From: Michael L. <ml...@lu...> - 2005-08-19 15:45:00
|
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:30:29 -0500, David Ashley wrote: >So I have been trying to substitute the standard MS Visual C++ compiler >and linker for GCC under CygWin. Thus I gather the intent is to have ooRexx inside the CygWin environment and not so much the use of GCC as a replacement for MSCPP, correct? If you had been simply trying to use GCC on Windows then MinGW might have been the direction you were going? (At least from memory I remember that project being straight up GCC for Windows.) Is CygWin really that widely used for real applications / implementations? I know, get the ooRexx flag flying as many places as we can... still, fighting with compilers is not generally considered "leisure time"! ;-) Thanks for the update... sounds like MSCPP better not go away anytime soon! Michael |