opensipstack-devel Mailing List for OpenSIPStack (Page 11)
Brought to you by:
joegenbaclor
Menu
▾
▴
opensipstack-devel
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2006 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(5) |
Jun
(12) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(24) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(41) |
Dec
(67) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 |
Jan
(51) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(54) |
Apr
(76) |
May
(114) |
Jun
(133) |
Jul
(124) |
Aug
(180) |
Sep
(53) |
Oct
(41) |
Nov
(109) |
Dec
(92) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(52) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(29) |
Apr
(40) |
May
(83) |
Jun
(68) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(72) |
Sep
(50) |
Oct
(48) |
Nov
(25) |
Dec
(80) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(67) |
May
|
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(10) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
(5) |
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2013 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: <jo...@op...> - 2008-11-25 14:22:14
|
voice wrote: > This creates obj_linux_x86_r and obj_linux_x86_d. What are there 2? Whats > the difference between the 2? > obj_linux_x86_r -> release version obj_linux_x86_d -> debug version > Also created are 2 XML's One is called sip-trunk.conf.xml, which looks like > a template to cut and paste into web admin screen. > It would be easy to know. check the content of Version.h in OpenSBC. if you see the revision number is 39, then you got the latest #define SBC_MAJOR_VERSION 1 #define SBC_MINOR_VERSION 1 #define SBC_BUILD_NUMBER 5 #define SBC_REVISION_NUMBER 39 you can also run ./opensbc --version to check the version of the binary > but i don't see the send-reg="no". Is this something i should add or am i > still not getting the correct opensbc version> > > I did update the xml template to include send-reg in the sample account. So there is a big chance you got the wrong version. Joegen |
|
From: OpenSIPStack F. <ope...@op...> - 2008-11-23 21:39:40
|
hi,
i'm currently creating a step by step how to on OSBC-SIPX on the following scenario:
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:WordDocument>
<w:View>Normal</w:View>
<w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
<w:PunctuationKerning/>
<w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/>
<w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>
<w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent>
<w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>
<w:Compatibility>
<w:BreakWrappedTables/>
<w:SnapToGridInCell/>
<w:WrapTextWithPunct/>
<w:UseAsianBreakRules/>
<w:DontGrowAutofit/>
<w:UseFELayout/>
</w:Compatibility>
<w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>
</w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156">
</w:LatentStyles>
</xml><![endif]-->
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Batang;
panose-1:2 3 6 0 0 1 1 1 1 1;
mso-font-alt:바탕;
mso-font-charset:129;
mso-generic-font-family:auto;
mso-font-format:other;
mso-font-pitch:fixed;
mso-font-signature:1 151388160 16 0 524288 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:"\@Batang";
panose-1:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;
mso-font-charset:129;
mso-generic-font-family:auto;
mso-font-format:other;
mso-font-pitch:fixed;
mso-font-signature:1 151388160 16 0 524288 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{mso-style-parent:"";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-font-family:Batang;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;
mso-header-margin:.5in;
mso-footer-margin:.5in;
mso-paper-source:0;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
<!--[if gte mso 10]>
<style>
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-ansi-language:#0400;
mso-fareast-language:#0400;
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
</style>
<![endif]-->
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:WordDocument>
<w:View>Normal</w:View>
<w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
<w:PunctuationKerning/>
<w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/>
<w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>
<w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent>
<w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>
<w:Compatibility>
<w:BreakWrappedTables/>
<w:SnapToGridInCell/>
<w:WrapTextWithPunct/>
<w:UseAsianBreakRules/>
<w:DontGrowAutofit/>
<w:UseFELayout/>
</w:Compatibility>
<w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>
</w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156">
</w:LatentStyles>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if !mso]>
<object
classid="clsid:38481807-CA0E-42D2-BF39-B33AF135CC4D" id=ieooui>
</object>
<style>
st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }
</style>
<![endif]-->
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Batang;
panose-1:2 3 6 0 0 1 1 1 1 1;
mso-font-alt:바탕;
mso-font-charset:129;
mso-generic-font-family:auto;
mso-font-format:other;
mso-font-pitch:fixed;
mso-font-signature:1 151388160 16 0 524288 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:"\@Batang";
panose-1:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;
mso-font-charset:129;
mso-generic-font-family:auto;
mso-font-format:other;
mso-font-pitch:fixed;
mso-font-signature:1 151388160 16 0 524288 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{mso-style-parent:"";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-font-family:Batang;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;
mso-header-margin:.5in;
mso-footer-margin:.5in;
mso-paper-source:0;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
<!--[if gte mso 10]>
<style>
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-ansi-language:#0400;
mso-fareast-language:#0400;
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
</style>
<![endif]--><span style="font-family: Arial">{size:10pt}-Registering
a NAT'd UA to OSBC with Upper Reg {size}</span>
<span style="font-family: Arial">{size:10pt}
-calls between UAs behind NAT
-calls to PSTN
-calls from PSTN
-registering OSBC to a trunk provider
-routing of inbound calls from a trunk provider
-routing of outbound calls to a trunk{size}</span>
<span style="font-family: Arial">{size:10pt} the setup is using sipx and osbc on the same machine,both nic has public ip address.
{size}</span>
i'll be updating the list when the docs is available within this week.
raymund
|
|
From: OpenSIPStack F. <ope...@op...> - 2008-11-18 14:28:53
|
Thanks for the clarification. I tried Sjphone and Kapanga and the problem occurs. With other phones/softphones no problem. I don't know... I'll investigate to know if those softphone are bugged. For now thanks for the support.
