opensipstack-devel Mailing List for OpenSIPStack (Page 9)
Brought to you by:
joegenbaclor
Menu
▾
▴
opensipstack-devel
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2006 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(5) |
Jun
(12) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(24) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(41) |
Dec
(67) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 |
Jan
(51) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(54) |
Apr
(76) |
May
(114) |
Jun
(133) |
Jul
(124) |
Aug
(180) |
Sep
(53) |
Oct
(41) |
Nov
(109) |
Dec
(92) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(52) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(29) |
Apr
(40) |
May
(83) |
Jun
(68) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(72) |
Sep
(50) |
Oct
(48) |
Nov
(25) |
Dec
(80) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(67) |
May
|
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(10) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
(5) |
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2013 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: voice <vo...@ne...> - 2008-12-15 16:26:42
|
Hi Joegen Is there a way for OSBC to turn off if from grabing all port:5060 and just have it grab the NIC:5060 that it has been manually set to in the Admin Param's? It seems that OSBC is grabing all the ports reguardless of of ipaddr settings in a duel NIC box. It does not matter is if set each NIC to same or different network addresses. I have tried to isolate OSBC and sipX from each other by manually seting the OSBC only to NIC1. This i believe should isloated the second NIC2 which is set to be used by sipX. OSBC and sipX both want to default to port:5060 for interal to both reasons. I have set OSBC to B2BusUpperRegister and. In this mode OSBC is passing registration and B2Bua is routing inbound calls to sipX. Why does it still want to manage all port:5060? Shouldn't manually setting NIC1 also shield NIC2 and applications using that NIC from OSBC? In sipX's config.defs defaults proxy setting is port:5060 and i have manually set MY_IP_ADDDR to ip of NIC2. This isolate the 2nd NIC1 from NIC2. OSBC still see's NIC2 and sipX and it's port:5060 settings. Could you please contact the guy who said he has OSBC and sipX running on the same box using 2 NIC's using Public addressing and ask him to publish his settings. There is something missing, a trick that is not immediately clear. OSBC is not documented and i guess the only way to get documentation is to buy Solegy but then that defeats the reason for this OpenSource. Also if both NIC's are set to public addressing then remote phones don't need to go through OSBC UpperRegistation to register the UA to sipX. And in this configuration i believe OSBC is broken. when calls are coming in from ITSP because there is no UA hy-jacking of registration, right? Your explanation below assumes that OSBC is configured to talk to an PSTN and not a ITSP (Internet SIP Trunk). ITSP:5060 and can't be ask to rewrite their gateway to listen on some other port. OSBC is setting between ITSP and sipX. Thus. ITSP:5060 <==> 5060:OSBC:5060 <==> 5060:sipX:5060 <==> 5060:UA. I have tried ITSP:5060 <==> 5060:OSBC:6060 <==> 6060:sipX:6060 <==> 6060:UA also but sipX fails even when remote phones are using sip port:6060 and something is gettign lost when making and recieving calls going thru sipX when it is NOT set port:5060. OSBC and sipX use additional progressive SIP related ports that may also overlap with OSBC which normally would not be a problem if OSBCdid not grab all ports:5060 and their direvitives like 5062, 5064 etc... OSBC should key in on NIC's and not PORTs. Is there a way to toggle OSBC off from looking beyound it's own Relm? t ----- Original Message ----- From: "OpenSIPStack Forum" <ope...@op...> To: <ope...@li...> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 10:47 AM Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Error ***Address already in use***** 2 > > Hi Robert, > > > By default, OSBC will listen to pot 5060 of all IP addresses configured on the box . If SIPX (or any opther application) is listening on port 5060 as well, then OSBC will detect it and give the error you have encountered. To avoid this, just configure OSBC to listen on a specific port and IP address. You can do this in the General Parameters > Interface Address section. For example, you can set it to listen to sip : 10.0.0.1 : 5060 which will cause it to use that IP address and port only. > > > As a general rule, if you are going to run SIPX and OSBC on the same box, it simplifies things to have two IP address (each plumbed to a separate NIC) and to force each application to listen only on its allocated IP address. > > > HTH > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. > The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help > pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel |
