|
From: David B. <da...@pa...> - 2009-11-17 19:28:24
|
On Tuesday 17 November 2009, Michael Bruck wrote: > >> A good opportunity for the latter would be when > >> Tcl objects are added and these functions become methods of target > >> objects. > > > > That doesn't seem like such a good opportunity; it's off in the vague > > future. I'd rather just prevent trivially obvious wrongness from > > getting merged in the first place. > > > It is functional as it is and can be of use to users. It may be a > problem in multi-core systems, but that is merely a restriction and > doesn't make it unusable. Nothing prevents you from providing a patch > that includes the restructuring that you want. Or following standard patch review+merge policies and suggesting that the original submitter resolve that issue before it's merged. Because that *is* a standard process. Post a patch you'd like to see merged ... accept feedback ... resubmit ... repeat till merged. |