Regards,
Antonio.
> {quote:title=Guest wrote:}{quote}Got your log. Same case, but not quite. In your case the UA which
> offered QOP did not send "any" authorization header in BYE. This is a
> UA problem, not OpenSBC. Your UA should have sent a new authorization
> header to update the previous authorization send in the INVITE
> challenge. OpenSBC does not participate in mid dialog request
> authentication except acting as a relay. It is also impossible for
> OpenSBC to reproduce the QOP state without knowing the exact password
> used to produce the original response. If OpenSBC "CAN" do this, then
> QOP is in big trouble for obvious reasons.
>
> OpenSIPStack Forum wrote:
> > I have the exact same problem with the latest CVS version 1.1.5-36.
> >
> > The softswitch replies to the BYE with a "400 Bad Request".
> >
> >
> >
> > I'll provide level 5 log and wireshark capture.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> >
> >
> > Antonio.
> >
> >
> >
> >
|
|
From: <jo...@op...> - 2008-11-17 16:15:56
|
Got your log. Same case, but not quite. In your case the UA which
offered QOP did not send "any" authorization header in BYE. This is a
UA problem, not OpenSBC. Your UA should have sent a new authorization
header to update the previous authorization send in the INVITE
challenge. OpenSBC does not participate in mid dialog request
authentication except acting as a relay. It is also impossible for
OpenSBC to reproduce the QOP state without knowing the exact password
used to produce the original response. If OpenSBC "CAN" do this, then
QOP is in big trouble for obvious reasons.
OpenSIPStack Forum wrote:
> I have the exact same problem with the latest CVS version 1.1.5-36.
>
>
> The softswitch replies to the BYE with a "400 Bad Request".
>
>
> I'll provide level 5 log and wireshark capture.
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
> Antonio.
>
>
>
>
>
>> {quote:title=Guest wrote:}{quote}Andre,
>>
>> If it's not much trouble. Please provide level 5 log and wireshark
>> capture from the sbc box.
>>
>> Joegen
>>
>> André Mamitzsch wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Joegen,
>>>
>>> I have tested against the latest CVS version, 1.1.5-27, still no
>>> success. The softswitch still responds with a "400 Bad Request".
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Andre
>>>
>>> jo...@op... schrieb:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Andre,
>>>>
>>>> This is a known problem area in OpenSBC. Since we are a B2BUA and not a
>>>> proxy we terminate our dialogs based on successful processing of a BYE
>>>> request. OpenSBC does not wait for a final response before it destroys
>>>> connections. This ensures that the SBC does not end up with ghost
>>>> sessions as well if a certain UA is not able to handle authenticated BYE
>>>> requests. This is the second time I have received this report regarding
>>>> this problem. Can you provide me a with a level 5 log for this
>>>> problematic call offlist? I'll see if an easy workaround is possible.
>>>> If you could, please also attach a wire shark capture of the successful
>>>> call you made using a UA directly calling your softswitch. My e-mail
>>>> address is jo...@op...
>>>>
>>>> Joegen
>>>>
>>>> André Mamitzsch wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have seen a strange behavior with the OpenSBC1.1.5RC1. The scenario is
>>>>> as follows:
>>>>>
>>>>> The OpenSBC is configured in B2BUAUpperReg mode.
>>>>>
>>>>> I place a call from a SIP client (A) to a PSTN Phone (B). The connection
>>>>> is established whithout any problems. A goes on hook and sends a BYE to
>>>>> which the SBC immediately replies with a 200 OK.
>>>>>
>>>>> Another BYE message is being sent out to the softswitch platform.
>>>>>
>>>>> The softswitch challenges authentication and therefore responds with a
>>>>> 401 unauthorized message. Since the SBC, at least that's my assumption,
>>>>> has already successfully terminated the internal connection there is no
>>>>> match and the requested authenticated BYE will never be send out. This
>>>>> behavior results in ghost connections and the billing runs until B goes
>>>>> on-hook as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have tested the same scenario with my SIP client directly connected to
>>>>> our softswitch platform and did not detect the problem there. Upon
>>>>> receiving the 401 unauthorized message, the client resends the BYE
>>>>> containing the authentication information.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have checked the RFC 3261 this morning and tried to find out whether
>>>>> it is a regular behavior to reply to a BYE message with authentication
>>>>> challenge or not. I could not find any hint there.
>>>>>
>>>>> How difficult is it to change this behavior and wait for confirmation
>>>>> before terminating the entire connection ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Andre
>>>>> -----
>>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
>>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
>>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
>>>>> [http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/]
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list
>>>>> ope...@li...
>>>>> [https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel]
>>>>> -----
>>>>>
>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>> Checked by AVG - [http://www.avg.com]
>>>>> Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.2/1743 - Release Date: 10/24/2008 8:33 AM
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----
>>>>>
>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
>>>> [http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/]
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list
>>>> ope...@li...
>>>> [https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel]-----
>>>>
>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
>>> [http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/]
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list
>>> ope...@li...
>>> [https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel]
>>> -----
>>>
>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> Checked by AVG - [http://www.avg.com]
>>> Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.3/1748 - Release Date: 10/26/2008 7:53 PM
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
>> [http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/]
>> _______________________________________________
>> opensipstack-devel mailing list
>> ope...@li...
