>>>> StateTrying->StateCompleted >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.776 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Timer E >>>>> STOPPED >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.776 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Timer F >>>>> STOPPED >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.777 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Finding transaction for >>>>> SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.778 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Setting Transaction ID to >>>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf4488886f02b >>>>> -1---d8754z-|REGISTER >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.778 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] Found >>>>> NIST|ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf448888 >>>>> 6f02b-1---d8754z-|REGISTER >>>>> for SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.779 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Timer K( >>>>> 5000 ms ) STARTED >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.780 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NIST(1274519418) >>>>> Event(SIPMessage) - SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.780 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] TRANSACTION: (NIST) SIP/2.0 >>>>> 403 Forbidden AOR State: 1 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.781 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] >>>>> NIST(1274519418)HandleStateTrying->StateCompleted >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 INF: [CID=0x0e84] >>> SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>>> DST: 192.168.10.3:7344:UDP SRC: 10.70.3.200:5060 enc=0 bytes=389 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] From: "123456" >>>>> <sip:12...@si...>;tag=5b2f4a5c >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] To: "123456" >>>>> <sip:12...@si...>;tag=1_1146_t12083_6eo6 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>>> 192.168.10.3:7344;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf4488886f02b-1---d8754z-;rport=7 >>>>> 344;received=192.168.10.3 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] CSeq: 1 REGISTER >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Call-ID: >>>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI. >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Content-Length: 0 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.786 PWL: [CID=0x0000] Using Iface: 10.70.3.200 to >>>>> send to Dest: 192.168.10.3 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.788 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NIST(1274519418) Timer J( >>>>> 32000 ms ) STARTED >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.769 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Timer K( >>>>> 5000 ms ) EXPIRED >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.770 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Event( >>>>> Timer-K ) Interval: 5000 >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.771 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Event(Final) >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.771 DTL: [CID=0x0000] *** REMOVED TRANSACTION *** >>>>> NICT|ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e >>>>> 69fe780e6bacb|REGISTER >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.772 DBG: [CID=0x0000] GC: First Stale Object >>>>> SIPTransaction >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.773 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] TRANSACTION: (NICT) DESTROYED >>>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.773 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) *** >>>>> DESTROYED *** - >>>>> NICT|ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e >>>>> 69fe780e6bacb|REGISTER >>>>> >>>> >>>>> Many thanks in advance. >>>>> >>>> >>>>> Andre >>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> Andre >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> jo...@op... schrieb: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Andre, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, the new code are in. What kind of issue are you bumping into? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joegen >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> André Mamitzsch wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Joegen, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a couple of issues with the upper registration in my test >>>>>>>>>>>>>> lab. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Before I start troubleshooting - can you confirm that the new code >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> committed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andre >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> jo...@op... schrieb: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have recently committed code for shared line appearance (SLA) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> would render upper registration to temporarily not function (Local >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reg >>>>>>>>>>>>>> should be ok). This is just temporarily until I've committed the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> revised code for upper reg which is anticipated to be completed by >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomorrow. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joegen >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>>>>>>>>>>> challenge >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win >>>>>>>>>>>>>> great prizes >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the world >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ope...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------>>>>>>> >> - >> >>>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>>>>>> challenge >>>>>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>>>>>>> prizes >>>>>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >>>>>>>>> world >>>>>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>>>>>> ope...@li... >>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>>>>>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>>>>>>>> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.19/1660 - Release Date: >>>>>>>>> 9/8/2008 6:39 PM >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>>>>>>>>>>> challenge >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win >>>>>>>>>>>>>> great prizes >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the world >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ope...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge >>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>>> prizes >>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>> ope...@li... >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>>>> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.19/1663 - Release Date: >>>>> 9/9/2008 7:04 PM >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>>>>>>>> challenge >>>>>>>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>>>>>>>>> prizes >>>>>>>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >>>>>>>>>>> world >>>>>>>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> ope...@li... >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>>>>>>>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>>>>>>>>>> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.19/1665 - Release Date: >>>>>>>>>>> 9/10/2008 7:00 PM >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>>>>>>> challenge >>>>>>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>>>>>>>> prizes >>>>>>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >>>>>>>>>> world >>>>>>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>>>>>>> ope...@li... >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------->>>>>>>> >> - >> >>>>>>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>>>>>>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>>>>>>>>> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.19/1665 - Release Date: >>>>>>>>>> 9/10/2008 7:00 PM >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------>>>>>>> >> - >> >>>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>>>>>> challenge >>>>>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>>>>>>> prizes >>>>>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >>>>>>>>> world >>>>>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>>>>>> ope...@li... >>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge >>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>> prizes >>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>> ope...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>>> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.21/1667 - Release Date: >>>> 9/11/2008 6:55 PM >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>>> challenge >>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>>>> prizes >>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>>> ope...@li... >>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>>>>> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.21/1667 - Release Date: 9/11/2008 >>>>>> 6:55 PM >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge >>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>>> prizes >>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>> ope...@li... >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>> >>> - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge >>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>> prizes >>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) >>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org >>> >>> iD8DBQFIyp7CQKZIuVrbkWoRAhmMAJ9RTlOvn3MQpxkmVOVbFOEKCeduUwCeKlPL >>> Kr/DcxtdVMoAxImk4PXsWKg= >>> =4Pfw >>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> >>> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge >> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes >> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.7.4/1695 - Release Date: 9/27/2008 1:11 PM >> >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel |
|
From: Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...> - 2008-10-05 01:01:20
|
Hi Ronald, The log will be very helpful. If you can send me the last 1000 lines of the log offlist, so much the better. Joegen Ronald de Jesus wrote: > Hi Joegen, > > This is the previous problem with osbc that crashes using the version > 1.1.5-4 (Release-Date: May 15 2008 01:46:55). I notice that after the > osbc crash, it shows the following: > > bash-3.00$ terminate called after throwing an instance of > 'std::length_error' > what(): basic_string::replace > > > Im not sure if this can help to find out the problem. Unfortunately > there was no core logs generate after the crash. Let me know if the > b2bua logs is needed so I can send it in separate email. > > Regards, > Ron > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > |
|
From: Andre M. <an...@ma...> - 2008-10-02 13:12:58
|
Hello Joegen, thanks for your reply. I'm with you regarding the 50/50 - I checked the RFC3261 this morning. > Never the less, I'll find time to make the domain rewrite for from > configurable via B2BUA Route as well. Please wait. I found something confusing today which I cannot explain yet. I disabled the "Rewrite-Request-URI" and "Rewrite-TO-URI" and things start working. The from field value ist replaced with the target domain (abc.net) while the to: field remains unchanged and contains the local domain value (xyz.net). I' m totally confused now - I need to overthink that and come back to you as soon as I verified the scenario. Regards, Andre jo...@op... schrieb: > Andre, > > I am 50/50 on this one. Half of the argument is as you have already > stated in this post. The other half is, this is the first time I have > encountered a GW that filters INVITE based on the from header. From is > a very weak form of identity assertion since it can be forged very > easily using any softphone. This is not mentioning that RFC 3261 not > only allows From to be forged easily but also allows it to be > anonymized. For example sip:ano...@an...valid to indicate > that you want your identity to be private is aperfectly valid from > header. Thus, an implementation that relies on From to assert identity > is tantamount to a multitude of interoperability issues. > > Never the less, I'll find time to make the domain rewrite for from > configurable via B2BUA Route as well. I guess these sorts of issues is > the main reason why SBC's are invented anyway. > > Joegen > > Andre Mamitzsch wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I just need some clarification regarding the domain rewriting concept of >> the OpenSBC. >> >> We are using the SBC in upper registration mode. The upper registration >> works fine, all register messages are "hijacked" and domain rewriting is >> performed. So, everything is fine here. >> >> >> If I try to place a call, I receive the message "forbidden AOR" since no >> rewriting in the From: field is performed while the domain in the To: >> is replaced as expected. >> >> In my opinion, the local domain (xyz.net) should be replaced by the >> target domain (abc.net) in the From: as well. Or am I wrong here ? >> >> Regards, >> >> Andre >> >> Our setup: >> >> >> +--------+ +-------+ +---------+ >> + SIP UA +------------------+ oSBC +-------------------+ SIP Net + >> +--------+ +-------+ +---------+ >> 192.168.10.3 10.70.3.200 10.70.5.85 >> 12...@si... sip.abc.net >> >> >> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.384 DTL: [CID=0x0e3e] ICT(3121173204) >> Event(SIPMessage) - SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >> >> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.384 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] TRANSACTION: (ICT) SIP/2.0 403 >> Forbidden AOR State: 3 >> >> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 INF: [CID=0x0e3e] >>> ACK sip:78...@si... >> SIP/2.0 DST: 10.70.5.85:5060:UDP SRC: 10.70.3.200:5060 enc=0 bytes=656 >> >> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] >> >> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] ACK sip:78...@si... SIP/2.0 >> >> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] From: "123456" >> <sip:12...@si...>;tag=ed94ab1c >> >> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] To: "789123" >> <sip:78...@si...>;tag=1_1146_t160890_14h5 >> >> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> 10.70.3.200:5060;iid=22771;branch=z9hG4bK4ec38706668edd119c5bdb9c33a35a27;uas-addr=10.70.5.85;rport >> >> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] CSeq: 1 ACK >> >> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Call-ID: >> ZTMzZjllOTQ1M2UwZGI0YWY2OGRlNjJjNTE2MGZmOTc.-0x0004 >> >> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Contact: >> <sip:123456@10.70.3.200:5060> >> >> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] User-Agent: OpenSBC v1.1.5-13 >> >> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Max-Forwards: 70 >> >> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, >> OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO >> >> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Supported: timer >> >> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Session-Expires: 1800 >> >> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Min-SE: 90 >> >> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Content-Length: 0 >> >> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] >> >> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge >> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes >> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >> Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.7.5/1702 - Release Date: 10/1/2008 9:05 AM >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel |
|
From: <jo...@op...> - 2008-10-02 02:02:16
|
Andre, I am 50/50 on this one. Half of the argument is as you have already stated in this post. The other half is, this is the first time I have encountered a GW that filters INVITE based on the from header. From is a very weak form of identity assertion since it can be forged very easily using any softphone. This is not mentioning that RFC 3261 not only allows From to be forged easily but also allows it to be anonymized. For example sip:ano...@an...valid to indicate that you want your identity to be private is aperfectly valid from header. Thus, an implementation that relies on From to assert identity is tantamount to a multitude of interoperability issues. Never the less, I'll find time to make the domain rewrite for from configurable via B2BUA Route as well. I guess these sorts of issues is the main reason why SBC's are invented anyway. Joegen Andre Mamitzsch wrote: > Hi, > > I just need some clarification regarding the domain rewriting concept of > the OpenSBC. > > We are using the SBC in upper registration mode. The upper registration > works fine, all register messages are "hijacked" and domain rewriting is > performed. So, everything is fine here. > > > If I try to place a call, I receive the message "forbidden AOR" since no > rewriting in the From: field is performed while the domain in the To: > is replaced as expected. > > In my opinion, the local domain (xyz.net) should be replaced by the > target domain (abc.net) in the From: as well. Or am I wrong here ? > > Regards, > > Andre > > Our setup: > > > +--------+ +-------+ +---------+ > + SIP UA +------------------+ oSBC +-------------------+ SIP Net + > +--------+ +-------+ +---------+ > 192.168.10.3 10.70.3.200 10.70.5.85 > 12...@si... sip.abc.net > > > 2008/10/01 22:35:05.384 DTL: [CID=0x0e3e] ICT(3121173204) > Event(SIPMessage) - SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR > > 2008/10/01 22:35:05.384 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] TRANSACTION: (ICT) SIP/2.0 403 > Forbidden AOR State: 3 > > 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 INF: [CID=0x0e3e] >>> ACK sip:78...@si... > SIP/2.0 DST: 10.70.5.85:5060:UDP SRC: 10.70.3.200:5060 enc=0 bytes=656 > > 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] > > 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] ACK sip:78...@si... SIP/2.0 > > 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] From: "123456" > <sip:12...@si...>;tag=ed94ab1c > > 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] To: "789123" > <sip:78...@si...>;tag=1_1146_t160890_14h5 > > 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 10.70.3.200:5060;iid=22771;branch=z9hG4bK4ec38706668edd119c5bdb9c33a35a27;uas-addr=10.70.5.85;rport > > 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] CSeq: 1 ACK > > 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Call-ID: > ZTMzZjllOTQ1M2UwZGI0YWY2OGRlNjJjNTE2MGZmOTc.-0x0004 > > 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Contact: > <sip:123456@10.70.3.200:5060> > > 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] User-Agent: OpenSBC v1.1.5-13 > > 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Max-Forwards: 70 > > 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, > OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO > > 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Supported: timer > > 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Session-Expires: 1800 > > 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Min-SE: 90 > > 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Content-Length: 0 > > 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] > > 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.7.5/1702 - Release Date: 10/1/2008 9:05 AM > > |
|
From: Andre M. <an...@ma...> - 2008-10-01 21:04:57
|
Hi, I just need some clarification regarding the domain rewriting concept of the OpenSBC. We are using the SBC in upper registration mode. The upper registration works fine, all register messages are "hijacked" and domain rewriting is performed. So, everything is fine here. If I try to place a call, I receive the message "forbidden AOR" since no rewriting in the From: field is performed while the domain in the To: is replaced as expected. In my opinion, the local domain (xyz.net) should be replaced by the target domain (abc.net) in the From: as well. Or am I wrong here ? Regards, Andre Our setup: +--------+ +-------+ +---------+ + SIP UA +------------------+ oSBC +-------------------+ SIP Net + +--------+ +-------+ +---------+ 192.168.10.3 10.70.3.200 10.70.5.85 12...@si... sip.abc.net 2008/10/01 22:35:05.384 DTL: [CID=0x0e3e] ICT(3121173204) Event(SIPMessage) - SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR 2008/10/01 22:35:05.384 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] TRANSACTION: (ICT) SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR State: 3 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 INF: [CID=0x0e3e] >>> ACK sip:78...@si... SIP/2.0 DST: 10.70.5.85:5060:UDP SRC: 10.70.3.200:5060 enc=0 bytes=656 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] ACK sip:78...@si... SIP/2.0 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] From: "123456" <sip:12...@si...>;tag=ed94ab1c 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] To: "789123" <sip:78...@si...>;tag=1_1146_t160890_14h5 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.70.3.200:5060;iid=22771;branch=z9hG4bK4ec38706668edd119c5bdb9c33a35a27;uas-addr=10.70.5.85;rport 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] CSeq: 1 ACK 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Call-ID: ZTMzZjllOTQ1M2UwZGI0YWY2OGRlNjJjNTE2MGZmOTc.-0x0004 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Contact: <sip:123456@10.70.3.200:5060> 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] User-Agent: OpenSBC v1.1.5-13 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Max-Forwards: 70 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Supported: timer 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Session-Expires: 1800 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Min-SE: 90 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] Content-Length: 0 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] 2008/10/01 22:35:05.385 DBG: [CID=0x0e3e] |
|
From: Andre M. <an...@ma...> - 2008-10-01 20:43:28
|
Hi Joegen, I just compiled the latest version from CVS (1.5-13). Upper Registration seems to work again. Regards, Andre Andre Mamitzsch schrieb: > Hello Joegen, > > I just compiled the latest opensbc version from CVS. It seems that the > previously fixed issue with the upper registration reappeared in this > version. The upper registration is executed, but the domain rewriting is not > performed. Would you be so kind and have a look at this ? > > Regards, > > Andre > > > > > Am 12.09.08 18:54 schrieb "André Mamitzsch" unter <an...@ma...>: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hi Joegen, >> >> I can confirm that upper-reg is working now, many thanks again. >> >> >> Andre >> >> >> André Mamitzsch schrieb: >>> Hi Joegen, >>> >>> that sounds great, many thanks ! I will test it right now and let you know. >>> >>> Andre >>> >>> jo...@op... schrieb: >>>> Andre, >>>> This should now be fixed in CVS. Can you try and let me know? >>>> Joegen >>>> jo...@op... wrote: >>>>> Andre, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for the info. I will try to replicate this. I'll get back to >>>>> you when a patch is ready. >>>>> >>>>> Joegen >>>>> >>>>> Andre Mamitzsch wrote: >>>>> >>>> Joegen E. Baclor schrieb: >>> >>>>>>>> Andre, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This time in response to your thread. My questions inline... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Joegen E. Baclor wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [snipped] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Joegen, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> thanks for the quick reply and the confirmation. It seems to me that the >>>>>>>> rewriting is not working anymore. >>>>>>>> If I try to register my devices, the FROM: and TO: fields are not being >>>>>>>> touched and stay the same. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As far as I can remember, Upper-Reg never touches the from and to >>>>>>>>> headers except for an undocumented "domain" parameter in the route >>>>>>>>> entry. Is this what you are referring to by any chance? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> Yes,I think so. In the UpperReg section, I have checked the boxes to >>>> rewrite the from and to domain. I also added the "domain=xyz.de" parameter. >>>> Here is the entry from the UpperReg section: >>>> [sip:*@xyz.net] sip:sip.abc.net;domain=sip.abc.net >>> >>>>>>>> The softswitch therfore replies with an >>>>>>>> "SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> By softswitch do you mean your registrar? Can you double check if it >>>>>>>>> isn't OpenSBC that generated this 403 locally? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> the forbidden AOR is generated by the registrar. That's because the >>>> OpenSBC does not rewrite the from and to domain name. >>> >>>>>>>> If I find some time during the day, I will dig into it, do a little bit >>>>>>>> more debugging and let you know what I have found. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Explaining your setup using a ladder diagram plus level 5 log MAY tell >>>>>>>>> us more what went wrong. Would you be able to send it? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> ____________ ____________ ___________ >>>> | | sip.xyz.net | | sip.abc.net | | >>>> | SIP Client |--------------|OpenSBC |-------------| Registrar | >>>> |____________| |____________| |___________| >>>> 192.168.10.3 10.70.3.200 10.232.4.85 >>>> 10.232.4.69 >>> >>>> The name "sip.xyz.net" is resolved to the IP 10.70.3.200 >>>> The name "sip.abc.net" is resolved to the IP 10.232.4.69 or 10.232.4.85 >>>> The client tries to register with the following parameters: >>>> SIP Username: 123456 >>>> SIP Domain: sip.xyz.net >>>> Authentication Username: something >>>> Authentication Password: something else >>> >>>> The registrar has the following setup for that user: >>>> SIP Username: 123456 >>>> SIP Domain: sip.abc.net >>>> Authentication Username: something >>>> Authentication Password: something else >>> >>>> Here is what we want to do: >>>> The real domain of our Registrar should be hidden as best as possible. >>>> The reason is that we have a couple of resellers which offer the service >>>> to their customers and therefore want to have their own branding for the >>>> service. >>> >>>> In previous versions of the OpenSBC, this setup worked well. The client >>>> sent the register, the OpenSBC replaced the domain "sip.xyz.net" with >>>> "sip.abc.net", the authentication took place and we were able to make >>>> phonecalls. >>>> I would appreciate an advise where to look first in order to find the >>>> problem. >>>> Here is the sbc.ini >>>> [OpenSBC-General-Parameters] >>>> SIP-Log-Level=5 >>>> PTRACE-Log-Level=5 >>>> Log-File-Prefix=b2bua >>>> SBC-Application-Mode=B2BUpperReg Mode >>>> Interface-Address Array Size=0 >>>> Enable-Backdoor-Port=True >>>> Enable-Trunk-Port=True >>>> Enable-Calea-Port=True >>>> RTP-Min-Port=30000 >>>> RTP-Max-Port=35000 >>>> Enable-Local-Refer=False >>>> Max-Forwards=70 >>>> Encryption-Mode=XOR >>>> Encryption-Key=GS >>>> Transaction-Thread-Count=10 >>>> Session-Thread-Count=10 >>>> Alerting-Timeout=30000 >>>> Seize-Timeout=60000 >>>> SIP-Timer-H=Default >>>> Session-Keep-Alive=1800 >>>> Session-Max-Life-Span=10800 >>>> Max-Concurrent-Session=100 >>>> [Upper-Registration] >>>> Rewrite-TO-Domain=True >>>> Rewrite-FROM-Domain=True >>>> Route-List Array Size=1 >>>> Route-List 1=[sip:*@xyz.net] sip:sip.abc.net;domain=sip.abc.net >>> >>> >>> >>>> Here is the required trace: >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 INF: [CID=0x0e84] <<< REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net >>>> SIP/2.0 SRC: 192.168.10.3:7344:UDP enc=0 bytes=603 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net >>>> SIP/2.0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] From: "123456" >>>> <sip:12...@si...>;tag=5b2f4a5c >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] To: "123456" >>>> <sip:12...@si...