Re: [Oorexx-devel] HTML Version of documentation on build machine - one more question

[Rick M. <obj...@gm...>]

Indeed, that's why I fired off that build in the first place...to make sure
I didn't screw anything up :-)

Rick

On 9/26/07, Mark Miesfeld <mie...@gm...> wrote:
>
> It may be that the build for it failed.  You can browse the log to see
> if that is the case.
>
> On 9/26/07, Lee Peedin <le...@sa...> wrote:
> > I noticed that the build that Rick pointed to does not have the
> rexxref.  Is that because it hadn't
> > changed since the previous build (806)?
> >
> > Lee
> >
> > Lee Peedin wrote:
> > > Thanks Rick & David for the explanation - had not even noticed there
> was a different build for the
> > > docs.  In fact I hadn't looked since the pdf files are included with
> the interpreter build.
> > >
> > > Lee
> > >
> > > Rick McGuire wrote:
> > >> I think you need to request a build of the docs, not the interpreter.
> > >> Here's the latest version:
> > >>
> > >> http://build.oorexx.org/builds/docs/814/
> > >>
> >
> >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Oorexx-devel mailing list
> > Oor...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
> >
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oor...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>