|
From: <jo...@op...> - 2008-12-12 09:03:26
|
I see it. Please try again using latest from CVS. Send me the logs again if this patch still has problems. ma...@as... wrote: > Hello Jogen, > > > i checked the latest CVS. The iassue is still same. Please check latest > level 5 logs.(attached) > > Regards, > > manoj > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > mail2web.com – What can On Demand Business Solutions do for you? > http://link.mail2web.com/Business/SharePoint > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. > The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help > pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.16/1842 - Release Date: 12/10/2008 6:53 PM > > |
|
From: <ma...@as...> - 2008-12-11 09:20:02
|
Hello Jogen, i checked the latest CVS. The iassue is still same. Please check latest level 5 logs.(attached) Regards, manoj -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web.com What can On Demand Business Solutions do for you? http://link.mail2web.com/Business/SharePoint |
|
From: <jo...@op...> - 2008-12-10 23:40:45
|
If OpenSBC instances now listen on different ports, your culprit is definitely another application which has already grabbed port 5060 prior to OpenSBC. If you are running sipX in port 5060 then it is sipX. You need to bind sipX to other ports or you may bind it to a different IP address other than 69.x.x.50. Here is the rule. NO TWO listeners, be it from two distinct applications, could share a common port/ip binding. The only time this may happen is if the applications are using different transports. For example, two listeners can share a common port if one is using TCP and the other is using UDP. This is why a SIP UA can listen on 5060 for both UDP and TCP simultaneously. HTH - (H)ope (T)hat (H)elps. :-) Joegen voice wrote: > Hi HTH > > Thanks for observations. > > I set in sipX Gateway/DialPlan too listen on :5080 > > i set OSBC to listen on :5060 in osbc NIC1 pointing to OSBC ipaddr == > 69.x.x.50 > i set OSBC to listen on :5080 in osbc NIC2 pointing to sipX ipaddr == > 69.x.x.100 > also in the B2BUA and UpperRegistration settings. > > Both nics share the same public network 69.x.x./24. Do you mean they should > not share but run on different networks like 40.x.x.x and 69.x.x.x? > > NIC2 shows NO more **ERROR** now running on port:5080 > > but > > NIC1 still shows Error ***Address already in use***** > > You know the guy who said he got OSBC and sipX on one box to work should > have run into the same problem. If you are listening please pipe up. > > I set B2BUA to pass To and From 5060 to 5080 vis versa. > I set Upper Registration from sip:* to :5080 > > How does OSBC sense sipX use of Ports? maybe i can un-sense it? kidding.... > > r > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "OpenSIPStack Forum" <ope...@op...> > To: <ope...@li...> > Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 10:47 AM > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Error ***Address already in use***** 2 > > > >> Hi Robert, >> >> >> By default, OSBC will listen to pot 5060 of all IP addresses configured >> > on the box . If SIPX (or any opther application) is listening on port > 5060 as well, then OSBC will detect it and give the error you have > encountered. To avoid this, just configure OSBC to listen on a specific > port and IP address. You can do this in the General Parameters > > Interface Address section. For example, you can set it to listen to sip : > 10.0.0.1 : 5060 which will cause it to use that IP address and port only. > >> As a general rule, if you are going to run SIPX and OSBC on the same box, >> > it simplifies things to have two IP address (each plumbed to a separate NIC) > and to force each application to listen only on its allocated IP address. > >> HTH >> >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > ---- > |
|
From: voice <vo...@ne...> - 2008-12-10 19:39:24
|
Hi HTH Thanks for observations. I set in sipX Gateway/DialPlan too listen on :5080 i set OSBC to listen on :5060 in osbc NIC1 pointing to OSBC ipaddr == 69.x.x.50 i set OSBC to listen on :5080 in osbc NIC2 pointing to sipX ipaddr == 69.x.x.100 also in the B2BUA and UpperRegistration settings. Both nics share the same public network 69.x.x./24. Do you mean they should not share but run on different networks like 40.x.x.x and 69.x.x.x? NIC2 shows NO more **ERROR** now running on port:5080 but NIC1 still shows Error ***Address already in use***** You know the guy who said he got OSBC and sipX on one box to work should have run into the same problem. If you are listening please pipe up. I set B2BUA to pass To and From 5060 to 5080 vis versa. I set Upper Registration from sip:* to :5080 How does OSBC sense sipX use of Ports? maybe i can un-sense it? kidding.... r ----- Original Message ----- From: "OpenSIPStack Forum" <ope...@op...> To: <ope...@li...> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 10:47 AM Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Error ***Address already in use***** 2 > > Hi Robert, > > > By default, OSBC will listen to pot 5060 of all IP addresses configured on the box . If SIPX (or any opther application) is listening on port 5060 as well, then OSBC will detect it and give the error you have encountered. To avoid this, just configure OSBC to listen on a specific port and IP address. You can do this in the General Parameters > Interface Address section. For example, you can set it to listen to sip : 10.0.0.1 : 5060 which will cause it to use that IP address and port only. > > > As a general rule, if you are going to run SIPX and OSBC on the same box, it simplifies things to have two IP address (each plumbed to a separate NIC) and to force each application to listen only on its allocated IP address. > > > HTH > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. > The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help > pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel |
|
From: OpenSIPStack F. <ope...@op...> - 2008-12-10 16:48:00
|
Hi Robert, By default, OSBC will listen to pot 5060 of all IP addresses configured on the box . If SIPX (or any opther application) is listening on port 5060 as well, then OSBC will detect it and give the error you have encountered. To avoid this, just configure OSBC to listen on a specific port and IP address. You can do this in the General Parameters > Interface Address section. For example, you can set it to listen to sip : 10.0.0.1 : 5060 which will cause it to use that IP address and port only. As a general rule, if you are going to run SIPX and OSBC on the same box, it simplifies things to have two IP address (each plumbed to a separate NIC) and to force each application to listen only on its allocated IP address. HTH |
|
From: voice <vo...@ne...> - 2008-12-10 15:27:47
|
Hi Anyone How do i fix Error ***Address already in use***** in the User Agent Name/Listener address? Your instruction were very clear about the possible causes. But other then several instances of OSBC what else could cause this problem. I get this ***error** in both NIC's viewed from the OSBC Transport Status. Does the OSBC see the sipX install or does OSBC see the Linux network settings or is it reading something twice? r |
|
From: Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...> - 2008-12-10 14:38:25
|
Hi Robert, You need to compile OpenSIPStack first and then OpenSBC. You error indicates that the library file is missing. Joegen voice wrote: > Hi Joegen > > download CVS opensipstack and opensbc > ./confgure opensipstack then opensbc > In the opensbc do make bothnoshared > > I reinstalled a fresh copy of CVS to see if this would fix the Listener > ***Error*** and ran into this problem > > No rule to make libpt_linux_x86_r_s.a > > What is this error? > > r > > |
|
From: voice <vo...@ne...> - 2008-12-09 20:07:05
|
Hi Joegen download CVS opensipstack and opensbc ./confgure opensipstack then opensbc In the opensbc do make bothnoshared I reinstalled a fresh copy of CVS to see if this would fix the Listener ***Error*** and ran into this problem No rule to make libpt_linux_x86_r_s.a What is this error? r |
|
From: <jo...@op...> - 2008-12-08 06:16:16
|
This issue should now be fixed in CVS. Please try the latest and confirm if the patch works for you. Thanks. jo...@op... wrote: > Thanks for the logs. I can see where it MAY go wrong. I will send in > a fix shortly. > > PS: No need to CC my email address when posting. Sending to > ope...@li... is enough. I am receiving > your emails twice. > > Joegen > > Manoj Joshi wrote: >> here u go...Log attached. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Joegen E. Baclor [mailto:joe...@gm...] >> Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2008 3:14 PM >> To: ope...@li... >> Cc: jo...@op... >> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Received response without transaction issue >> >> >> Send in the level 5 log please. >> >> Manoj Joshi wrote: >> >>> The issue is ....in case of session progress and connected we do not >>> get >>> encrypted response. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Manoj Joshi [mailto:ma...@as...] >>> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 5:24 PM >>> To: jo...@op...; ope...@li... >>> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Received response without transaction issue >>> >>> >>> I did what is mentioned in this link already...Actually registration >>> part >>> works fine but when i make call my SIP client doesn't receive any >>> message. >>> Besides i think this link refers to old OpenSBC version. In latest >>> version >>> there are many new parameters like "Enable backdoor port" and in B2BUA >>> >> route >> >>> section "Use Request to Route" etc.. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Manoj >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: jo...@op... [mailto:joe...@gm...] >>> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 3:47 PM >>> To: ope...@li... >>> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Received response without transaction issue >>> >>> >>> Raymond Nones has prepared some instruction docs in the SIPX wiki. >>> There's a couple of items there about Upper-Reg >>> >>> >>> >> http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/SipXecs-OpenSBC_Setup_Guide_for_Diffe >> >> >>> rent_Call_Scenario >>> >>> Manoj Joshi wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Ok i am arranging that...can u please answer me for the other mail >>>> i sent >>>> for upper registration. >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Joegen E. Baclor [mailto:joe...@gm...] >>>> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 3:22 PM >>>> To: ope...@li... >>>> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Received response without transaction >>>> issue >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> You will have to send in some level five logs for us to look at so I >>>> could tell whats wrong with your provisional response based on >>>> transaction states. >>>> >>>> > > |
|
From: <jo...@op...> - 2008-12-08 01:48:42
|
Ok lets use more descriptive domain naming. Outbound calls flow = UA1 -> SIPX -> OSBC -> Provider-GW UA Dialstring = sip:121...@si... SipX = sipx01.mydomain.com. OpenSBC = osbc01.mydomain.com Provider = gw01.myprovider.com In this sample, The call will reach OpenSBC with the following INVITE INVITE sip:121...@os... SIP/UDP From: "foo"<sip:fo...@si...>;tag=123 To: sip:121...@si... B2BUA-Route = [sip:*mydomain.com*;from=gw01.myprovider.com] sip:gw01.myprovider.com INVITE sip:121...@si... SIP/UDP From: "foo"<sip:fo...@si...>;tag=123 To: sip:121...@si... Now just reverse this process for you egress traffic and you are all set. voice wrote: > Hi Joegen > > [sip:*@yourinternal-domain*;from=provider-domain] > sip:your-internal-domain.com > > provider-domain == Termination > yourinternal-domain == OSBC > your-internal0domain == sipX > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > provider-domain == Origination > yourinternal-domain == sipX > your-internal0domain == OSBC > > Is this what you mean? > > r > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "jo...@op..." <joe...@gm...> > To: "voice" <vo...@ne...>; > <ope...@li...> > Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2008 7:02 PM > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] OSBC <==> sipX Send-Reg-NO > > > >> If you do not need to authenticate with your trunk provider, then you >> not need to use SIP Trunking Module to place your calls. You may simply >> treat your Provider as a normal PSTN Gateway. Get rid of you SIP-Trunk >> config and use B2BUA-Routes instead. I have given an example of a route >> below. >> >> Rewrite-To-URI= true >> Route= [sip:*@yourinternal-domain*;from=provider-domain] >> sip:your-internal-domain.com >> >> - the from parameter in the filter will become the from domain in the >> outbound invite-voice wrote: >> - Rewrite-To-URI will force the To-URI to be rewritten based on the Route. >> >> Joegen >> >>> Hi Joegen >>> >>> In the Sip-trunk config i have selected >>> >>> Send-Reg=NO >>> >>> I am using Broadvox wholesale, which means i have 2 SIP TRUNK'1 >>> >>> One for Termination x.x.x.10 >>> One for Orgination x.x.x.20 >>> >>> I do not need username and password settings in <account> and maybe >>> <Transient*> if i knew what Transient was used for* >>> >>> In light of these facts How should the Sip-Trunk Configure be setup or >>> constructed and what is the bear minimum needed? >>> >>> r >>> >>> >>> >>> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > ---- > >>> SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, >>> > Nevada. > >>> The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to >>> > help > >>> pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at >>> >>> > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.15/1834 - Release Date: >>> > 12/6/2008 4:55 PM > >>> >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.15/1835 - Release Date: 12/7/2008 4:56 PM > > |
|
From: voice <vo...@ne...> - 2008-12-08 01:21:50
|
Hi Joegen No doubling of OSBC: but one of each OSBC and sipX. OSBC and sipX share the same ports osbx:5060 sipx:5060. So inbound open:5060 forward to sipx:5070 Out bound sipX:5070 to open:5060 is this what you are thinking. r ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joegen E. Baclor" <joe...@gm...> To: "voice" <vo...@ne...>; <ope...@li...> Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2008 6:39 PM Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] OSBC<==> sipX > Hi Robert, > > This error will appear if two UDP listeners share the same binding in > the same box. Example: you have two or more OSBC instances running in > the same box using the same listener port. If this is you case you may > change your binfing in the General parameters and set the port > accordingly so that they are different in all you OSBC instance. > > Joegen > > > voice wrote: > > Hi > > > > How do i fix Error ***Address already in use***** in the User Agent Name/Listener address? > > > > r > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- > > SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. > > The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help > > pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at > > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > > opensipstack-devel mailing list > > ope...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > > Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.15/1833 - Release Date: 12/5/2008 7:08 PM > > > > > > |
|
From: <jo...@op...> - 2008-12-08 01:04:36
|
Thanks for the logs. I can see where it MAY go wrong. I will send in a fix shortly. PS: No need to CC my email address when posting. Sending to ope...@li... is enough. I am receiving your emails twice. Joegen Manoj Joshi wrote: > here u go...Log attached. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joegen E. Baclor [mailto:joe...@gm...] > Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2008 3:14 PM > To: ope...@li... > Cc: jo...@op... > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Received response without transaction issue > > > Send in the level 5 log please. > > Manoj Joshi wrote: > >> The issue is ....in case of session progress and connected we do not get >> encrypted response. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Manoj Joshi [mailto:ma...@as...] >> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 5:24 PM >> To: jo...@op...; ope...@li... >> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Received response without transaction issue >> >> >> I did what is mentioned in this link already...Actually registration part >> works fine but when i make call my SIP client doesn't receive any message. >> Besides i think this link refers to old OpenSBC version. In latest version >> there are many new parameters like "Enable backdoor port" and in B2BUA >> > route > >> section "Use Request to Route" etc.. >> >> Regards, >> >> Manoj >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: jo...@op... [mailto:joe...@gm...] >> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 3:47 PM >> To: ope...@li... >> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Received response without transaction issue >> >> >> Raymond Nones has prepared some instruction docs in the SIPX wiki. >> There's a couple of items there about Upper-Reg >> >> >> > http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/SipXecs-OpenSBC_Setup_Guide_for_Diffe > >> rent_Call_Scenario >> >> Manoj Joshi wrote: >> >> >>> Ok i am arranging that...can u please answer me for the other mail i sent >>> for upper registration. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Joegen E. Baclor [mailto:joe...@gm...] >>> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 3:22 PM >>> To: ope...@li... >>> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Received response without transaction issue >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> You will have to send in some level five logs for us to look at so I >>> could tell whats wrong with your provisional response based on >>> transaction states. >>> >>> |
|
From: <jo...@op...> - 2008-12-08 01:02:27
|
If you do not need to authenticate with your trunk provider, then you not need to use SIP Trunking Module to place your calls. You may simply treat your Provider as a normal PSTN Gateway. Get rid of you SIP-Trunk config and use B2BUA-Routes instead. I have given an example of a route below. Rewrite-To-URI= true Route= [sip:*@yourinternal-domain*;from=provider-domain] sip:your-internal-domain.com - the from parameter in the filter will become the from domain in the outbound invite-voice wrote: - Rewrite-To-URI will force the To-URI to be rewritten based on the Route. Joegen > Hi Joegen > > In the Sip-trunk config i have selected > > Send-Reg=NO > > I am using Broadvox wholesale, which means i have 2 SIP TRUNK'1 > > One for Termination x.x.x.10 > One for Orgination x.x.x.20 > > I do not need username and password settings in <account> and maybe > <Transient*> if i knew what Transient was used for* > > In light of these facts How should the Sip-Trunk Configure be setup or > constructed and what is the bear minimum needed? > > r > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. > The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help > pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.15/1834 - Release Date: 12/6/2008 4:55 PM > > |
