[Oorexx-bugs] [ oorexx-Bugs-2820937 ] Traceback incorrect

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Bugs item #2820937, was opened at 2009-07-13 16:06
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bigrixx
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684730&aid=2820937&group_id=119701

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
>Category: Interpreter
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Mark Gaubatz (mgaubatz)
>Assigned to: Rick McGuire (bigrixx)
Summary: Traceback incorrect

Initial Comment:
With and without signal on syntax and raise propagate in 4.0 RC 1, traceback starts with use strict instruction (or raise instruction if using raise). Expected is that traceback starts at the line number indicated by the syntax error message.

call foo
call bar

::routine foo
signal on syntax
use strict arg fn
return

syntax:
raise propagate

::routine bar
use strict fn
return

Example results from call to foo:
   111 *-* use strict arg fn
    36 *-* rc = foo(/*fn*/)
    25 *-* return .program~new~make("foo")
REX0040E: Error 40 running /home/mark/foo.rex line 36:  Incorrect call to routine
REX0374E: Error 40.3:  Not enough arguments in invocation of FOO; minimum expected is 1

Example results from call to bar:
   111 *-* use strict arg fn
    36 *-* rc = bar(/*fn*/)
    25 *-* return .program~new~make("bar")
REX0040E: Error 40 running /home/mark/bar.rex line 111:  Incorrect call to routine
REX0374E: Error 40.3:  Not enough arguments in invocation of BAR; minimum expected is 1



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Rick McGuire (bigrixx)
Date: 2009-07-13 16:59

Message:
This is working exactly the way it was intended.  The raise propagate
raises a new condition at the point of the caller, so the line number is
reported correctly.  The traceback information from the earlier levels is
maintained because you've asked for this to be propagated. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: TheDavidFactor (darthapache)
Date: 2009-07-13 16:34

Message:
While I find this issue some what confusing as well, this should be an RFE
not a Bug because this behavior is consistent with ooRexx 3.2 (and I assume
older versions as well)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684730&aid=2820937&group_id=119701