From: Rick M. <obj...@gm...> - 2012-08-25 00:54:11
|
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Jeremy Nicoll - ml sourceforge < jn....@le...> wrote: > Rick McGuire <obj...@gm...> wrote: > > >Do Over is defined as operating on a snapshot of the collection, so this > is > >a requirement for the instruction. > > Do you mean because the code inside the do loop could change the collection > so it needs the separate copy made at the start to control the loop? > Yes, that's what I mean. > > I can understand that, but it still seems very inefficient. > Nonetheless, that is how it is defined. > > -- > Jeremy Nicoll - my opinions are my own > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oor...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > |