Re: [Openocd-development] Remove arm11 warnings

[Michael B. <mb...@di...>]

Uwe Hermann wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 02:07:07PM +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>>>  > Some clear guidelines on *sensible* use of C/C++ that
>>>  > still allows for embedded implementations(ARM7 type CPUs w/plenty
>>>  > RAM) + a plan that isn't disruptive backed by the willing and
>>>  > ableness to do the work gets my blessing.
>>>
>>>  Just switching to the C++ compiler without re-programming would be a
>>>  start. (The function pointer initialization would need to be converted
>>>  back to standard language as the extension is not available in G++).
>>>  That would allow some gradual transition of individual bits of code.
>> I think the community will scream murder if we try to slip in C++  here...
> 
> Murder!!!1
> 
> Seriously though, please stick with ANSI C.
> 
>  
> Thanks, Uwe.


ISO C99 allows for bool.

ANSI C on the other hand would not compile a single file of this project:

make clean; make CFLAGS+=-ansi CFLAGS+=-pedantic



Michael