|
From: David A. B. <dbu...@jc...> - 2011-06-13 14:55:45
|
This is all very easy to say when you are not one of the ones who will be called into court when some fool accidentally man-in-the-middles an SOS call because he was too lazy to do it right. It is unethical to create a threat to public safety simply because you are lazy and it is unethical to support that kind of behavior. On Jun 13, 2011, at 2:07 AM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) wrote: > Hi all, > > the DISCLAIMER that something could NOT be done starts getting somehow > annoying and such aggressive approach it's imho not positive for the > overall project. > > Put a standard disclaimer in the signature and that's it. > > I really don't see why people cannot just discuss about using their > OpenBTS for testing like they want. > > Let's write a standard disclaimer and leave the freedom. > Probably by lowering the TX power to something really low (50mw?) that > would not hook any phones far more than 5meters, any users would be able > to do whatever testing they want, on whatever frequencies without > disturbing any other phones. > > I mean, a simple disclaimer guide that explain how to do WHATEVER you > want but in safe environment, without 'hijacking' other phones and > without 'hijacking' other networks due to reduced power and specific > safe configuration. > > Sounds like an alternative to a semi-fascist approach like saying to ban > people out from the list if they speak about stuff? > > I really dislike censorship and an approach to block people from > discussing about any stuff. > > In theory here we should also be free to discuss about hijacking other > people phone networks, i know at least 4 small companies that play with > OpenBTS to make a GSM IMSI catcher + interception system for law > enforcement use. > > That's something that exists, it's the real world, why don't discuss > about it? > > Now feel free to kick-me out from the mailing lists because i am > discussing about "forbidden topic" . > > Fabio |