[devel] [PATCH 0/2] Review Request for mds: fix explicit replay callback metadata [#3397]

[Thien H. <thi...@en...>]

Summary: mds: fix explicit replay callback metadata [#3397]
Review request for Ticket(s): 3397
Peer Reviewer(s): Thang, Dat
Pull request to: *** LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE ***
Affected branch(es): develop
Development branch: ticket-3397
Base revision: 8a0101f670badb5743af0ca9d49329ac8bbeb256
Personal repository: git://git.code.sf.net/u/thienhuynh/review

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            n
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          y
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   n

NOTE: Patch(es) contain lines longer than 80 characers

Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------
*** EXPLAIN/COMMENT THE PATCH SERIES HERE ***

revision 7291c7ffcb93b4474cd4cf9f840e0983392a1806
Author: Thien Minh Huynh <thi...@en...>
Date:   Tue, 14 Apr 2026 12:16:21 +0200

mds: add test case for explicit replay [#3397]



revision 65308e95292c8c47967f7c6478961341968072bb
Author: Thien Minh Huynh <thi...@en...>
Date:   Mon, 13 Apr 2026 12:03:25 +0200

mds: fix explicit replay callback metadata [#3397]



Complete diffstat:
------------------
 src/mds/apitest/mdstipc_api.c | 171 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 src/mds/mds_c_db.c            |  10 ++-
 2 files changed, 180 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
N/A

Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
N/A

Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
ACK from reviewer

Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      y          y
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.gitconfig file (i.e. user.name, user.email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Any opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Company. Emails are susceptible to interference. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this message in error, do not open any attachments but please notify the Endava Service Desk on (+44 (0)870 423 0187), and delete this message from your system. The sender accepts no responsibility for information, errors or omissions in this email, or for its use or misuse, or for any act committed or omitted in connection with this communication. If in doubt, please verify the authenticity of the contents with the sender. Please rely on your own virus checkers as no responsibility is taken by the sender for any damage rising out of any bug or virus infection.

Endava plc is a company registered in England under company number 5722669 whose registered office is at 125 Old Broad Street, London, EC2N 1AR, United Kingdom. Endava plc is the Endava group holding company and does not provide any services to clients. Each of Endava plc and its subsidiaries is a separate legal entity and has no liability for another such entity's acts or omissions.