>> [https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel]
>>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> opensipstack-devel mailing list
> ope...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.4/1793 - Release Date: 11/16/2008 7:58 PM
>
>
|
|
From: OpenSIPStack F. <ope...@op...> - 2008-11-17 11:52:20
|
I have the exact same problem with the latest CVS version 1.1.5-36.
The softswitch replies to the BYE with a "400 Bad Request".
I'll provide level 5 log and wireshark capture.
Regards.
Antonio.
> {quote:title=Guest wrote:}{quote}Andre,
>
> If it's not much trouble. Please provide level 5 log and wireshark
> capture from the sbc box.
>
> Joegen
>
> André Mamitzsch wrote:
> > Hello Joegen,
> >
> > I have tested against the latest CVS version, 1.1.5-27, still no
> > success. The softswitch still responds with a "400 Bad Request".
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Andre
> >
> > jo...@op... schrieb:
> >
> > > Andre,
> > >
> > > This is a known problem area in OpenSBC. Since we are a B2BUA and not a
> > > proxy we terminate our dialogs based on successful processing of a BYE
> > > request. OpenSBC does not wait for a final response before it destroys
> > > connections. This ensures that the SBC does not end up with ghost
> > > sessions as well if a certain UA is not able to handle authenticated BYE
> > > requests. This is the second time I have received this report regarding
> > > this problem. Can you provide me a with a level 5 log for this
> > > problematic call offlist? I'll see if an easy workaround is possible.
> > > If you could, please also attach a wire shark capture of the successful
> > > call you made using a UA directly calling your softswitch. My e-mail
> > > address is jo...@op...
> > >
> > > Joegen
> > >
> > > André Mamitzsch wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I have seen a strange behavior with the OpenSBC1.1.5RC1. The scenario is
> > > > as follows:
> > > >
> > > > The OpenSBC is configured in B2BUAUpperReg mode.
> > > >
> > > > I place a call from a SIP client (A) to a PSTN Phone (B). The connection
> > > > is established whithout any problems. A goes on hook and sends a BYE to
> > > > which the SBC immediately replies with a 200 OK.
> > > >
> > > > Another BYE message is being sent out to the softswitch platform.
> > > >
> > > > The softswitch challenges authentication and therefore responds with a
> > > > 401 unauthorized message. Since the SBC, at least that's my assumption,
> > > > has already successfully terminated the internal connection there is no
> > > > match and the requested authenticated BYE will never be send out. This
> > > > behavior results in ghost connections and the billing runs until B goes
> > > > on-hook as well.
> > > >
> > > > I have tested the same scenario with my SIP client directly connected to
> > > > our softswitch platform and did not detect the problem there. Upon
> > > > receiving the 401 unauthorized message, the client resends the BYE
> > > > containing the authentication information.
> > > >
> > > > I have checked the RFC 3261 this morning and tried to find out whether
> > > > it is a regular behavior to reply to a BYE message with authentication
> > > > challenge or not. I could not find any hint there.
> > > >
> > > > How difficult is it to change this behavior and wait for confirmation
> > > > before terminating the entire connection ?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Andre
> > > > -----
> > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
> > > > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
> > > > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> > > > [http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/]
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > opensipstack-devel mailing list
> > > > ope...@li...
> > > > [https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel]
> > > > -----
> > > >
> > > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > > Checked by AVG - [http://www.avg.com]
> > > > Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.2/1743 - Release Date: 10/24/2008 8:33 AM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----
> > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
> > > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
> > > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> > > [http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/]
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > opensipstack-devel mailing list
> > > ope...@li...
> > > [https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel]-----
> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
> > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
> > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> > [http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/]
> > _______________________________________________
> > opensipstack-devel mailing list
> > ope...@li...
> > [https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel]
> > -----
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG - [http://www.avg.com]
> > Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.3/1748 - Release Date: 10/26/2008 7:53 PM
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> -----
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> [http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/]
> _______________________________________________
> opensipstack-devel mailing list
> ope...@li...
> [https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel]
|
|
From: Imran K. <Im...@wi...> - 2008-11-14 16:25:44
|
Hi, I get the following error when I start Groomer and send data from my client to the LB: 'SIP/2.0 405 Not Processing Request' (on the Load balancer - SIP 405 is method not allowed?) This is the whole message: 2008-11-14 18:08:07:871 1226682487.871622: Continuing call on unexpected message for Call-Id '3-3045@192.168.1.115': while expecting '100' (index 1), received 'SIP/2.0 405 Not Processing Request^M From: "client1" <sip:cl...@op...:5060>;tag=3^M To: <sip:cl...@op...>^M Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.136:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-3045-3-0;rport=5060;received=192.168.1 .115^M CSeq: 100 REGISTER^M Call-ID: 3-3045@192.168.1.115^M Server: OpenSBCGroomer 1.0.0-9^M Content-Length: 0^M I still cant send signaling signaling to the server I get stick till the load balancer. Client->load balancer-> server I started the webbrowser of LB on 5060. Then I started the groomer on 5070.. In the OBproxy I set the adres to LB_IP:5070. In theory I should start to receive the signaling trough the LB on my server now right? TiA. Regards, Imran -----Original Message----- From: jo...@op... [mailto:joe...@gm...] Sent: vrijdag 14 november 2008 2:42 To: ope...@op...; ope...@li... Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] OSBC - load balancing Just set the address of the groomer as the OBProxy in the Outbound-Proxy list in web admin. How To Run: ./osbcgroomer -ttttt -p process-id.txt -r route.xml -i sip:192.168.0.253:5060 usage: -v|-h -t Trace level. Example -ttt means Log Level 3 -h --help output this help message and exit -v --version display version information and exit -p --pid-file name or absolute path for pid file -r --route-xml-file name or absolute path for xml route file -i --interface-address interface address to be used for listener in SIP URI format How To Configure the route.xml Below is a sample rotue.xml file <routes prefix-match-length="3"> <block host="10.0.0.1" filter="1212" catch-all="sip:ha1.gateway.com"> </block> <block host="10.0.0.1" filter="00" catch-all="sip:ha2.gateway.com"> </block> <block host="*" catch-all="sip:everythingelse.gateway.com"> </block> </routes> The above simply means 1. All calls coming from 10.0.0.1 with prefix 1212 goes to ha1.gateway.com 2. All calls coming from 10.0.0.1 with prefix 00 goes to ha2.gateway.com 3. Everything else goes to everythingelse.gateway.com Joegen OpenSIPStack Forum wrote: > Hi, > > I tried much today to get the OpenSBC do load balancing. I did not succeed. > I would appreciate help if one knows: > * How to make xml such way that the servers1 and 2 will accept calls from LB > * Where to put these scripts? (how could they be started?) The startup procedure? > > TiA. > > Regards, > Imran > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ opensipstack-devel mailing list ope...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel |
|
From: Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...> - 2008-11-14 03:28:30
|
OpenSIPStack Forum wrote: > opensipstack compile error as following reports. > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > SIPTransaction.cxx: In member function 鈥楶UDPSocket* SIPTransactions::SIPTransaction::CreateUDPSocket()鈥? > I am unable to replicate using the latest CVS. I you haven't yet, download the latest and make sure you make clean before re-running configure and make. Joegen |
|
From: <jo...@op...> - 2008-11-14 01:42:39
|
Just set the address of the groomer as the OBProxy in the Outbound-Proxy list in web admin. How To Run: ./osbcgroomer -ttttt -p process-id.txt -r route.xml -i sip:192.168.0.253:5060 usage: -v|-h -t Trace level. Example -ttt means Log Level 3 -h --help output this help message and exit -v --version display version information and exit -p --pid-file name or absolute path for pid file -r --route-xml-file name or absolute path for xml route file -i --interface-address interface address to be used for listener in SIP URI format How To Configure the route.xml Below is a sample rotue.xml file <routes prefix-match-length="3"> <block host="10.0.0.1" filter="1212" catch-all="sip:ha1.gateway.com"> </block> <block host="10.0.0.1" filter="00" catch-all="sip:ha2.gateway.com"> </block> <block host="*" catch-all="sip:everythingelse.gateway.com"> </block> </routes> The above simply means 1. All calls coming from 10.0.0.1 with prefix 1212 goes to ha1.gateway.com 2. All calls coming from 10.0.0.1 with prefix 00 goes to ha2.gateway.com 3. Everything else goes to everythingelse.gateway.com Joegen OpenSIPStack Forum wrote: > Hi, > > I tried much today to get the OpenSBC do load balancing. I did not succeed. > I would appreciate help if one knows: > * How to make xml such way that the servers1 and 2 will accept calls from LB > * Where to put these scripts? (how could they be started?) The startup procedure? > > TiA. > > Regards, > Imran > > |
|
From: OpenSIPStack F. <ope...@op...> - 2008-11-13 16:34:50
|
Hi, I tried much today to get the OpenSBC do load balancing. I did not succeed. I would appreciate help if one knows: * How to make xml such way that the servers1 and 2 will accept calls from LB * Where to put these scripts? (how could they be started?) The startup procedure? TiA. Regards, Imran |
|
From: OpenSIPStack F. <ope...@op...> - 2008-11-13 13:53:26
|
opensipstack compile error as following reports.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIPTransaction.cxx: In member function 鈥楶UDPSocket* SIPTransactions::SIPTransaction::CreateUDPSocket()鈥?
SIPTransaction.cxx:790: error: expected primary-expression before 鈥?<鈥?token
SIPTransaction.cxx:790: error: expected primary-expression before 鈥?<鈥?token
SIPTransaction.cxx:790: error: expected primary-expression before 鈥?<鈥?token
SIPTransaction.cxx:790: error: expected primary-expression before 鈥?鈥?token
SIPTransaction.cxx:790: error: expected primary-expression before 鈥?鈥?token
SIPTransaction.cxx:791: error: expected `;' before 鈥楶IPSocket鈥?
SIPTransaction.cxx:792: error: expected primary-expression before 鈥?=鈥?token
SIPTransaction.cxx:792: error: expected primary-expression before 鈥?=鈥?token
SIPTransaction.cxx:792: error: expected primary-expression before 鈥?=鈥?token
SIPTransaction.cxx:792: error: expected primary-expression before 鈥?鈥?token
SIPTransaction.cxx:793: error: expected primary-expression before 鈥榣ocalAddress鈥?
SIPTransaction.cxx:793: error: expected `;' before 鈥榣ocalAddress鈥?
SIPTransaction.cxx:794: error: expected primary-expression before 鈥?>鈥?token
SIPTransaction.cxx:794: error: expected primary-expression before 鈥?>鈥?token
SIPTransaction.cxx:794: error: expected primary-expression before 鈥?>鈥?token
SIPTransaction.cxx:794: error: expected primary-expression before 鈥?鈥?token
SIPTransaction.cxx:795: error: expected `;' before 鈥榠f鈥?
SIPTransaction.cxx:803: error: 鈥榣ocalAddress鈥?was not declared in this scope
make[3]: *** [/opt/opensipstack/lib/obj_linux_x86_r/SIPTransaction.o] Error 1
|
|
From: OpenSIPStack F. <ope...@op...> - 2008-11-13 12:10:44
|
Hi, I installed the CVS version of OpenSBC. However, I did not manage to get Load balancing work with the osbcgroomer. I used the XML example (which came with the OpenSBCGroomer) and adjusted wioth my own IP's. I put the file in the same directory as the ossgroomer (obj_linnux_d) I start it in the shell with "./osbcgroomer -r route.xml -i sip:ip.x.x.x:5060 " where the IP is the server. I get a notification "Enable to load Route File" (where I believe the developer meant unable?) If my set up is Internet -> OpenSBC_Load_Balancer -> (OpenSBCserver1 | OpenSBCserver2) How will I let the LB communicate in load balancing way with either server1 or 2? I'm new into the OpenSBC project and did not find any trail to do Load balancing with OpenSBC. If there is any document regarding this I'm very interested in it. One other point: [http://www.opensourcesip.org:8080/clearspacex/docs/DOC-1031|d-1031] I came across this document, but its for the older version of OpenSBC. Is there such document for the 1.1.5 version of OpenSBC? Is it possible to do Load balancing within the GUI of OpenSBC? Any help would be apreciated. regards, Imran |
|
From: haripriya a. <har...@re...> - 2008-11-13 12:01:13
|
Hi, I have created a dll using opensipstack library in dialog based application in Microsoft Visual C++ 6.0 . But i am unable to run that one in all systems ( I am using release version only ). Its error free only in .NET installed system. May i know the minimal set required to run in all the systems. Thanks in Advance. |
|
From: Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...> - 2008-11-13 09:07:06
|
It is already in CVS OpenSIPStack Forum wrote: > Hi, > > > Thanks for such a fast answer. > I'm using the RC1 of OpenSBC. There isnt such file file under Tools. Under Tools there is: SBCLaunchPad SQPlus Tail. Is it a feature coming with the cvs? > > > Regards, > Imran > > > |
|
From: OpenSIPStack F. <ope...@op...> - 2008-11-13 09:00:19
|
Hi, Thanks for such a fast answer. I'm using the RC1 of OpenSBC. There isnt such file file under Tools. Under Tools there is: SBCLaunchPad SQPlus Tail. Is it a feature coming with the cvs? Regards, Imran |
|
From: <jo...@op...> - 2008-11-13 01:18:57
|
You can use the OpenSBCGroomer under Tools/OpenSBCGroomer to do the load balancing for you. It goes with a sample XML file to demonstrate routing. OpenSIPStack Forum wrote: > Hi, > > > > > > How is load balancing accomplished with the newer versions of OpenSBC? > > > I have 2 (OpenSBC)servers which should communicate with with 1(OpenSBC) Load Balancing instance . > > > In the newer versions i dont see the relay routes. In Proxy-Rela-Routes i see seperate fields. The information filled in this menu is not enough to get the load balancer do "load balancing". > > > > > > Regards, > > > Imran > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.2/1784 - Release Date: 11/12/2008 7:01 PM > > |
|
From: OpenSIPStack F. <ope...@op...> - 2008-11-12 16:55:55
|
Hi, How is load balancing accomplished with the newer versions of OpenSBC? I have 2 (OpenSBC)servers which should communicate with with 1(OpenSBC) Load Balancing instance . In the newer versions i dont see the relay routes. In Proxy-Rela-Routes i see seperate fields. The information filled in this menu is not enough to get the load balancer do "load balancing". Regards, Imran |
|
From: Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...> - 2008-11-08 01:41:03
|
Thanks for reporting. I've commited a patch in CVS. Joegen OpenSIPStack Forum wrote: > I was trying to install opensipstack (version 1.1.11) and I had this error: > > > > > > SIPTransaction.cxx: In member function 'PUDPSocket* SIPTransactions::SIPTransaction::CreateUDPSocket()': > SIPTransaction.cxx:784: error: conversion from 'Tools::OString' to non-scalar type 'PIPSocket::Address' requested > make[2]: *** [/usr/local/opensipstack/lib/obj_linux_x86_r/SIPTransaction.o] Error 1 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/opensipstack/src' > make[1]: *** [optnoshared] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/opensipstack/src' > make: *** [optnoshared] Error 2 > > > > > > I see in the file at line #784 that was wrote: > > > PIPSocket::Address localAddress = m_InterfaceAddress; > > > > > > I change this line to > > > PIPSocket::Address localAddress = PIPSocket::Address(m_InterfaceAddress); > > > and the I dont have any error... > > > |
|
From: OpenSIPStack F. <ope...@op...> - 2008-11-07 19:07:47
|
