|
From: David B. <da...@pa...> - 2009-11-03 21:39:12
|
On Tuesday 03 November 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > Should we include this fix for 0.3? Only if it's updated to comment that it *still* makes an unwise assumption about target clock rate. If it's running with a 32 KHz clock, will that timeout be long enough? How about 8 KHz? Or lower? :) Testing confirmation needed too. |