Re: [Openbts-discuss] [PATCH 2/3] uhd: Update B200 timing compensation for UHD 3.9.0

[Ralph A. S. d. <ra...@sc...>]

"Something" still requires the sendLPF_961.h and rcvLPF_651.h files. When they are restored the build runs through. I don't have the hardware with me, so I earliest can check this evening if it really works.


Ralph.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ralph A. Schmid, dk5ras [mailto:ra...@sc...] 
Sent: Thursday, November 5, 2015 13:44
To: 'Michael Iedema'
Cc: 'OpenBTS Discuss'
Subject: Re: [Openbts-discuss] [PATCH 2/3] uhd: Update B200 timing compensation for UHD 3.9.0

Something seems broken. The build script is able to make a SDR1 version of OpenBTS, but not a B210 version. When trying to build OpenBTS directly, this is the output: 

make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/ras/dev/openbts/doc'
Making all in Transceiver52M
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/ras/dev/openbts/Transceiver52M'
/bin/bash ../libtool  --tag=CXX   --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..   -D'REPO_REV="fdf71fb552 CommonLibs:11d8baa826"' -I../apps -I../CommonLibs -I../Control -I../GSM -I../GSMShare -I../GPRS -I../SGSNGGSN -I../SIP -I../SMS -I../TRXManager -I../Globals -I../CLI -I../Peering -I../NodeManager -I../NodeManager/JsonBox-0.4.3/include -I../Scanning -I/usr/local/include     -g -O2 -Wall -pthread -ldl -rdynamic -DTIMESTAMP_ISO=`date +'"%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S"'`  -MT sigProcLib.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/sigProcLib.Tpo -c -o sigProcLib.lo sigProcLib.cpp
libtool: compile:  g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. "-DREPO_REV=\"fdf71fb552 CommonLibs:11d8baa826\"" -I../apps -I../CommonLibs -I../Control -I../GSM -I../GSMShare -I../GPRS -I../SGSNGGSN -I../SIP -I../SMS -I../TRXManager -I../Globals -I../CLI -I../Peering -I../NodeManager -I../NodeManager/JsonBox-0.4.3/include -I../Scanning -I/usr/local/include -g -O2 -Wall -pthread -ldl -rdynamic -DTIMESTAMP_ISO=\"2015-11-05T13:42:35\" -MT sigProcLib.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/sigProcLib.Tpo -c sigProcLib.cpp  -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/sigProcLib.o
sigProcLib.cpp:27:25: fatal error: sendLPF_961.h: No such file or directory  #include "sendLPF_961.h"
                         ^
compilation terminated.
make[2]: *** [sigProcLib.lo] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/ras/dev/openbts/Transceiver52M'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ras/dev/openbts'
make: *** [all] Error 2
ras@ubuntu:~/dev/openbts$


Ralph.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Iedema [mailto:mic...@ra...]
> Sent: Thursday, 05 November, 2015 10:01
> To: Ralph A. Schmid, dk5ras
> Cc: Tom Tsou; OpenBTS Discuss
> Subject: Re: [Openbts-discuss] [PATCH 2/3] uhd: Update B200 timing 
> compensation for UHD 3.9.0
> 
> They’ve been committed now, sorry for the delay.
> 
> Tom had the patches to me right away but I was caught up in a small 
> fire yesterday.
> 
> Regards,
> -Michael
> 
> 
> 
> > On 05 Nov 2015, at 08:25, Ralph A. Schmid, dk5ras <ra...@sc...>
> wrote:
> >
> > Still not yet released?
> >
> > I tried applying the patches manually, but as always I have problems 
> > to get them accepted, the error messages are not my world, I simply 
> > have to spend more time on trying to understand this :/
> >
> > With best regards
> >
> > Ralph.
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Michael Iedema [mailto:mic...@ra...]
> >> Sent: Monday, 02 November, 2015 19:09
> >> To: Tom Tsou
> >> Cc: Ralph A. Schmid, dk5ras; OpenBTS Discuss
> >> Subject: Re: [Openbts-discuss] [PATCH 2/3] uhd: Update B200 timing 
> >> compensation for UHD 3.9.0
> >>
> >> Hi Tom,
> >>
> >> For some reason, I’ve only received part 2 of this latest version.
> >> Could you please send me the three pieces directly and I’ll get 
> >> them
> committed.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >> -Michael
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 02 Nov 2015, at 18:56, Tom Tsou <tom...@et...> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:07 AM, Ralph A. Schmid, dk5ras 
> >>> <ra...@sc...> wrote:
> >>>> It is not yet in the repo?!
> >>>
> >>> This is the second version of the patch. The first one was 
> >>> submitted months ago. There was some confusion on the prior 
> >>> version, so I can understand why it never went in. The current 
> >>> patch really does need to get merged though.
> >>>
> >>> In the meantime, OpenBTS users with B200's should build against 
> >>> UHD
> >>> 3.8.5 or use the alternate transceiver OsmoTRX.
> >>>
> >>> http://openbsc.osmocom.org/trac/wiki/OsmoTRX
> >>>
> >>> -TT
> >
> >



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Openbts-discuss mailing list
Ope...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbts-discuss