From: Greg P. <gre...@in...> - 2002-05-24 15:49:42
|
Ian, I appreciate the info. This is what I did and this is what I got. I edited the following files: capsd-configuration - max-suspect-thread-pool-size & max-rescan-thread-po= ol-size both are set to 1 collected-configuration - collectd-configuration threads =3D 1 poller-configuration - poller-configuration threads=3D"1" I rebooted the host ( 1 Ghz, 256 RAM, REdhat v7.2 ) Go get coffee... run> ps -ef|grep java | wc -1 =3D 82 run>free total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 253548 250476 3072 928 5580 153200 -/+ buffers/cache: 91696 161852 Swap: 522104 31968 490136 run> top PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND 1350 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:14 java 1437 root 12 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 1438 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.5 19.7 0:17 java 1439 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 1440 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 1441 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 R N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 1442 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 1443 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 1444 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 1445 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:31 java 1482 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 1483 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 1519 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 1520 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 1521 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 1522 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 1523 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 1644 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 1648 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 1661 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 1664 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 1665 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 1668 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 2812 root 12 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 2817 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 2819 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 2820 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 2821 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 2822 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 2823 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 2824 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 2825 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 2826 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 2827 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 2828 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 2829 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 2830 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 2831 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 2832 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 2833 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 2834 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 2835 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 2836 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:01 java 2837 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 2838 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 D N 6.6 19.7 0:22 java 2839 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 2840 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 2842 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 2877 root 13 5 64960 48M 11432 S N 0.0 19.7 0:00 java 1043 root 9 0 47272 36M 22200 S 0.0 14.7 0:09 java 1086 root 8 0 47272 36M 22200 S 0.0 14.7 0:00 java 1087 root 9 0 47272 36M 22200 S 0.0 14.7 0:16 java 1090 root 9 0 47272 36M 22200 S 0.0 14.7 0:00 java 1091 root 9 0 47272 36M 22200 S 0.0 14.7 0:00 java 1110 root 9 0 47272 36M 22200 R 0.0 14.7 0:00 java 1111 root 9 0 47272 36M 22200 S 0.0 14.7 0:00 java 1112 root 9 0 47272 36M 22200 S 0.0 14.7 0:00 java 1113 root 9 0 47272 36M 22200 S 0.0 14.7 0:02 java 1436 root 9 0 47272 36M 22200 S 0.0 14.7 0:00 java ... many more ... I've reloaded the box twice and the same thing happens. I'm overrun with j= ava processes and it brings the machine to its knees. Not sure what I did = wrong. Any thoughts appreciated. Greg Message: 6 Subject: Re: [opennms-discuss] Process throttling? From: Ian Wallace <iwa...@co...> To: Discuss OpenNMS <di...@op...> Date: 23 May 2002 09:30:30 -0600 Reply-To: di...@op... Greg - I just tuned my OpenNMS setup down to use one thread for discovery, and one for polling (one for the actual polling and one for rescans ...) With this tuned down I get approximately 48 procs in the filesystem ... and lots of free memory on a machine with 256MB (I'm using ps -ef | grep java | wc -l to find out ... I have Tomcat turned off at the moment and nothing else running other then postgresql). Is this what you see? cheers ian |