Re: [Openocd-development] synthesize in_check_mask/value and error handler using in_handler

[Dominic R. <Dom...@gm...>]

On Friday 04 January 2008 19:14:16 Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> Michael helped tested this and it now passes basic smoketests.
>
> Is there a consensus that this should be committed once it
> passes testing?

I haven't had a chance to look at the changes in detail, but in general yes. I 
like the idea of removing the check_value/mask, and in_handler is the best 
place for this functionality.

> Reminder: it is an important step in the direction of letting OpenOCD
> products implement the entire jtag_xxx() layer in hw+sw, which allows a
> much greater degree of innovation w.r.t. implementations
> of hardware + sw acceleration.
>
> The current jtag_xxx() functions and the drivers will then be
> a reference implementation of the jtag_xxx() layer.
>
> http://www.zylin.com/removecheckmaskerror8.txt
>
>
> (Repost w/link to patch, maximum 40kByte posts...)

I've just accepted your original message, and raised the limit to 100k.