|
From: Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...> - 2008-12-08 00:41:53
|
You do not have to set anything for the RTP address. As long as OpenSBC is bound to both interfaces, it would generally know which interface to use based on the destination. Joegen voice wrote: > Hi Joegen > > In the General settings Question. > > When OSBC and sipX are on the same box but are associated with 1 of the 2 > internal NICs individually. Should the > > Static RTP Media Address be set to the ip address associated to the sipX? > > r > > > > |
|
From: Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...> - 2008-12-08 00:40:29
|
A WIKI/link button would be a good addition. Good suggestion. I will add this in future releases. Thanks for the suggestion. voice wrote: > Hi Joegen > > Create 4+ blocks of Family of/for simular groupings. As you add more > features/links the list will scroll down forever. The reason for this is > not to make it more contextual pleasing to the eye but maybe to assist those > of us who may want to create help wiki for each individual components in > each family/group. May be easier to add a wiki/help button next to each > selection in the future. The admin menu does a fair job of explaining how > but not why or when to check a flag/box. > > ie: > > I'm using inGate firewall/siparator admin menuing to decipher the various > flag/checkboxs on OSBC but this still leave plenty of EXPERIMENTATION > without really knowing the full impact of unentended consequences or > guidence one flag has over another. > > Just a suggestion > > r > > > > > |
|
From: Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...> - 2008-12-08 00:39:30
|
Hi Robert, This error will appear if two UDP listeners share the same binding in the same box. Example: you have two or more OSBC instances running in the same box using the same listener port. If this is you case you may change your binfing in the General parameters and set the port accordingly so that they are different in all you OSBC instance. Joegen voice wrote: > Hi > > How do i fix Error ***Address already in use***** in the User Agent Name/Listener address? > > r > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. > The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help > pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.15/1833 - Release Date: 12/5/2008 7:08 PM > > |
|
From: voice <vo...@ne...> - 2008-12-06 23:21:55
|
Hi Joegen I have set Sip-Trunk Config Send-Reg=NO In the General Parameters /Enable-Trunk Port States check for ITSP's that need Registration to make phone calls. is this needed when Sip-Trunk Config Send-Reg is set to NO? Can i uncheck General Parameters /Enable-Trunk Port and still use the Sip-Trunk Config? r |
|
From: voice <vo...@ne...> - 2008-12-06 22:10:29
|
Hi Anyone How do i fix Error ***Address already in use***** in the User Agent Name/Listener address? r |
|
From: voice <vo...@ne...> - 2008-12-06 16:25:12
|
Hi Joegen In the General settings Question. When OSBC and sipX are on the same box but are associated with 1 of the 2 internal NICs individually. Should the Static RTP Media Address be set to the ip address associated to the sipX? r |
|
From: voice <vo...@ne...> - 2008-12-06 16:07:57
|
Hi Joegen In the Sip-trunk config i have selected Send-Reg=NO I am using Broadvox wholesale, which means i have 2 SIP TRUNK'1 One for Termination x.x.x.10 One for Orgination x.x.x.20 I do not need username and password settings in <account> and maybe <Transient*> if i knew what Transient was used for* In light of these facts How should the Sip-Trunk Configure be setup or constructed and what is the bear minimum needed? r |
|
From: voice <vo...@ne...> - 2008-12-06 15:09:28
|
Hi Joegen Create 4+ blocks of Family of/for simular groupings. As you add more features/links the list will scroll down forever. The reason for this is not to make it more contextual pleasing to the eye but maybe to assist those of us who may want to create help wiki for each individual components in each family/group. May be easier to add a wiki/help button next to each selection in the future. The admin menu does a fair job of explaining how but not why or when to check a flag/box. ie: I'm using inGate firewall/siparator admin menuing to decipher the various flag/checkboxs on OSBC but this still leave plenty of EXPERIMENTATION without really knowing the full impact of unentended consequences or guidence one flag has over another. Just a suggestion r |
|
From: voice <vo...@ne...> - 2008-12-06 14:47:54
|
Hi How do i fix Error ***Address already in use***** in the User Agent Name/Listener address? r |
|
From: Manoj J. <ma...@as...> - 2008-12-06 09:54:15
|