> >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> 192.168.10.3:7344;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf4488886f02b-1---d8754z- >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] CSeq: 1 REGISTER >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Call-ID: >>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI. >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Contact: >>>> <sip:123456@192.168.10.3:7344;rinstance=001e862ffef9c5cd> >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] User-Agent: X-Lite >>>> release 1014k stamp 47051 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Expires: 1800 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Max-Forwards: 70 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Allow: INVITE, ACK, >>>> CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Supported: timer >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Content-Length: 0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.734 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Finding transaction for >>>> REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.735 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Setting Transaction ID to >>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf4488886f02b >>>> -1---d8754z-|REGISTER >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.735 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.735 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] *** CREATING TRANSACTION >>>> (NIST) *** >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.735 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Message: REGISTER >>>> sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.735 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Call-Id: >>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI. >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.735 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.736 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NIST(1274519418) *** >>>> CREATED *** - >>>> NIST|ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf448888 >>>> 6f02b-1---d8754z-|REGISTER >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.737 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NIST(1274519418) >>>> Event(SIPMessage) - REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.738 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] TRANSACTION: (NIST) REGISTER >>>> sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 State: 0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.739 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NIST(1274519418) >>>> StateIdle->StateTrying >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.748 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Finding transaction for >>>> REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.748 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Setting Transaction ID to >>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e69fe7 >>>> 80e6bacb|REGISTER >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.749 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.749 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] *** CREATING TRANSACTION >>>> (NICT) *** >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.749 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Message: REGISTER >>>> sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.749 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Call-Id: >>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI. >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.749 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.750 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) *** >>>> CREATED *** - >>>> NICT|ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e >>>> 69fe780e6bacb|REGISTER >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.751 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) >>>> Event(SIPMessage) - REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.751 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] TRANSACTION: (NICT) REGISTER >>>> sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 State: 0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.752 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) >>>> StateIdle->StateTrying(REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0) >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.752 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Timer E( >>>> 500 ms ) STARTED >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.752 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Timer F( >>>> 10000 ms ) STARTED >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.757 INF: [CID=0x0e84] >>> REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net >>>> SIP/2.0 DST: 10.232.4.69:5060:UDP SRC: 10.70.3.200:5060 enc=0 bytes=825 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net >>>> SIP/2.0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] From: "123456" >>>> <sip:12...@si...>;tag=5b2f4a5c >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] To: "123456" >>>> <sip:12...@si...> >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> 10.70.3.200:5060;branch=z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e69fe780e6bacb;uas-addr=10. >>>> 232.4.69;x-reg-id=c2lwOjAzNDEzNTUyNTUyMUAxOTIuMTY4LjE3OC42NDo3MzQ0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> 192.168.10.3:7344;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf4488886f02b-1---d8754z-;rport=7 >>>> 344;received=192.168.10.3 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] CSeq: 1 REGISTER >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Call-ID: >>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI. >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Contact: >>>> <sip:123456@10.70.3.200:5062;x-reg-id=sip%3A192.168.10.3%3A7344;rinstance=00 >>>> 1e862ffef9c5cd> >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] User-Agent: X-Lite >>>> release 1014k stamp 47051 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Expires: 1800 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Max-Forwards: 70 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Allow: INVITE, ACK, >>>> CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Supported: timer >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Content-Length: 0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.760 PWL: [CID=0x0000] Using Iface: 10.70.3.200 to >>>> send to Dest: 10.232.4.69 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 INF: [CID=0x0e84] <<< SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>> SRC: 10.232.4.69:5060:UDP enc=0 bytes=571 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] From: "123456" >>>> <sip:12...@si...>;tag=5b2f4a5c >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] To: "123456" >>>> <sip:12...@si...>;tag=1_1146_t12083_6eo6 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> 10.70.3.200:5060;branch=z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e69fe780e6bacb;uas-addr=10. >>>> 232.4.69;x-reg-id=c2lwOjAzNDEzNTUyNTUyMUAxOTIuMTY4LjE3OC42NDo3MzQ0;received= >>>> 10.70.3.200 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> 192.168.10.3:7344;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf4488886f02b-1---d8754z-;rport=7 >>>> 344;received=192.168.10.3 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] CSeq: 1 REGISTER >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Call-ID: >>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI. >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Content-Length: 0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.773 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Finding transaction for >>>> SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.774 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Setting Transaction ID to >>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e69fe7 >>>> 80e6bacb|REGISTER >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.774 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] Found >>>> NICT|ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e >>>> 69fe780e6bacb|REGISTER >>>> for SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.776 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) >>>> Event(SIPMessage) - SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.776 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] TRANSACTION: (NICT) SIP/2.0 >>>> 403 Forbidden AOR State: 1 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.776 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) >>>> StateTrying->StateCompleted >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.776 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Timer E >>>> STOPPED >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.776 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Timer F >>>> STOPPED >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.777 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Finding transaction for >>>> SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.778 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Setting Transaction ID to >>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf4488886f02b >>>> -1---d8754z-|REGISTER >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.778 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] Found >>>> NIST|ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf448888 >>>> 6f02b-1---d8754z-|REGISTER >>>> for SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.779 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Timer K( >>>> 5000 ms ) STARTED >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.780 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NIST(1274519418) >>>> Event(SIPMessage) - SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.780 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] TRANSACTION: (NIST) SIP/2.0 >>>> 403 Forbidden AOR State: 1 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.781 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> NIST(1274519418)HandleStateTrying->StateCompleted >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 INF: [CID=0x0e84] >>> SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>> DST: 192.168.10.3:7344:UDP SRC: 10.70.3.200:5060 enc=0 bytes=389 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] From: "123456" >>>> <sip:12...@si...>;tag=5b2f4a5c >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] To: "123456" >>>> <sip:12...@si...>;tag=1_1146_t12083_6eo6 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> 192.168.10.3:7344;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf4488886f02b-1---d8754z-;rport=7 >>>> 344;received=192.168.10.3 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] CSeq: 1 REGISTER >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Call-ID: >>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI. >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Content-Length: 0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.786 PWL: [CID=0x0000] Using Iface: 10.70.3.200 to >>>> send to Dest: 192.168.10.3 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.788 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NIST(1274519418) Timer J( >>>> 32000 ms ) STARTED >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.769 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Timer K( >>>> 5000 ms ) EXPIRED >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.770 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Event( >>>> Timer-K ) Interval: 5000 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.771 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Event(Final) >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.771 DTL: [CID=0x0000] *** REMOVED TRANSACTION *** >>>> NICT|ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e >>>> 69fe780e6bacb|REGISTER >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.772 DBG: [CID=0x0000] GC: First Stale Object >>>> SIPTransaction >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.773 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] TRANSACTION: (NICT) DESTROYED >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.773 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) *** >>>> DESTROYED *** - >>>> NICT|ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e >>>> 69fe780e6bacb|REGISTER >>> >>> >>>> Many thanks in advance. >>> >>>> Andre >>> >>> >>>>>>>> Andre >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> jo...@op... schrieb: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Andre, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, the new code are in. What kind of issue are you bumping into? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Joegen >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> André Mamitzsch wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Joegen, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a couple of issues with the upper registration in my test >>>>>>>>>>>>> lab. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Before I start troubleshooting - can you confirm that the new code >>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>> committed. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Andre >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> jo...@op... schrieb: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I have recently committed code for shared line appearance (SLA) >>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>> would render upper registration to temporarily not function (Local >>>>>>>>>>>>> Reg >>>>>>>>>>>>> should be ok). This is just temporarily until I've committed the >>>>>>>>>>>>> revised code for upper reg which is anticipated to be completed by >>>>>>>>>>>>> tomorrow. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Joegen >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>>> ------ >>>>>>>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>>>>>>>>>> challenge >>>>>>>>>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win >>>>>>>>>>>>> great prizes >>>>>>>>>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in >>>>>>>>>>>>> the world >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>> ope...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------>>>>>>> > - >>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>>>>> challenge >>>>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>>>>>> prizes >>>>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >>>>>>>> world >>>>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>>>>> ope...@li... >>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>>>>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>>>>>>> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.19/1660 - Release Date: >>>>>>>> 9/8/2008 6:39 PM >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>>> ------ >>>>>>>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>>>>>>>>>> challenge >>>>>>>>>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win >>>>>>>>>>>>> great prizes >>>>>>>>>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in >>>>>>>>>>>>> the world >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>> ope...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge >>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>> prizes >>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>> ope...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>>> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.19/1663 - Release Date: >>>> 9/9/2008 7:04 PM >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>>>>>>> challenge >>>>>>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>>>>>>>> prizes >>>>>>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >>>>>>>>>> world >>>>>>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>>>>>>> ope...@li... >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>>>>>>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>>>>>>>>> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.19/1665 - Release Date: >>>>>>>>>> 9/10/2008 7:00 PM >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>>>>>> challenge >>>>>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>>>>>>> prizes >>>>>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >>>>>>>>> world >>>>>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>>>>>> ope...@li... >>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>>>>>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------->>>>>>>> > - >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>>>>>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>>>>>>>> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.19/1665 - Release Date: >>>>>>>>> 9/10/2008 7:00 PM >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------>>>>>>> > - >>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>>>>> challenge >>>>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>>>>>> prizes >>>>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >>>>>>>> world >>>>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>>>>> ope...@li... >>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge >>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>> prizes >>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.21/1667 - Release Date: >>> 9/11/2008 6:55 PM >>> >>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>> challenge >>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>>> prizes >>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>> ope...@li... >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>>>> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.21/1667 - Release Date: 9/11/2008 >>>>> 6:55 PM >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge >>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>> prizes >>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>> ope...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge >> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >> prizes >> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) >> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org >> >> iD8DBQFIyp7CQKZIuVrbkWoRAhmMAJ9RTlOvn3MQpxkmVOVbFOEKCeduUwCeKlPL >> Kr/DcxtdVMoAxImk4PXsWKg= >> =4Pfw >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel |
|
From: Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...> - 2008-09-29 11:19:18
|
Hi Andre, I commited a big patch for upper-reg. Can you test the latest if you still encounter your problem? Let me know if it persists. Joegen Andre Mamitzsch wrote: > Hello Joegen, > > I just compiled the latest opensbc version from CVS. It seems that the > previously fixed issue with the upper registration reappeared in this > version. The upper registration is executed, but the domain rewriting is not > performed. Would you be so kind and have a look at this ? > > Regards, > > Andre > > > > > Am 12.09.08 18:54 schrieb "André Mamitzsch" unter <an...@ma...>: > > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hi Joegen, >> >> I can confirm that upper-reg is working now, many thanks again. >> >> >> Andre >> >> >> André Mamitzsch schrieb: >> >>> Hi Joegen, >>> >>> that sounds great, many thanks ! I will test it right now and let you know. >>> >>> Andre >>> >>> jo...@op... schrieb: >>> >>>> Andre, >>>> >>>> This should now be fixed in CVS. Can you try and let me know? >>>> >>>> Joegen >>>> >>>> jo...@op... wrote: >>>> >>>>> Andre, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for the info. I will try to replicate this. I'll get back to >>>>> you when a patch is ready. >>>>> >>>>> Joegen >>>>> >>>>> Andre Mamitzsch wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Joegen E. Baclor schrieb: >>>> >>> >>>>>>>> Andre, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This time in response to your thread. My questions inline... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Joegen E. Baclor wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [snipped] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Joegen, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> thanks for the quick reply and the confirmation. It seems to me that the >>>>>>>> rewriting is not working anymore. >>>>>>>> If I try to register my devices, the FROM: and TO: fields are not being >>>>>>>> touched and stay the same. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As far as I can remember, Upper-Reg never touches the from and to >>>>>>>>> headers except for an undocumented "domain" parameter in the route >>>>>>>>> entry. Is this what you are referring to by any chance? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> Yes,I think so. In the UpperReg section, I have checked the boxes to >>>> rewrite the from and to domain. I also added the "domain=xyz.de" parameter. >>>> >>>> Here is the entry from the UpperReg section: >>>> >>>> [sip:*@xyz.net] sip:sip.abc.net;domain=sip.abc.net >>>> >>> >>>>>>>> The softswitch therfore replies with an >>>>>>>> "SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> By softswitch do you mean your registrar? Can you double check if it >>>>>>>>> isn't OpenSBC that generated this 403 locally? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> the forbidden AOR is generated by the registrar. That's because the >>>> OpenSBC does not rewrite the from and to domain name. >>>> >>> >>>>>>>> If I find some time during the day, I will dig into it, do a little bit >>>>>>>> more debugging and let you know what I have found. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Explaining your setup using a ladder diagram plus level 5 log MAY tell >>>>>>>>> us more what went wrong. Would you be able to send it? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> ____________ ____________ ___________ >>>> | | sip.xyz.net | | sip.abc.net | | >>>> | SIP Client |--------------|OpenSBC |-------------| Registrar | >>>> |____________| |____________| |___________| >>>> 192.168.10.3 10.70.3.200 10.232.4.85 >>>> 10.232.4.69 >>>> >>> >>>> The name "sip.xyz.net" is resolved to the IP 10.70.3.200 >>>> The name "sip.abc.net" is resolved to the IP 10.232.4.69 or 10.232.4.85 >>>> >>>> The client tries to register with the following parameters: >>>> >>>> SIP Username: 123456 >>>> SIP Domain: sip.xyz.net >>>> >>>> Authentication Username: something >>>> Authentication Password: something else >>>> >>> >>>> The registrar has the following setup for that user: >>>> >>>> SIP Username: 123456 >>>> SIP Domain: sip.abc.net >>>> >>>> Authentication Username: something >>>> Authentication Password: something else >>>> >>> >>>> Here is what we want to do: >>>> >>>> The real domain of our Registrar should be hidden as best as possible. >>>> The reason is that we have a couple of resellers which offer the service >>>> to their customers and therefore want to have their own branding for the >>>> service. >>>> >>> >>>> In previous versions of the OpenSBC, this setup worked well. The client >>>> sent the register, the OpenSBC replaced the domain "sip.xyz.net" with >>>> "sip.abc.net", the authentication took place and we were able to make >>>> phonecalls. >>>> >>>> I would appreciate an advise where to look first in order to find the >>>> problem. >>>> >>>> Here is the sbc.ini >>>> >>>> [OpenSBC-General-Parameters] >>>> SIP-Log-Level=5 >>>> PTRACE-Log-Level=5 >>>> Log-File-Prefix=b2bua >>>> SBC-Application-Mode=B2BUpperReg Mode >>>> Interface-Address Array Size=0 >>>> Enable-Backdoor-Port=True >>>> Enable-Trunk-Port=True >>>> Enable-Calea-Port=True >>>> RTP-Min-Port=30000 >>>> RTP-Max-Port=35000 >>>> Enable-Local-Refer=False >>>> Max-Forwards=70 >>>> Encryption-Mode=XOR >>>> Encryption-Key=GS >>>> Transaction-Thread-Count=10 >>>> Session-Thread-Count=10 >>>> Alerting-Timeout=30000 >>>> Seize-Timeout=60000 >>>> SIP-Timer-H=Default >>>> Session-Keep-Alive=1800 >>>> Session-Max-Life-Span=10800 >>>> Max-Concurrent-Session=100 >>>> >>>> [Upper-Registration] >>>> Rewrite-TO-Domain=True >>>> Rewrite-FROM-Domain=True >>>> Route-List Array Size=1 >>>> Route-List 1=[sip:*@xyz.net] sip:sip.abc.net;domain=sip.abc.net >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Here is the required trace: >>>> >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 INF: [CID=0x0e84] <<< REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net >>>> SIP/2.0 SRC: 192.168.10.3:7344:UDP enc=0 bytes=603 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net >>>> SIP/2.0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] From: "123456" >>>> <sip:12...@si...>;tag=5b2f4a5c >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] To: "123456" >>>> <sip:12...@si...> >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> 192.168.10.3:7344;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf4488886f02b-1---d8754z- >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] CSeq: 1 REGISTER >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Call-ID: >>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI. >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Contact: >>>> <sip:123456@192.168.10.3:7344;rinstance=001e862ffef9c5cd> >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] User-Agent: X-Lite >>>> release 1014k stamp 47051 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Expires: 1800 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Max-Forwards: 70 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Allow: INVITE, ACK, >>>> CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Supported: timer >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Content-Length: 0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.734 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Finding transaction for >>>> REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.735 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Setting Transaction ID to >>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf4488886f02b >>>> -1---d8754z-|REGISTER >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.735 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.735 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] *** CREATING TRANSACTION >>>> (NIST) *** >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.735 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Message: REGISTER >>>> sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.735 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Call-Id: >>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI. >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.735 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.736 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NIST(1274519418) *** >>>> CREATED *** - >>>> NIST|ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf448888 >>>> 6f02b-1---d8754z-|REGISTER >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.737 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NIST(1274519418) >>>> Event(SIPMessage) - REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.738 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] TRANSACTION: (NIST) REGISTER >>>> sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 State: 0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.739 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NIST(1274519418) >>>> StateIdle->StateTrying >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.748 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Finding transaction for >>>> REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.748 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Setting Transaction ID to >>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e69fe7 >>>> 80e6bacb|REGISTER >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.749 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.749 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] *** CREATING TRANSACTION >>>> (NICT) *** >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.749 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Message: REGISTER >>>> sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.749 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Call-Id: >>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI. >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.749 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.750 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) *** >>>> CREATED *** - >>>> NICT|ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e >>>> 69fe780e6bacb|REGISTER >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.751 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) >>>> Event(SIPMessage) - REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.751 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] TRANSACTION: (NICT) REGISTER >>>> sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 State: 0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.752 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) >>>> StateIdle->StateTrying(REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0) >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.752 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Timer E( >>>> 500 ms ) STARTED >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.752 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Timer F( >>>> 10000 ms ) STARTED >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.757 INF: [CID=0x0e84] >>> REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net >>>> SIP/2.0 DST: 10.232.4.69:5060:UDP SRC: 10.70.3.200:5060 enc=0 bytes=825 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net >>>> SIP/2.0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] From: "123456" >>>> <sip:12...@si...>;tag=5b2f4a5c >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] To: "123456" >>>> <sip:12...@si...> >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> 10.70.3.200:5060;branch=z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e69fe780e6bacb;uas-addr=10. >>>> 232.4.69;x-reg-id=c2lwOjAzNDEzNTUyNTUyMUAxOTIuMTY4LjE3OC42NDo3MzQ0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> 192.168.10.3:7344;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf4488886f02b-1---d8754z-;rport=7 >>>> 344;received=192.168.10.3 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] CSeq: 1 REGISTER >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Call-ID: >>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI. >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Contact: >>>> <sip:123456@10.70.3.200:5062;x-reg-id=sip%3A192.168.10.3%3A7344;rinstance=00 >>>> 1e862ffef9c5cd> >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] User-Agent: X-Lite >>>> release 1014k stamp 47051 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Expires: 1800 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Max-Forwards: 70 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Allow: INVITE, ACK, >>>> CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Supported: timer >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Content-Length: 0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.760 PWL: [CID=0x0000] Using Iface: 10.70.3.200 to >>>> send to Dest: 10.232.4.69 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 INF: [CID=0x0e84] <<< SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>> SRC: 10.232.4.69:5060:UDP enc=0 bytes=571 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] From: "123456" >>>> <sip:12...@si...>;tag=5b2f4a5c >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] To: "123456" >>>> <sip:12...@si...>;tag=1_1146_t12083_6eo6 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> 10.70.3.200:5060;branch=z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e69fe780e6bacb;uas-addr=10. >>>> 232.4.69;x-reg-id=c2lwOjAzNDEzNTUyNTUyMUAxOTIuMTY4LjE3OC42NDo3MzQ0;received= >>>> 10.70.3.200 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> 192.168.10.3:7344;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf4488886f02b-1---d8754z-;rport=7 >>>> 344;received=192.168.10.3 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] CSeq: 1 REGISTER >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Call-ID: >>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI. >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Content-Length: 0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.773 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Finding transaction for >>>> SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.774 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Setting Transaction ID to >>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e69fe7 >>>> 80e6bacb|REGISTER >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.774 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] Found >>>> NICT|ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e >>>> 69fe780e6bacb|REGISTER >>>> for SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.776 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) >>>> Event(SIPMessage) - SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.776 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] TRANSACTION: (NICT) SIP/2.0 >>>> 403 Forbidden AOR State: 1 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.776 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) >>>> StateTrying->StateCompleted >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.776 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Timer E >>>> STOPPED >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.776 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Timer F >>>> STOPPED >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.777 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Finding transaction for >>>> SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.778 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Setting Transaction ID to >>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf4488886f02b >>>> -1---d8754z-|REGISTER >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.778 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] Found >>>> NIST|ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf448888 >>>> 6f02b-1---d8754z-|REGISTER >>>> for SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.779 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Timer K( >>>> 5000 ms ) STARTED >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.780 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NIST(1274519418) >>>> Event(SIPMessage) - SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.780 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] TRANSACTION: (NIST) SIP/2.0 >>>> 403 Forbidden AOR State: 1 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.781 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> NIST(1274519418)HandleStateTrying->StateCompleted >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 INF: [CID=0x0e84] >>> SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>> DST: 192.168.10.3:7344:UDP SRC: 10.70.3.200:5060 enc=0 bytes=389 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] From: "123456" >>>> <sip:12...@si...>;tag=5b2f4a5c >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] To: "123456" >>>> <sip:12...@si...>;tag=1_1146_t12083_6eo6 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> 192.168.10.3:7344;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf4488886f02b-1---d8754z-;rport=7 >>>> 344;received=192.168.10.3 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] CSeq: 1 REGISTER >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Call-ID: >>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI. >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Content-Length: 0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.786 PWL: [CID=0x0000] Using Iface: 10.70.3.200 to >>>> send to Dest: 192.168.10.3 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.788 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NIST(1274519418) Timer J( >>>> 32000 ms ) STARTED >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.769 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Timer K( >>>> 5000 ms ) EXPIRED >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.770 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Event( >>>> Timer-K ) Interval: 5000 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.771 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Event(Final) >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.771 DTL: [CID=0x0000] *** REMOVED TRANSACTION *** >>>> NICT|ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e >>>> 69fe780e6bacb|REGISTER >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.772 DBG: [CID=0x0000] GC: First Stale Object >>>> SIPTransaction >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.773 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] TRANSACTION: (NICT) DESTROYED >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.773 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) *** >>>> DESTROYED *** - >>>> NICT|ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e >>>> 69fe780e6bacb|REGISTER >>>> >>> >>> >>>> Many thanks in advance. >>>> >>> >>>> Andre >>>> >>> >>> >>>>>>>> Andre >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> jo...@op... schrieb: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Andre, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, the new code are in. What kind of issue are you bumping into? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Joegen >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> André Mamitzsch wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Joegen, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a couple of issues with the upper registration in my test >>>>>>>>>>>>> lab. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Before I start troubleshooting - can you confirm that the new code >>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>> committed. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Andre >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> jo...@op... schrieb: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I have recently committed code for shared line appearance (SLA) >>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>> would render upper registration to temporarily not function (Local >>>>>>>>>>>>> Reg >>>>>>>>>>>>> should be ok). This is just temporarily until I've committed the >>>>>>>>>>>>> revised code for upper reg which is anticipated to be completed by >>>>>>>>>>>>> tomorrow. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Joegen >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>>> ------ >>>>>>>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>>>>>>>>>> challenge >>>>>>>>>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win >>>>>>>>>>>>> great prizes >>>>>>>>>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in >>>>>>>>>>>>> the world >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>> ope...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------>>>>>>> > - > >>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>>>>> challenge >>>>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>>>>>> prizes >>>>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >>>>>>>> world >>>>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>>>>> ope...@li... >>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>>>>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>>>>>>> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.19/1660 - Release Date: >>>>>>>> 9/8/2008 6:39 PM >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>>> ------ >>>>>>>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>>>>>>>>>> challenge >>>>>>>>>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win >>>>>>>>>>>>> great prizes >>>>>>>>>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in >>>>>>>>>>>>> the world >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>> ope...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge >>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>> prizes >>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>> ope...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>>> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.19/1663 - Release Date: >>>> 9/9/2008 7:04 PM >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>>>>>>> challenge >>>>>>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>>>>>>>> prizes >>>>>>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >>>>>>>>>> world >>>>>>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>>>>>>> ope...@li... >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>>>>>>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>>>>>>>>> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.19/1665 - Release Date: >>>>>>>>>> 9/10/2008 7:00 PM >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>>>>>> challenge >>>>>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>>>>>>> prizes >>>>>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >>>>>>>>> world >>>>>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>>>>>> ope...@li... >>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------->>>>>>>> > - > >>>>>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>>>>>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>>>>>>>> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.19/1665 - Release Date: >>>>>>>>> 9/10/2008 7:00 PM >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------>>>>>>> > - > >>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>>>>> challenge >>>>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>>>>>> prizes >>>>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >>>>>>>> world >>>>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>>>>> ope...@li... >>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge >>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>> prizes >>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.21/1667 - Release Date: >>> 9/11/2008 6:55 PM >>> >>> >>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>> challenge >>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>>> prizes >>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>> ope...@li... >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>>>> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.21/1667 - Release Date: 9/11/2008 >>>>> 6:55 PM >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge >>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>> prizes >>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>> ope...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>> >> - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge >> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >> prizes >> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) >> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org >> >> iD8DBQFIyp7CQKZIuVrbkWoRAhmMAJ9RTlOvn3MQpxkmVOVbFOEKCeduUwCeKlPL >> Kr/DcxtdVMoAxImk4PXsWKg= >> =4Pfw >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.7.4/1695 - Release Date: 9/27/2008 1:11 PM > > |
|
From: <jo...@op...> - 2008-09-29 10:24:33
|
Hi Andre, I commited a big patch for upper-reg. Can you test the latest if you still encounter your problem? Let me know if it persists. Joegen Andre Mamitzsch wrote: > Hello Joegen, > > I just compiled the latest opensbc version from CVS. It seems that the > previously fixed issue with the upper registration reappeared in this > version. The upper registration is executed, but the domain rewriting is not > performed. Would you be so kind and have a look at this ? > > Regards, > > Andre > > > > > Am 12.09.08 18:54 schrieb "André Mamitzsch" unter <an...@ma...>: > > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hi Joegen, >> >> I can confirm that upper-reg is working now, many thanks again. >> >> >> Andre >> >> >> André Mamitzsch schrieb: >> >>> Hi Joegen, >>> >>> that sounds great, many thanks ! I will test it right now and let you know. >>> >>> Andre >>> >>> jo...@op... schrieb: >>> >>>> Andre, >>>> >>>> This should now be fixed in CVS. Can you try and let me know? >>>> >>>> Joegen >>>> >>>> jo...@op... wrote: >>>> >>>>> Andre, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for the info. I will try to replicate this. I'll get back to >>>>> you when a patch is ready. >>>>> >>>>> Joegen >>>>> >>>>> Andre Mamitzsch wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Joegen E. Baclor schrieb: >>>> >>> >>>>>>>> Andre, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This time in response to your thread. My questions inline... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Joegen E. Baclor wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [snipped] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Joegen, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> thanks for the quick reply and the confirmation. It seems to me that the >>>>>>>> rewriting is not working anymore. >>>>>>>> If I try to register my devices, the FROM: and TO: fields are not being >>>>>>>> touched and stay the same. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As far as I can remember, Upper-Reg never touches the from and to >>>>>>>>> headers except for an undocumented "domain" parameter in the route >>>>>>>>> entry. Is this what you are referring to by any chance? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> Yes,I think so. In the UpperReg section, I have checked the boxes to >>>> rewrite the from and to domain. I also added the "domain=xyz.de" parameter. >>>> >>>> Here is the entry from the UpperReg section: >>>> >>>> [sip:*@xyz.net] sip:sip.abc.net;domain=sip.abc.net >>>> >>> >>>>>>>> The softswitch therfore replies with an >>>>>>>> "SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> By softswitch do you mean your registrar? Can you double check if it >>>>>>>>> isn't OpenSBC that generated this 403 locally? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> the forbidden AOR is generated by the registrar. That's because the >>>> OpenSBC does not rewrite the from and to domain name. >>>> >>> >>>>>>>> If I find some time during the day, I will dig into it, do a little bit >>>>>>>> more debugging and let you know what I have found. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Explaining your setup using a ladder diagram plus level 5 log MAY tell >>>>>>>>> us more what went wrong. Would you be able to send it? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> ____________ ____________ ___________ >>>> | | sip.xyz.net | | sip.abc.net | | >>>> | SIP Client |--------------|OpenSBC |-------------| Registrar | >>>> |____________| |____________| |___________| >>>> 192.168.10.3 10.70.3.200 10.232.4.85 >>>> 10.232.4.69 >>>> >>> >>>> The name "sip.xyz.net" is resolved to the IP 10.70.3.200 >>>> The name "sip.abc.net" is resolved to the IP 10.232.4.69 or 10.232.4.85 >>>> >>>> The client tries to register with the following parameters: >>>> >>>> SIP Username: 123456 >>>> SIP Domain: sip.xyz.net >>>> >>>> Authentication Username: something >>>> Authentication Password: something else >>>> >>> >>>> The registrar has the following setup for that user: >>>> >>>> SIP Username: 123456 >>>> SIP Domain: sip.abc.net >>>> >>>> Authentication Username: something >>>> Authentication Password: something else >>>> >>> >>>> Here is what we want to do: >>>> >>>> The real domain of our Registrar should be hidden as best as possible. >>>> The reason is that we have a couple of resellers which offer the service >>>> to their customers and therefore want to have their own branding for the >>>> service. >>>> >>> >>>> In previous versions of the OpenSBC, this setup worked well. The client >>>> sent the register, the OpenSBC replaced the domain "sip.xyz.net" with >>>> "sip.abc.net", the authentication took place and we were able to make >>>> phonecalls. >>>> >>>> I would appreciate an advise where to look first in order to find the >>>> problem. >>>> >>>> Here is the sbc.ini >>>> >>>> [OpenSBC-General-Parameters] >>>> SIP-Log-Level=5 >>>> PTRACE-Log-Level=5 >>>> Log-File-Prefix=b2bua >>>> SBC-Application-Mode=B2BUpperReg Mode >>>> Interface-Address Array Size=0 >>>> Enable-Backdoor-Port=True >>>> Enable-Trunk-Port=True >>>> Enable-Calea-Port=True >>>> RTP-Min-Port=30000 >>>> RTP-Max-Port=35000 >>>> Enable-Local-Refer=False >>>> Max-Forwards=70 >>>> Encryption-Mode=XOR >>>> Encryption-Key=GS >>>> Transaction-Thread-Count=10 >>>> Session-Thread-Count=10 >>>> Alerting-Timeout=30000 >>>> Seize-Timeout=60000 >>>> SIP-Timer-H=Default >>>> Session-Keep-Alive=1800 >>>> Session-Max-Life-Span=10800 >>>> Max-Concurrent-Session=100 >>>> >>>> [Upper-Registration] >>>> Rewrite-TO-Domain=True >>>> Rewrite-FROM-Domain=True >>>> Route-List Array Size=1 >>>> Route-List 1=[sip:*@xyz.net] sip:sip.abc.net;domain=sip.abc.net >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Here is the required trace: >>>> >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 INF: [CID=0x0e84] <<< REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net >>>> SIP/2.0 SRC: 192.168.10.3:7344:UDP enc=0 bytes=603 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net >>>> SIP/2.0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] From: "123456" >>>> <sip:12...@si...>;tag=5b2f4a5c >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] To: "123456" >>>> <sip:12...@si...> >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> 192.168.10.3:7344;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf4488886f02b-1---d8754z- >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] CSeq: 1 REGISTER >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Call-ID: >>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI. >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Contact: >>>> <sip:123456@192.168.10.3:7344;rinstance=001e862ffef9c5cd> >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] User-Agent: X-Lite >>>> release 1014k stamp 47051 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Expires: 1800 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Max-Forwards: 70 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Allow: INVITE, ACK, >>>> CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Supported: timer >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Content-Length: 0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.734 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Finding transaction for >>>> REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.735 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Setting Transaction ID to >>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf4488886f02b >>>> -1---d8754z-|REGISTER >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.735 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.735 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] *** CREATING TRANSACTION >>>> (NIST) *** >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.735 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Message: REGISTER >>>> sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.735 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Call-Id: >>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI. >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.735 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.736 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NIST(1274519418) *** >>>> CREATED *** - >>>> NIST|ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf448888 >>>> 6f02b-1---d8754z-|REGISTER >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.737 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NIST(1274519418) >>>> Event(SIPMessage) - REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.738 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] TRANSACTION: (NIST) REGISTER >>>> sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 State: 0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.739 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NIST(1274519418) >>>> StateIdle->StateTrying >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.748 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Finding transaction for >>>> REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.748 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Setting Transaction ID to >>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e69fe7 >>>> 80e6bacb|REGISTER >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.749 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.749 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] *** CREATING TRANSACTION >>>> (NICT) *** >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.749 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Message: REGISTER >>>> sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.749 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Call-Id: >>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI. >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.749 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.750 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) *** >>>> CREATED *** - >>>> NICT|ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e >>>> 69fe780e6bacb|REGISTER >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.751 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) >>>> Event(SIPMessage) - REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.751 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] TRANSACTION: (NICT) REGISTER >>>> sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 State: 0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.752 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) >>>> StateIdle->StateTrying(REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0) >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.752 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Timer E( >>>> 500 ms ) STARTED >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.752 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Timer F( >>>> 10000 ms ) STARTED >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.757 INF: [CID=0x0e84] >>> REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net >>>> SIP/2.0 DST: 10.232.4.69:5060:UDP SRC: 10.70.3.200:5060 enc=0 bytes=825 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net >>>> SIP/2.0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] From: "123456" >>>> <sip:12...@si...>;tag=5b2f4a5c >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] To: "123456" >>>> <sip:12...@si...> >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> 10.70.3.200:5060;branch=z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e69fe780e6bacb;uas-addr=10. >>>> 232.4.69;x-reg-id=c2lwOjAzNDEzNTUyNTUyMUAxOTIuMTY4LjE3OC42NDo3MzQ0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> 192.168.10.3:7344;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf4488886f02b-1---d8754z-;rport=7 >>>> 344;received=192.168.10.3 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] CSeq: 1 REGISTER >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Call-ID: >>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI. >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Contact: >>>> <sip:123456@10.70.3.200:5062;x-reg-id=sip%3A192.168.10.3%3A7344;rinstance=00 >>>> 1e862ffef9c5cd> >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] User-Agent: X-Lite >>>> release 1014k stamp 47051 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Expires: 1800 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Max-Forwards: 70 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Allow: INVITE, ACK, >>>> CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Supported: timer >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Content-Length: 0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.760 PWL: [CID=0x0000] Using Iface: 10.70.3.200 to >>>> send to Dest: 10.232.4.69 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 INF: [CID=0x0e84] <<< SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>> SRC: 10.232.4.69:5060:UDP enc=0 bytes=571 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] From: "123456" >>>> <sip:12...@si...>;tag=5b2f4a5c >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] To: "123456" >>>> <sip:12...@si...>;tag=1_1146_t12083_6eo6 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> 10.70.3.200:5060;branch=z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e69fe780e6bacb;uas-addr=10. >>>> 232.4.69;x-reg-id=c2lwOjAzNDEzNTUyNTUyMUAxOTIuMTY4LjE3OC42NDo3MzQ0;received= >>>> 10.70.3.200 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> 192.168.10.3:7344;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf4488886f02b-1---d8754z-;rport=7 >>>> 344;received=192.168.10.3 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] CSeq: 1 REGISTER >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Call-ID: >>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI. >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Content-Length: 0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.773 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Finding transaction for >>>> SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.774 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Setting Transaction ID to >>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e69fe7 >>>> 80e6bacb|REGISTER >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.774 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] Found >>>> NICT|ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e >>>> 69fe780e6bacb|REGISTER >>>> for SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.776 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) >>>> Event(SIPMessage) - SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.776 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] TRANSACTION: (NICT) SIP/2.0 >>>> 403 Forbidden AOR State: 1 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.776 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) >>>> StateTrying->StateCompleted >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.776 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Timer E >>>> STOPPED >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.776 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Timer F >>>> STOPPED >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.777 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Finding transaction for >>>> SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.778 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Setting Transaction ID to >>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf4488886f02b >>>> -1---d8754z-|REGISTER >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.778 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] Found >>>> NIST|ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf448888 >>>> 6f02b-1---d8754z-|REGISTER >>>> for SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.779 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Timer K( >>>> 5000 ms ) STARTED >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.780 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NIST(1274519418) >>>> Event(SIPMessage) - SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.780 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] TRANSACTION: (NIST) SIP/2.0 >>>> 403 Forbidden AOR State: 1 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.781 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> NIST(1274519418)HandleStateTrying->StateCompleted >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 INF: [CID=0x0e84] >>> SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>> DST: 192.168.10.3:7344:UDP SRC: 10.70.3.200:5060 enc=0 bytes=389 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] From: "123456" >>>> <sip:12...@si...>;tag=5b2f4a5c >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] To: "123456" >>>> <sip:12...@si...>;tag=1_1146_t12083_6eo6 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> 192.168.10.3:7344;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf4488886f02b-1---d8754z-;rport=7 >>>> 344;received=192.168.10.3 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] CSeq: 1 REGISTER >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Call-ID: >>>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI. >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Content-Length: 0 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.786 PWL: [CID=0x0000] Using Iface: 10.70.3.200 to >>>> send to Dest: 192.168.10.3 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.788 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NIST(1274519418) Timer J( >>>> 32000 ms ) STARTED >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.769 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Timer K( >>>> 5000 ms ) EXPIRED >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.770 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Event( >>>> Timer-K ) Interval: 5000 >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.771 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Event(Final) >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.771 DTL: [CID=0x0000] *** REMOVED TRANSACTION *** >>>> NICT|ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e >>>> 69fe780e6bacb|REGISTER >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.772 DBG: [CID=0x0000] GC: First Stale Object >>>> SIPTransaction >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.773 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] TRANSACTION: (NICT) DESTROYED >>>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.773 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) *** >>>> DESTROYED *** - >>>> NICT|ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e >>>> 69fe780e6bacb|REGISTER >>>> >>> >>> >>>> Many thanks in advance. >>>> >>> >>>> Andre >>>> >>> >>> >>>>>>>> Andre >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> jo...@op... schrieb: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Andre, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, the new code are in. What kind of issue are you bumping into? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Joegen >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> André Mamitzsch wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Joegen, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a couple of issues with the upper registration in my test >>>>>>>>>>>>> lab. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Before I start troubleshooting - can you confirm that the new code >>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>> committed. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Andre >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> jo...@op... schrieb: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I have recently committed code for shared line appearance (SLA) >>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>> would render upper registration to temporarily not function (Local >>>>>>>>>>>>> Reg >>>>>>>>>>>>> should be ok). This is just temporarily until I've committed the >>>>>>>>>>>>> revised code for upper reg which is anticipated to be completed by >>>>>>>>>>>>> tomorrow. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Joegen >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>>> ------ >>>>>>>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>>>>>>>>>> challenge >>>>>>>>>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win >>>>>>>>>>>>> great prizes >>>>>>>>>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in >>>>>>>>>>>>> the world >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>> ope...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------>>>>>>> > - > >>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>>>>> challenge >>>>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>>>>>> prizes >>>>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >>>>>>>> world >>>>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>>>>> ope...@li... >>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>>>>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>>>>>>> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.19/1660 - Release Date: >>>>>>>> 9/8/2008 6:39 PM >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>>> ------ >>>>>>>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>>>>>>>>>> challenge >>>>>>>>>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win >>>>>>>>>>>>> great prizes >>>>>>>>>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in >>>>>>>>>>>>> the world >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>> ope...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge >>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>> prizes >>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>> ope...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>>> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.19/1663 - Release Date: >>>> 9/9/2008 7:04 PM >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>>>>>>> challenge >>>>>>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>>>>>>>> prizes >>>>>>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >>>>>>>>>> world >>>>>>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>>>>>>> ope...@li... >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>>>>>>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>>>>>>>>> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.19/1665 - Release Date: >>>>>>>>>> 9/10/2008 7:00 PM >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>>>>>> challenge >>>>>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>>>>>>> prizes >>>>>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >>>>>>>>> world >>>>>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>>>>>> ope...@li... >>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------->>>>>>>> > - > >>>>>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>>>>>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>>>>>>>> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.19/1665 - Release Date: >>>>>>>>> 9/10/2008 7:00 PM >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------>>>>>>> > - > >>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>>>>> challenge >>>>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>>>>>> prizes >>>>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >>>>>>>> world >>>>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>>>>> ope...@li... >>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge >>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>> prizes >>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.21/1667 - Release Date: >>> 9/11/2008 6:55 PM >>> >>> >>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>> challenge >>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>>> prizes >>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>> ope...@li... >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>>>> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.21/1667 - Release Date: 9/11/2008 >>>>> 6:55 PM >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge >>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>> prizes >>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>> ope...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>> >> - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge >> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >> prizes >> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) >> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org >> >> iD8DBQFIyp7CQKZIuVrbkWoRAhmMAJ9RTlOvn3MQpxkmVOVbFOEKCeduUwCeKlPL >> Kr/DcxtdVMoAxImk4PXsWKg= >> =4Pfw >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.7.4/1695 - Release Date: 9/27/2008 1:11 PM > > |
|
From: Andre M. <an...@ma...> - 2008-09-28 20:12:43
|
Hello Joegen, I just compiled the latest opensbc version from CVS. It seems that the previously fixed issue with the upper registration reappeared in this version. The upper registration is executed, but the domain rewriting is not performed. Would you be so kind and have a look at this ? Regards, Andre Am 12.09.08 18:54 schrieb "André Mamitzsch" unter <an...@ma...>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Joegen, > > I can confirm that upper-reg is working now, many thanks again. > > > Andre > > > André Mamitzsch schrieb: >> Hi Joegen, >> >> that sounds great, many thanks ! I will test it right now and let you know. >> >> Andre >> >> jo...@op... schrieb: >>> Andre, >> >>> This should now be fixed in CVS. Can you try and let me know? >> >>> Joegen >> >>> jo...@op... wrote: >>>> Andre, >>>> >>>> Thanks for the info. I will try to replicate this. I'll get back to >>>> you when a patch is ready. >>>> >>>> Joegen >>>> >>>> Andre Mamitzsch wrote: >>>> >> >>> Joegen E. Baclor schrieb: >> >> >>>>>>> Andre, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This time in response to your thread. My questions inline... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Joegen E. Baclor wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [snipped] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Joegen, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> thanks for the quick reply and the confirmation. It seems to me that the >>>>>>> rewriting is not working anymore. >>>>>>> If I try to register my devices, the FROM: and TO: fields are not being >>>>>>> touched and stay the same. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As far as I can remember, Upper-Reg never touches the from and to >>>>>>>> headers except for an undocumented "domain" parameter in the route >>>>>>>> entry. Is this what you are referring to by any chance? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>> Yes,I think so. In the UpperReg section, I have checked the boxes to >>> rewrite the from and to domain. I also added the "domain=xyz.de" parameter. >> >>> Here is the entry from the UpperReg section: >> >>> [sip:*@xyz.net] sip:sip.abc.net;domain=sip.abc.net >> >> >>>>>>> The softswitch therfore replies with an >>>>>>> "SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> By softswitch do you mean your registrar? Can you double check if it >>>>>>>> isn't OpenSBC that generated this 403 locally? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>> the forbidden AOR is generated by the registrar. That's because the >>> OpenSBC does not rewrite the from and to domain name. >> >> >>>>>>> If I find some time during the day, I will dig into it, do a little bit >>>>>>> more debugging and let you know what I have found. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Explaining your setup using a ladder diagram plus level 5 log MAY tell >>>>>>>> us more what went wrong. Would you be able to send it? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>> ____________ ____________ ___________ >>> | | sip.xyz.net | | sip.abc.net | | >>> | SIP Client |--------------|OpenSBC |-------------| Registrar | >>> |____________| |____________| |___________| >>> 192.168.10.3 10.70.3.200 10.232.4.85 >>> 10.232.4.69 >> >> >>> The name "sip.xyz.net" is resolved to the IP 10.70.3.200 >>> The name "sip.abc.net" is resolved to the IP 10.232.4.69 or 10.232.4.85 >> >>> The client tries to register with the following parameters: >> >>> SIP Username: 123456 >>> SIP Domain: sip.xyz.net >> >>> Authentication Username: something >>> Authentication Password: something else >> >> >>> The registrar has the following setup for that user: >> >>> SIP Username: 123456 >>> SIP Domain: sip.abc.net >> >>> Authentication Username: something >>> Authentication Password: something else >> >> >>> Here is what we want to do: >> >>> The real domain of our Registrar should be hidden as best as possible. >>> The reason is that we have a couple of resellers which offer the service >>> to their customers and therefore want to have their own branding for the >>> service. >> >> >>> In previous versions of the OpenSBC, this setup worked well. The client >>> sent the register, the OpenSBC replaced the domain "sip.xyz.net" with >>> "sip.abc.net", the authentication took place and we were able to make >>> phonecalls. >> >>> I would appreciate an advise where to look first in order to find the >>> problem. >> >>> Here is the sbc.ini >> >>> [OpenSBC-General-Parameters] >>> SIP-Log-Level=5 >>> PTRACE-Log-Level=5 >>> Log-File-Prefix=b2bua >>> SBC-Application-Mode=B2BUpperReg Mode >>> Interface-Address Array Size=0 >>> Enable-Backdoor-Port=True >>> Enable-Trunk-Port=True >>> Enable-Calea-Port=True >>> RTP-Min-Port=30000 >>> RTP-Max-Port=35000 >>> Enable-Local-Refer=False >>> Max-Forwards=70 >>> Encryption-Mode=XOR >>> Encryption-Key=GS >>> Transaction-Thread-Count=10 >>> Session-Thread-Count=10 >>> Alerting-Timeout=30000 >>> Seize-Timeout=60000 >>> SIP-Timer-H=Default >>> Session-Keep-Alive=1800 >>> Session-Max-Life-Span=10800 >>> Max-Concurrent-Session=100 >> >>> [Upper-Registration] >>> Rewrite-TO-Domain=True >>> Rewrite-FROM-Domain=True >>> Route-List Array Size=1 >>> Route-List 1=[sip:*@xyz.net] sip:sip.abc.net;domain=sip.abc.net >> >> >> >> >>> Here is the required trace: >> >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 INF: [CID=0x0e84] <<< REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net >>> SIP/2.0 SRC: 192.168.10.3:7344:UDP enc=0 bytes=603 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net >>> SIP/2.0 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] From: "123456" >>> <sip:12...@si...>;tag=5b2f4a5c >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] To: "123456" >>> <sip:12...@si...> >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>> 192.168.10.3:7344;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf4488886f02b-1---d8754z- >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] CSeq: 1 REGISTER >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Call-ID: >>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI. >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Contact: >>> <sip:123456@192.168.10.3:7344;rinstance=001e862ffef9c5cd> >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] User-Agent: X-Lite >>> release 1014k stamp 47051 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Expires: 1800 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Max-Forwards: 70 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Allow: INVITE, ACK, >>> CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Supported: timer >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Content-Length: 0 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.727 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.734 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Finding transaction for >>> REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.735 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Setting Transaction ID to >>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf4488886f02b >>> -1---d8754z-|REGISTER >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.735 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.735 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] *** CREATING TRANSACTION >>> (NIST) *** >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.735 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Message: REGISTER >>> sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.735 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Call-Id: >>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI. >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.735 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.736 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NIST(1274519418) *** >>> CREATED *** - >>> NIST|ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf448888 >>> 6f02b-1---d8754z-|REGISTER >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.737 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NIST(1274519418) >>> Event(SIPMessage) - REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.738 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] TRANSACTION: (NIST) REGISTER >>> sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 State: 0 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.739 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NIST(1274519418) >>> StateIdle->StateTrying >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.748 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Finding transaction for >>> REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.748 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Setting Transaction ID to >>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e69fe7 >>> 80e6bacb|REGISTER >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.749 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.749 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] *** CREATING TRANSACTION >>> (NICT) *** >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.749 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Message: REGISTER >>> sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.749 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Call-Id: >>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI. >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.749 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.750 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) *** >>> CREATED *** - >>> NICT|ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e >>> 69fe780e6bacb|REGISTER >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.751 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) >>> Event(SIPMessage) - REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.751 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] TRANSACTION: (NICT) REGISTER >>> sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0 State: 0 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.752 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) >>> StateIdle->StateTrying(REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net SIP/2.0) >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.752 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Timer E( >>> 500 ms ) STARTED >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.752 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Timer F( >>> 10000 ms ) STARTED >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.757 INF: [CID=0x0e84] >>> REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net >>> SIP/2.0 DST: 10.232.4.69:5060:UDP SRC: 10.70.3.200:5060 enc=0 bytes=825 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] REGISTER sip:sip.xyz.net >>> SIP/2.0 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] From: "123456" >>> <sip:12...