From: Moritz H. <ant...@gm...> - 2008-09-22 15:39:54
|
Rick McGuire wrote: > I'd like to create a new version of the API (and expose it in the > RxQueue() function and the RexxQueue class) that behaves the way > people generally want this to work, which is to make sure that the > queue exists. This is fairly easy to do....the biggest hang up is > what to call the operation? The best I've come up with so far is > RexxOpenQueue(), but it's not create an open operation. > RexxGetQueue() might also work, but a Get implies something is > returned, which is not really the case. I'd vote for RexxOpenQueue() as it is short and may also include the process of creating the queue. Opening files also creates them, thus I think both opening and creating a queue can be covered by 'open'. The old functionality was really strange and counter intuitive, I'm glad your're reworking this part! Moritz -- Moritz Hoffmann http://antiguru.de/ |