I was trying to install opensipstack (version 1.1.11) and I had this error: SIPTransaction.cxx: In member function 'PUDPSocket* SIPTransactions::SIPTransaction::CreateUDPSocket()': SIPTransaction.cxx:784: error: conversion from 'Tools::OString' to non-scalar type 'PIPSocket::Address' requested make[2]: *** [/usr/local/opensipstack/lib/obj_linux_x86_r/SIPTransaction.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/opensipstack/src' make[1]: *** [optnoshared] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/opensipstack/src' make: *** [optnoshared] Error 2 I see in the file at line #784 that was wrote: PIPSocket::Address localAddress = m_InterfaceAddress; I change this line to PIPSocket::Address localAddress = PIPSocket::Address(m_InterfaceAddress); and the I dont have any error... |
|
From: Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...> - 2008-11-07 09:02:38
|
I wish I could help you further here but I do not have the slightest idea what's causing your linking error. Surely, OpenSIPStack works links well in release build because I use it everyday when compiling OpenSBC. Have you tried ignoring the multiple definitions using /FORCE:MULTIPLE liker flag. In most cases, /FORCE:MULTIPLE works for me in the past. But sometimes it results to a corrupted binary. Joegen OpenSIPStack Forum wrote: > Hi Joegen, > > > I checked the Multi-threaded DLL option in code generation tab. I have attached the VCPROJ text file with the email. It contains both debug and Release configuration details. For debug it complied fine but for release I get mentioned link errors. > > > Thanks. > > |
|
From: OpenSIPStack F. <ope...@op...> - 2008-11-07 06:43:39
|
Hi Joegen,
I checked the Multi-threaded DLL option in code generation tab. I have attached the VCPROJ text file with the email. It contains both debug and Release configuration details. For debug it complied fine but for release I get mentioned link errors.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="Windows-1252"?>
<VisualStudioProject
ProjectType="Visual C++"
Version="8.00"
Name="SIPUA"
ProjectGUID="{152F59B3-DF8A-47F8-8F88-F8DC54A628DA}"
RootNamespace="SIPUA"
Keyword="Win32Proj"
>
<Platforms>
<Platform
Name="Win32"
/>
</Platforms>
<ToolFiles>
</ToolFiles>
<Configurations>
<Configuration
Name="Debug|Win32"
OutputDirectory="$(SolutionDir)$(ConfigurationName)"
IntermediateDirectory="$(ConfigurationName)"
ConfigurationType="2"
CharacterSet="1"
>
<Tool
Name="VCPreBuildEventTool"
/>
<Tool
Name="VCCustomBuildTool"
/>
<Tool
Name="VCXMLDataGeneratorTool"
/>
<Tool
Name="VCWebServiceProxyGeneratorTool"
/>
<Tool
Name="VCMIDLTool"
/>
<Tool
Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
Optimization="0"
AdditionalIncludeDirectories="C:\BCM\Code\crm_bcm\bcm\dev\sandbox\jaydeep.gupta\opensipstack_src-1.1.7\opensipstack\include"
PreprocessorDefinitions="WIN32;_DEBUG;_WINDOWS;_USRDLL;SIPUA_EXPORTS"
MinimalRebuild="true"
BasicRuntimeChecks="3"
RuntimeLibrary="3"
UsePrecompiledHeader="2"
WarningLevel="3"
Detect64BitPortabilityProblems="true"
DebugInformationFormat="4"
/>
<Tool
Name="VCManagedResourceCompilerTool"
/>
<Tool
Name="VCResourceCompilerTool"
/>
<Tool
Name="VCPreLinkEventTool"
/>
<Tool
Name="VCLinkerTool"
AdditionalDependencies="C:\BCM\Code\crm_bcm\bcm\dev\sandbox\jaydeep.gupta\opensipstack_src-1.1.7\opensipstack\lib\opensipstackd.lib"
LinkIncremental="2"
GenerateDebugInformation="true"
SubSystem="2"
TargetMachine="1"
/>
<Tool
Name="VCALinkTool"
/>
<Tool
Name="VCManifestTool"
/>
<Tool
Name="VCXDCMakeTool"
/>
<Tool
Name="VCBscMakeTool"
/>
<Tool
Name="VCFxCopTool"
/>
<Tool
Name="VCAppVerifierTool"
/>
<Tool
Name="VCWebDeploymentTool"
/>
<Tool
Name="VCPostBuildEventTool"
/>
</Configuration>
<Configuration
Name="Release|Win32"
OutputDirectory="$(SolutionDir)$(ConfigurationName)"
IntermediateDirectory="$(ConfigurationName)"
ConfigurationType="2"
CharacterSet="1"
WholeProgramOptimization="1"
>
<Tool
Name="VCPreBuildEventTool"
/>
<Tool
Name="VCCustomBuildTool"
/>
<Tool
Name="VCXMLDataGeneratorTool"
/>
<Tool
Name="VCWebServiceProxyGeneratorTool"
/>
<Tool
Name="VCMIDLTool"
/>
<Tool
Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
AdditionalIncludeDirectories="C:\BCM\Code\crm_bcm\bcm\dev\sandbox\jaydeep.gupta\opensipstack_src-1.1.7\opensipstack\include"
PreprocessorDefinitions="WIN32;NDEBUG;_WINDOWS;_USRDLL;SIPUA_EXPORTS"
RuntimeLibrary="2"
UsePrecompiledHeader="2"
WarningLevel="3"
Detect64BitPortabilityProblems="true"
DebugInformationFormat="3"
/>
<Tool
Name="VCManagedResourceCompilerTool"
/>
<Tool
Name="VCResourceCompilerTool"
/>
<Tool
Name="VCPreLinkEventTool"
/>
<Tool
Name="VCLinkerTool"
AdditionalDependencies="C:\BCM\Code\crm_bcm\bcm\dev\sandbox\jaydeep.gupta\opensipstack_src-1.1.7\opensipstack\lib\opensipstack.lib"
LinkIncremental="1"
GenerateDebugInformation="true"
SubSystem="2"
OptimizeReferences="2"
EnableCOMDATFolding="2"
TargetMachine="1"
/>
<Tool
Name="VCALinkTool"
/>
<Tool
Name="VCManifestTool"
/>
<Tool
Name="VCXDCMakeTool"
/>
<Tool
Name="VCBscMakeTool"
/>
<Tool
Name="VCFxCopTool"
/>
<Tool
Name="VCAppVerifierTool"
/>
<Tool
Name="VCWebDeploymentTool"
/>
<Tool
Name="VCPostBuildEventTool"
/>
</Configuration>
</Configurations>
<References>
</References>
<Files>
<Filter
Name="Source Files"
Filter="cpp;c;cc;cxx;def;odl;idl;hpj;bat;asm;asmx"
UniqueIdentifier="{4FC737F1-C7A5-4376-A066-2A32D752A2FF}"
>
<File
RelativePath=".\SIPUA.cpp"
>
</File>
<File
RelativePath=".\stdafx.cpp"
>
<FileConfiguration
Name="Debug|Win32"
>
