|
From: Benjamin H. <zo...@gm...> - 2022-07-28 20:56:23
|
Le jeu. 28 juil. 2022 à 16:14, Maximin COSTE <max...@gm...> a écrit : > Hi, > > >Sysfs is slow (and deprecated by the kernel guys), gpiod is way faster. > > Surprisingly, the flash duration is the same (+/1 sec) for gpiod and sysfs > here ! > > >I think there is a gpiod cable in openocd now, but i have not tested it > yet. > > My apologies if this is a stupid but what is a "cable" in this context ? > I use gpiod in my configuration file using the following adapter command: > "adapter driver linuxgpiod" > Adapter sorry, cable is for urjtag :-) > Best regards, > > -- > Maximin COSTE > > > Le jeu. 28 juil. 2022 à 16:06, Benjamin Henrion <zo...@gm...> a > écrit : > >> Le jeu. 28 juil. 2022 à 14:42, Maximin COSTE <max...@gm...> a >> écrit : >> >>> Hi everybody, >>> >>> I was previously using openocd on a RPI Zero 1/2 to flash an STM32F412 >>> using SWD protocol. >>> The whole flashing operation takes around 5 to 6 seconds which is fine. >>> My only constraint is that operation takes no more than those 5 to 6 >>> seconds (it is >>> because the STM32F4 sends keep-alive frames via CAN to the main battery. >>> If there is >>> no message received in the last ~7 sec, the battery shutdown and so does >>> the entiere >>> system). >>> >>> Due to the current shortage of RPI boards, I switched to Radxa Pi Zero >>> (https://wiki.radxa.com/Zero) with an AMLogic S905Y2 inside. >>> I have tried to use sysfs and gpiod (in my understanding, there are >>> pretty much the >>> same thing, and gpiod is newer ?) and despite thoses errors messages: >>> >> >> Sysfs is slow (and deprecated by the kernel guys), gpiod is way faster. >> >> >>> > Error: Translation from khz to adapter speed not implemented >>> (maybe it is because of the use of such "generic" layer) >>> >>> > Error executing event reset-start on target stm32f4x.cpu: >>> (here I am not sure what is going on...) >>> >>> it goes to the end, and flash is "correctly" done ! >>> >>> My only (but big !) concern is that with sysfs or gpiod, the flashing >>> process takes around >>> 9-10sec and as specified in the beginning of this message, this is too >>> much, and >>> the system battery goes timeout with this duration... >>> >>> It is my understanding that the BCM2835gpio driver for OpenOCD uses >>> specific directs >>> RAM access to achieve the speed I mesured in my usage (5-6 seconds). >>> It looks like nothing comparable is available for AMLogic S905Y2/ Radxa >>> Pi ? >>> I might have no searched deep enough, or in the right place. >>> If nothing is available, how do you see this ? Should it be straight >>> forward to >>> implement ? Can I get at least the same performances I had with the >>> BCM2835gpio driver ? >>> >> >> I think there is a gpiod cable in openocd now, but i have not tested it >> yet. >> >> Best, >> >> >> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> -- >>> Maximin COSTE >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenOCD-user mailing list >>> Ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-user >>> >> _______________________________________________ > OpenOCD-user mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-user > |