[Oorexx-bugs] [ oorexx-Bugs-2951893 ] Failure in SysStemDelete

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Bugs item #2951893, was opened at 2010-02-15 00:11
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by miesfeld
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684730&aid=2951893&group_id=119701

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: External Functions
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Bob Martin (rvmartin)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Failure in SysStemDelete

Initial Comment:
SysStemDelete deletes the nominated record and moves the following records up one, but it does not decrease the record count.

This is in 64-bit version only.  OK in 32-bit ooRexx.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Miesfeld (miesfeld)
Date: 2010-03-27 20:17

Message:
Ah, shoot - I was just on a Linux today and I forgot to test this.

Bob, the ooRexx 4.0.1 beta is now available and this should be fixed in
that.  Could you test the beta and see if this is still a problem.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Miesfeld (miesfeld)
Date: 2010-02-15 09:41

Message:
Oh, he says sheepishly, I didn't look closely enough at the commit.  ;-(  
Plus, I only looked at the current code, which is of course the replacement
code.

It should be fixed, I'll verify that today.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rick McGuire (bigrixx)
Date: 2010-02-15 09:36

Message:
I'm not sure why you say that....my earlier fix completely replaced all of
the SysStemDelete code.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Miesfeld (miesfeld)
Date: 2010-02-15 09:33

Message:
Rick, yeah I'll test it, as soon as I can boot up a Linux system.  Should
be today.

I had glanced at the code, and it didn't look to me like the other fix you
did would effect SysStemDelete().  I could easily be wrong though.  <grin>

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rick McGuire (bigrixx)
Date: 2010-02-15 08:07

Message:
Mark, could you verify that this is working correctly on your 64-bit linux
system?  I suspect this should be working correctly now. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684730&aid=2951893&group_id=119701