From: Harvind S. <hs...@ke...> - 2011-10-27 22:17:19
|
Yup. Rev. 2342 was me. Didn't realize people would start playing with it so soon. Sylvain, if you have the patch that select b/w single-board and two boards, then let's put that in ASAP. On Oct 27, 2011, at 1:04 AM, Kurtis Heimerl wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 1:00 AM, Sylvain Munaut <24...@gm...> wrote: >>> I'm using rev 2398, which is pretty far ahead of that commit. >> >> "Pretty far ahead" ??? I see only 3 commits after this one (that are >> affecting the openbts/ subtree). And none of those change Tranceiver. > > Heh, sure. Fair point, I was just going by rev numbers. > >> >>> I'm running two daughter boards anyhow. >> >> Doesn't matter, that commit switches to single board _only_, it's >> _not_ an option. > > Really? So... this means that harvind pushed a non-working change > into the repository? Why do we need single board only? > > Ok, followup question: Does anyone have the tip of the branch running > right now? If not,I guess I should try rolling back to before that > patch... > >> >> Cheers, >> >> Sylvain >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the > demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly. > Take a complimentary Learning@Cisco Self-Assessment and learn > about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Openbts-discuss mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbts-discuss |