here u go...Log attached. -----Original Message----- From: Joegen E. Baclor [mailto:joe...@gm...] Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2008 3:14 PM To: ope...@li... Cc: jo...@op... Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Received response without transaction issue Send in the level 5 log please. Manoj Joshi wrote: > The issue is ....in case of session progress and connected we do not get > encrypted response. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Manoj Joshi [mailto:ma...@as...] > Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 5:24 PM > To: jo...@op...; ope...@li... > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Received response without transaction issue > > > I did what is mentioned in this link already...Actually registration part > works fine but when i make call my SIP client doesn't receive any message. > Besides i think this link refers to old OpenSBC version. In latest version > there are many new parameters like "Enable backdoor port" and in B2BUA route > section "Use Request to Route" etc.. > > Regards, > > Manoj > > -----Original Message----- > From: jo...@op... [mailto:joe...@gm...] > Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 3:47 PM > To: ope...@li... > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Received response without transaction issue > > > Raymond Nones has prepared some instruction docs in the SIPX wiki. > There's a couple of items there about Upper-Reg > > http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/SipXecs-OpenSBC_Setup_Guide_for_Diffe > rent_Call_Scenario > > Manoj Joshi wrote: > >> Ok i am arranging that...can u please answer me for the other mail i sent >> for upper registration. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Joegen E. Baclor [mailto:joe...@gm...] >> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 3:22 PM >> To: ope...@li... >> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Received response without transaction issue >> >> >> Hi, >> >> You will have to send in some level five logs for us to look at so I >> could tell whats wrong with your provisional response based on >> transaction states. >> >> Jogen >> >> Manoj Joshi wrote: >> >> >>> Hello Guys, >>> >>> I am having one strange problem with my opensbc setup. in "Session >>> >>> >> progress" >> >> >>> message i am receiving error "Received response without transaction >>> >>> >> issue". >> >> >>> Apart from "session progress" message all other messages are fine and >>> >>> >> being >> >> >>> routing propely. >>> >>> Does anyone faced the same issue. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Manoj >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - >>> > - > >> ---- >> >> >>> SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, >>> >>> >> Nevada. >> >> >>> The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help >>> pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at >>> >>> >>> > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.14/1829 - Release Date: >>> > 12/4/2008 > >> 2:59 PM >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- - >> > -- > >> -- >> SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, >> > Nevada. > >> The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help >> pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at >> >> > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ > >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> >> -- >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG. >> Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.9.12 - Release Date: 11/30/2008 >> > 12:00 > >> AM >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- - >> > ---- > >> SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, >> > Nevada. > >> The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help >> pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at >> >> > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ > >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.14/1829 - Release Date: 12/4/2008 >> > 2:59 PM > >> > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > -- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. > The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help > pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG. > Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.9.12 - Release Date: 11/30/2008 12:00 > AM > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > -- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. > The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help > pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG. > Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.9.12 - Release Date: 11/30/2008 12:00 > AM > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. > The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help > pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.15/1833 - Release Date: 12/5/2008 7:08 PM > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ _______________________________________________ opensipstack-devel mailing list ope...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.9.12/1823 - Release Date: 12/1/2008 7:59 PM |
