|
From: abhinav a. <a.a...@gm...> - 2011-06-11 03:33:56
|
I have also tested Kal on USRP2 for the non 52Mhz transceiver. It gave pretty accurate results !!! On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Thomas Tsou <tt...@vt...> wrote: > 2011/6/10 Alexander Chemeris <ale...@gm...>: > > I think Kal is not ported to non 52 MHz configuration and doesn't work > > with USRP2 - that's why you see this error about incorrect frequency. > > Correct me if I'm wrong. > > I did a quick port to UHD - the necessary changes were minimal - when > working with the usrp2 about nine months ago. The usrp2 doesn't have a > reconfigurable clock rate and the sample rate for UHD devices can be > set without specifying decimation. 52MHz is the default so that's what > the usrp2 tries to use. > > http://ttsou.github.com/kalibrate-uhd/ > > I can still detect signals, though I'm not entirely sure if and to > what degree the sample rate offset has on accuracy. > > Thomas > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content > authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image > Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Openbts-discuss mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbts-discuss > |