From: David B. <da...@ra...> - 2012-07-14 16:18:03
|
Our experience is that when the base clock phase noise is improved, the guard period envelope will also improve. On Jul 14, 2012, at 1:04 AM, Sylvain Munaut wrote: > Hi, > >> Probably a stupid question, but could we just add one more guard bit >> to the beginning instead of "stealing" bits from the end? > > Not really ... the code will call modulateBurst either with 0 guard > bits for generating various reference waveforms. Or with 8/9 guard > bits depending on the timeslot to respect the GSM specs of 8.25 guard > bits between burst, you can't just add new guard bits without > violating the GSM timing which would be much worse than violating the > rise time during the tail bits. > > Doing it the way I do the correct GSM framing is respected but TX/RX > are shifted a bit which is not ideal and would need to be compensated > for somewhere. > > Cheers, > > Sylvain > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Openbts-discuss mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbts-discuss David A. Burgess, CEO Range Networks, Inc. San Francisco cell +1 707 208 2622 ____________________________________________ Cellular networks made simple and affordable. http://www.rangenetworks.com ____________________________________________ |