|
From: Ø. H. <oyv...@zy...> - 2008-02-29 15:53:42
|
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Uwe Hermann <uw...@he...> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 04:03:25PM +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > > > > The rest of the source is in > > > > the ecosflash folder. > > > > > > OK, so that code is written by you and GPL'd, which is fine. Is _all_ > > > the rest of the code which is linked in the binaries (ELF files) GPL'd > > > too? > > > > Right. So I should make those files not GPL, but GPL w/exception > > lest eCos would have to be GPL'd too? > > I think this is a misunderstanding. I didn't want to suggest to switch > to the eCos license (although that's not a problem either). The alternative would be to distribute the eCos source code w/OpenOCD. Yuk! > > What I want to make sure is that the ELF files consist of 100% free > software, eCos is 100% free as in free speech + it's free as in free beer :-) > i.e. that no binary-only, closed-source stuff is linked into > those binaries; that would be a problem. > > If the eCos libs (and other objects/code, if any) you linked into the > ELF files are all GPL'd or under the eCos license (which is > GPL+exception), then everything is fine. It is. > > > > > Uwe. > -- > http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de > http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org > -- Øyvind Harboe http://www.zylin.com - eCos ARM & FPGA developer kit |