|
From: Tim N. <ti...@si...> - 2016-05-25 22:06:01
|
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Andreas Färber <afa...@su...> wrote: > Am 25.05.2016 um 02:17 schrieb Tim Newsome: > > I notice that eg. read_memory() takes address as a uint32_t. Does > > OpenOCD support 64-bit address spaces? Are there plans to support it? > > See for example: http://openocd.zylin.com/#/c/1200/ What I'm getting from that is that it's not going to happen without a serious push, and some desire on the maintainers' part to get it included. I'll worry about it when I have a 64-bit target, but I am a bit concerned about this. Thank you, Tim > > > Regards, > Andreas > > -- > SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany > GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton > HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who > bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM > restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the > apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data > untouched! > https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j > _______________________________________________ > OpenOCD-devel mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel > |