|
From: Dominic R. <Dom...@gm...> - 2008-01-04 19:19:54
|
On Friday 04 January 2008 19:14:16 Øyvind Harboe wrote: > Michael helped tested this and it now passes basic smoketests. > > Is there a consensus that this should be committed once it > passes testing? I haven't had a chance to look at the changes in detail, but in general yes. I like the idea of removing the check_value/mask, and in_handler is the best place for this functionality. > Reminder: it is an important step in the direction of letting OpenOCD > products implement the entire jtag_xxx() layer in hw+sw, which allows a > much greater degree of innovation w.r.t. implementations > of hardware + sw acceleration. > > The current jtag_xxx() functions and the drivers will then be > a reference implementation of the jtag_xxx() layer. > > http://www.zylin.com/removecheckmaskerror8.txt > > > (Repost w/link to patch, maximum 40kByte posts...) I've just accepted your original message, and raised the limit to 100k. |