<Tool
Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
UsePrecompiledHeader="1"
/>
</FileConfiguration>
<FileConfiguration
Name="Release|Win32"
>
<Tool
Name="VCCLCompilerTool"
UsePrecompiledHeader="1"
/>
</FileConfiguration>
</File>
</Filter>
<Filter
Name="Header Files"
Filter="h;hpp;hxx;hm;inl;inc;xsd"
UniqueIdentifier="{93995380-89BD-4b04-88EB-625FBE52EBFB}"
>
<File
RelativePath=".\phoneapp.h"
>
</File>
<File
RelativePath=".\sipphone.h"
>
</File>
<File
RelativePath=".\SIPPhoneInterface.h"
>
</File>
<File
RelativePath=".\SIPUA.h"
>
</File>
<File
RelativePath=".\stdafx.h"
>
</File>
</Filter>
<Filter
Name="Resource Files"
Filter="rc;ico;cur;bmp;dlg;rc2;rct;bin;rgs;gif;jpg;jpeg;jpe;resx;tiff;tif;png;wav"
UniqueIdentifier="{67DA6AB6-F800-4c08-8B7A-83BB121AAD01}"
>
</Filter>
<File
RelativePath=".\ReadMe.txt"
>
</File>
</Files>
<Globals>
</Globals>
</VisualStudioProject>
Thanks.
|
|
From: <jo...@op...> - 2008-11-05 15:10:07
|
Try linking to the C++ runtime dynamically. From the looks of it, you are trying to use Multi-threaded static linking. Try using Multi-threaded DLL instead in your code generation. If you still encounter problems after, please send your linker command line. You can also compare your linker command line to the OpenSBC linker command line and see what you did differently. Joegen OpenSIPStack Forum wrote: > Hi there, > > > I am using the OpenSipStack library in my VCProject. I complied the library in release configuration. But as I start compilation of my project in release configuration it gives me following linking errors: > > > 1>libcmtd.lib(crt0dat.obj) : error LNK2005: _exit already defined in MSVCRT.lib(MSVCR80.dll) > > > 1>libcmtd.lib(crt0dat.obj) : error LNK2005: __exit already defined in MSVCRT.lib(MSVCR80.dll) > > > 1>libcmtd.lib(crt0dat.obj) : error LNK2005: __amsg_exit already defined in MSVCRT.lib(MSVCR80.dll) > > > 1>libcmtd.lib(crt0dat.obj) : error LNK2005: __initterm_e already defined in MSVCRT.lib(MSVCR80.dll) > > > 1>libcmtd.lib(winxfltr.obj) : error LNK2005: ___CppXcptFilter already defined in MSVCRT.lib(MSVCR80.dll) > > > 1>libcmtd.lib(dbgheap.obj) : error LNK2005: _malloc already defined in MSVCRT.lib(MSVCR80.dll) > > > 1>libcmtd.lib(dbgheap.obj) : error LNK2005: _calloc already defined in MSVCRT.lib(MSVCR80.dll) > > > 1>libcmtd.lib(dbgheap.obj) : error LNK2005: _realloc already defined in MSVCRT.lib(MSVCR80.dll) > > > 1>libcmtd.lib(dbgheap.obj) : error LNK2005: _free already defined in MSVCRT.lib(MSVCR80.dll) > > > Through this is working fine if I do compliation in debug configuration of both library and project. > > > Can anybody have some clues on this? > > > Thanks in advance. > > > Regards, > > > Jaydeep > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > |
|
From: OpenSIPStack F. <ope...@op...> - 2008-11-05 14:58:41
|
Hi there, I am using the OpenSipStack library in my VCProject. I complied the library in release configuration. But as I start compilation of my project in release configuration it gives me following linking errors: 1>libcmtd.lib(crt0dat.obj) : error LNK2005: _exit already defined in MSVCRT.lib(MSVCR80.dll) 1>libcmtd.lib(crt0dat.obj) : error LNK2005: __exit already defined in MSVCRT.lib(MSVCR80.dll) 1>libcmtd.lib(crt0dat.obj) : error LNK2005: __amsg_exit already defined in MSVCRT.lib(MSVCR80.dll) 1>libcmtd.lib(crt0dat.obj) : error LNK2005: __initterm_e already defined in MSVCRT.lib(MSVCR80.dll) 1>libcmtd.lib(winxfltr.obj) : error LNK2005: ___CppXcptFilter already defined in MSVCRT.lib(MSVCR80.dll) 1>libcmtd.lib(dbgheap.obj) : error LNK2005: _malloc already defined in MSVCRT.lib(MSVCR80.dll) 1>libcmtd.lib(dbgheap.obj) : error LNK2005: _calloc already defined in MSVCRT.lib(MSVCR80.dll) 1>libcmtd.lib(dbgheap.obj) : error LNK2005: _realloc already defined in MSVCRT.lib(MSVCR80.dll) 1>libcmtd.lib(dbgheap.obj) : error LNK2005: _free already defined in MSVCRT.lib(MSVCR80.dll) Through this is working fine if I do compliation in debug configuration of both library and project. Can anybody have some clues on this? Thanks in advance. Regards, Jaydeep |
|
From: <jo...@op...> - 2008-10-27 16:40:15
|
Hi, First, can I get your name so I can refer to you in a more personal manner? I am not familiar with ingate although there might be use for it for those who are using ingate already and would want to migrate to OSBC. If you are interested, we could start this systematically by you providing a network diagram of each of the setup you would want to accomplish. I would recommend dia http://www.gnome.org/projects/dia/ so we have a common editor. I could then provide the necessary configuration to make such setup work. You test the configuration and see if it satisfies your need. We then compile the docs and commit it in OpenSBC CVS under docs directory as well as publish an online version in the OSS forum. If you are amenable to this, we can do this in a regular basis until all your scenarios are satisfied. Joegen voice wrote: > Hi Joegen > > Using sipX 3.10.2 SBC and Gateway setup, i have gotten inGate's > firewall/siparator to facilitate/register Grandstream phones and make and > receive calls. > > I was thinking if i sent you my working inGate Dial Plan and other related > setups that you might find them helpful to document OSBC Howto sipX. > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.4/1749 - Release Date: 10/27/2008 7:57 AM > > |