@si...>;tag=5b2f4a5c >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] To: "123456" >>> <sip:12...@si...> >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>> 10.70.3.200:5060;branch=z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e69fe780e6bacb;uas-addr=10. >>> 232.4.69;x-reg-id=c2lwOjAzNDEzNTUyNTUyMUAxOTIuMTY4LjE3OC42NDo3MzQ0 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>> 192.168.10.3:7344;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf4488886f02b-1---d8754z-;rport=7 >>> 344;received=192.168.10.3 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] CSeq: 1 REGISTER >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Call-ID: >>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI. >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Contact: >>> <sip:123456@10.70.3.200:5062;x-reg-id=sip%3A192.168.10.3%3A7344;rinstance=00 >>> 1e862ffef9c5cd> >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] User-Agent: X-Lite >>> release 1014k stamp 47051 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Expires: 1800 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Max-Forwards: 70 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Allow: INVITE, ACK, >>> CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Supported: timer >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Content-Length: 0 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.758 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.760 PWL: [CID=0x0000] Using Iface: 10.70.3.200 to >>> send to Dest: 10.232.4.69 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 INF: [CID=0x0e84] <<< SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>> SRC: 10.232.4.69:5060:UDP enc=0 bytes=571 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] From: "123456" >>> <sip:12...@si...>;tag=5b2f4a5c >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] To: "123456" >>> <sip:12...@si...>;tag=1_1146_t12083_6eo6 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>> 10.70.3.200:5060;branch=z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e69fe780e6bacb;uas-addr=10. >>> 232.4.69;x-reg-id=c2lwOjAzNDEzNTUyNTUyMUAxOTIuMTY4LjE3OC42NDo3MzQ0;received= >>> 10.70.3.200 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>> 192.168.10.3:7344;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf4488886f02b-1---d8754z-;rport=7 >>> 344;received=192.168.10.3 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] CSeq: 1 REGISTER >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Call-ID: >>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI. >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Content-Length: 0 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.772 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.773 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Finding transaction for >>> SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.774 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Setting Transaction ID to >>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e69fe7 >>> 80e6bacb|REGISTER >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.774 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] Found >>> NICT|ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e >>> 69fe780e6bacb|REGISTER >>> for SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.776 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) >>> Event(SIPMessage) - SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.776 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] TRANSACTION: (NICT) SIP/2.0 >>> 403 Forbidden AOR State: 1 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.776 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) >>> StateTrying->StateCompleted >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.776 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Timer E >>> STOPPED >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.776 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Timer F >>> STOPPED >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.777 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Finding transaction for >>> SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.778 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Setting Transaction ID to >>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf4488886f02b >>> -1---d8754z-|REGISTER >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.778 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] Found >>> NIST|ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf448888 >>> 6f02b-1---d8754z-|REGISTER >>> for SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.779 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Timer K( >>> 5000 ms ) STARTED >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.780 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NIST(1274519418) >>> Event(SIPMessage) - SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.780 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] TRANSACTION: (NIST) SIP/2.0 >>> 403 Forbidden AOR State: 1 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.781 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] >>> NIST(1274519418)HandleStateTrying->StateCompleted >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 INF: [CID=0x0e84] >>> SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>> DST: 192.168.10.3:7344:UDP SRC: 10.70.3.200:5060 enc=0 bytes=389 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden AOR >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] From: "123456" >>> <sip:12...@si...>;tag=5b2f4a5c >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] To: "123456" >>> <sip:12...@si...>;tag=1_1146_t12083_6eo6 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >>> 192.168.10.3:7344;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-24dbf4488886f02b-1---d8754z-;rport=7 >>> 344;received=192.168.10.3 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] CSeq: 1 REGISTER >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Call-ID: >>> ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI. >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] Content-Length: 0 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.785 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.786 PWL: [CID=0x0000] Using Iface: 10.70.3.200 to >>> send to Dest: 192.168.10.3 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:52.788 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NIST(1274519418) Timer J( >>> 32000 ms ) STARTED >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.769 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Timer K( >>> 5000 ms ) EXPIRED >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.770 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Event( >>> Timer-K ) Interval: 5000 >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.771 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) Event(Final) >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.771 DTL: [CID=0x0000] *** REMOVED TRANSACTION *** >>> NICT|ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e >>> 69fe780e6bacb|REGISTER >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.772 DBG: [CID=0x0000] GC: First Stale Object >>> SIPTransaction >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.773 DBG: [CID=0x0e84] TRANSACTION: (NICT) DESTROYED >>> 2008/09/11 21:13:57.773 DTL: [CID=0x0e84] NICT(1274519419) *** >>> DESTROYED *** - >>> NICT|ZjVhM2M4ZDQ5NjQwMzViYzIwMDc1MWY2NWUwZDZlNWI.|z9hG4bK0cf3c070a37edd1180e >>> 69fe780e6bacb|REGISTER >> >> >> >>> Many thanks in advance. >> >> >>> Andre >> >> >> >>>>>>> Andre >>>>>>> >>>>>>> jo...@op... schrieb: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Andre, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, the new code are in. What kind of issue are you bumping into? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Joegen >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> André Mamitzsch wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Joegen, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I have a couple of issues with the upper registration in my test >>>>>>>>>>>> lab. >>>>>>>>>>>> Before I start troubleshooting - can you confirm that the new code >>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>> committed. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Andre >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> jo...@op... schrieb: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I have recently committed code for shared line appearance (SLA) >>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>> would render upper registration to temporarily not function (Local >>>>>>>>>>>> Reg >>>>>>>>>>>> should be ok). This is just temporarily until I've committed the >>>>>>>>>>>> revised code for upper reg which is anticipated to be completed by >>>>>>>>>>>> tomorrow. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Joegen >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>> ------ >>>>>>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>>>>>>>>> challenge >>>>>>>>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win >>>>>>>>>>>> great prizes >>>>>>>>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in >>>>>>>>>>>> the world >>>>>>>>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>> ope...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------>>>>>>> - >>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>>>> challenge >>>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>>>>> prizes >>>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >>>>>>> world >>>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>>>> ope...@li... >>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>>>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>>>>>> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.19/1660 - Release Date: >>>>>>> 9/8/2008 6:39 PM >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>> ------ >>>>>>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>>>>>>>>> challenge >>>>>>>>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win >>>>>>>>>>>> great prizes >>>>>>>>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in >>>>>>>>>>>> the world >>>>>>>>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>> ope...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge >>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>> prizes >>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.19/1663 - Release Date: >>> 9/9/2008 7:04 PM >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>>>>>> challenge >>>>>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>>>>>>> prizes >>>>>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >>>>>>>>> world >>>>>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>>>>>> ope...@li... >>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>>>>>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>>>>>>>> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.19/1665 - Release Date: >>>>>>>>> 9/10/2008 7:00 PM >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>>>>> challenge >>>>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>>>>>> prizes >>>>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >>>>>>>> world >>>>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>>>>> ope...@li... >>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------->>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>>>>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>>>>>>> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.19/1665 - Release Date: >>>>>>>> 9/10/2008 7:00 PM >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------>>>>>>> - >>>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>>>>> challenge >>>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>>>>> prizes >>>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the >>>>>>> world >>>>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>>>> ope...@li... >>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge >> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >> prizes >> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.21/1667 - Release Date: >> 9/11/2008 6:55 PM >> >> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's >>>> challenge >>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>>> prizes >>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>> ope...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> >>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>>> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.21/1667 - Release Date: 9/11/2008 >>>> 6:55 PM >>>> >>>> >> >> >> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge >>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >>> prizes >>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> > > - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great > prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFIyp7CQKZIuVrbkWoRAhmMAJ9RTlOvn3MQpxkmVOVbFOEKCeduUwCeKlPL > Kr/DcxtdVMoAxImk4PXsWKg= > =4Pfw > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > |
|
From: Ronald de J. <rde...@so...> - 2008-09-27 04:36:44
|
Hi Joegen, This is the previous problem with osbc that crashes using the version 1.1.5-4 (Release-Date: May 15 2008 01:46:55). I notice that after the osbc crash, it shows the following: bash-3.00$ terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::length_error' what(): basic_string::replace Im not sure if this can help to find out the problem. Unfortunately there was no core logs generate after the crash. Let me know if the b2bua logs is needed so I can send it in separate email. Regards, Ron |
|
From: OpenSIPStack F. <ope...@op...> - 2008-09-26 07:42:40
|
so r u working on the dialer if so then my recommendation is try to make it like a dialer with atleast 2 forms, one will be the settings and the other will be the dialer. let me know if u need any help |
18 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