|
From: Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...> - 2008-12-06 09:44:13
|
Send in the level 5 log please. Manoj Joshi wrote: > The issue is ....in case of session progress and connected we do not get > encrypted response. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Manoj Joshi [mailto:ma...@as...] > Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 5:24 PM > To: jo...@op...; ope...@li... > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Received response without transaction issue > > > I did what is mentioned in this link already...Actually registration part > works fine but when i make call my SIP client doesn't receive any message. > Besides i think this link refers to old OpenSBC version. In latest version > there are many new parameters like "Enable backdoor port" and in B2BUA route > section "Use Request to Route" etc.. > > Regards, > > Manoj > > -----Original Message----- > From: jo...@op... [mailto:joe...@gm...] > Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 3:47 PM > To: ope...@li... > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Received response without transaction issue > > > Raymond Nones has prepared some instruction docs in the SIPX wiki. > There's a couple of items there about Upper-Reg > > http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/SipXecs-OpenSBC_Setup_Guide_for_Diffe > rent_Call_Scenario > > Manoj Joshi wrote: > >> Ok i am arranging that...can u please answer me for the other mail i sent >> for upper registration. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Joegen E. Baclor [mailto:joe...@gm...] >> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 3:22 PM >> To: ope...@li... >> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Received response without transaction issue >> >> >> Hi, >> >> You will have to send in some level five logs for us to look at so I >> could tell whats wrong with your provisional response based on >> transaction states. >> >> Jogen >> >> Manoj Joshi wrote: >> >> >>> Hello Guys, >>> >>> I am having one strange problem with my opensbc setup. in "Session >>> >>> >> progress" >> >> >>> message i am receiving error "Received response without transaction >>> >>> >> issue". >> >> >>> Apart from "session progress" message all other messages are fine and >>> >>> >> being >> >> >>> routing propely. >>> >>> Does anyone faced the same issue. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Manoj >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > - > >> ---- >> >> >>> SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, >>> >>> >> Nevada. >> >> >>> The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help >>> pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at >>> >>> >>> > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.14/1829 - Release Date: >>> > 12/4/2008 > >> 2:59 PM >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > -- > >> -- >> SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, >> > Nevada. > >> The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help >> pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at >> >> > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ > >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> >> -- >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG. >> Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.9.12 - Release Date: 11/30/2008 >> > 12:00 > >> AM >> >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > ---- > >> SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, >> > Nevada. > >> The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help >> pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at >> >> > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ > >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.14/1829 - Release Date: 12/4/2008 >> > 2:59 PM > >> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. > The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help > pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG. > Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.9.12 - Release Date: 11/30/2008 12:00 > AM > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. > The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help > pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG. > Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.9.12 - Release Date: 11/30/2008 12:00 > AM > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. > The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help > pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.15/1833 - Release Date: 12/5/2008 7:08 PM > > |
18 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