|
From: voice <vo...@ne...> - 2008-10-27 16:22:40
|
Hi Joegen Using sipX 3.10.2 SBC and Gateway setup, i have gotten inGate's firewall/siparator to facilitate/register Grandstream phones and make and receive calls. I was thinking if i sent you my working inGate Dial Plan and other related setups that you might find them helpful to document OSBC Howto sipX. |
|
From: <jo...@op...> - 2008-10-27 15:47:24
|
Thanks to you, too for giving a comprehensive bug report. Andre Mamitzsch wrote: > Hi Joegen, > > my tests against the latest CVS version were successfull. Calls are > properly terminated now - we do not see ghost connections anymore. > Many thanks for the help and the quick fix. > > Andre > > jo...@op... schrieb: > >> Andre, >> >> If it's not much trouble. Please provide level 5 log and wireshark >> capture from the sbc box. >> >> Joegen >> >> André Mamitzsch wrote: >> >>> Hello Joegen, >>> >>> I have tested against the latest CVS version, 1.1.5-27, still no >>> success. The softswitch still responds with a "400 Bad Request". >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Andre >>> >>> jo...@op... schrieb: >>> >>> >>>> Andre, >>>> >>>> This is a known problem area in OpenSBC. Since we are a B2BUA and not a >>>> proxy we terminate our dialogs based on successful processing of a BYE >>>> request. OpenSBC does not wait for a final response before it destroys >>>> connections. This ensures that the SBC does not end up with ghost >>>> sessions as well if a certain UA is not able to handle authenticated BYE >>>> requests. This is the second time I have received this report regarding >>>> this problem. Can you provide me a with a level 5 log for this >>>> problematic call offlist? I'll see if an easy workaround is possible. >>>> If you could, please also attach a wire shark capture of the successful >>>> call you made using a UA directly calling your softswitch. My e-mail >>>> address is jo...@op... >>>> >>>> Joegen >>>> >>>> André Mamitzsch wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> I have seen a strange behavior with the OpenSBC1.1.5RC1. The scenario is >>>>> as follows: >>>>> >>>>> The OpenSBC is configured in B2BUAUpperReg mode. >>>>> >>>>> I place a call from a SIP client (A) to a PSTN Phone (B). The connection >>>>> is established whithout any problems. A goes on hook and sends a BYE to >>>>> which the SBC immediately replies with a 200 OK. >>>>> >>>>> Another BYE message is being sent out to the softswitch platform. >>>>> >>>>> The softswitch challenges authentication and therefore responds with a >>>>> 401 unauthorized message. Since the SBC, at least that's my assumption, >>>>> has already successfully terminated the internal connection there is no >>>>> match and the requested authenticated BYE will never be send out. This >>>>> behavior results in ghost connections and the billing runs until B goes >>>>> on-hook as well. >>>>> >>>>> I have tested the same scenario with my SIP client directly connected to >>>>> our softswitch platform and did not detect the problem there. Upon >>>>> receiving the 401 unauthorized message, the client resends the BYE >>>>> containing the authentication information. >>>>> >>>>> I have checked the RFC 3261 this morning and tried to find out whether >>>>> it is a regular behavior to reply to a BYE message with authentication >>>>> challenge or not. I could not find any hint there. >>>>> >>>>> How difficult is it to change this behavior and wait for confirmation >>>>> before terminating the entire connection ? >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Andre >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge >>>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes >>>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >>>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>> ope...@li... >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>>>> Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.2/1743 - Release Date: 10/24/2008 8:33 AM >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge >>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes >>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>> ope...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>> >>>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge >>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes >>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>> Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.3/1748 - Release Date: 10/26/2008 7:53 PM >>> >>> >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge >> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes >> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.3/1748 - Release Date: 10/26/2008 7:53 PM > > |
18 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
