Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx RR Diagrams Change

[Rick M. <obj...@gm...>]

The purpose of this exercise is to get rid of the railroad tracks.

Rick

On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 9:21 AM, John R bodoh <joh...@in...> wrote:
> Why not:
>
>
>
>>>---myftpobj~ftpsetmode(---+---Passive---+---)-----------à<
>
>                             |             |
>
>                             +---Active----+
>
>
>
> John
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: David Ashley [mailto:da...@us...]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 4:38 PM
> To: oor...@li...
> Subject: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx RR Diagrams Change
>
>
>
> All -
>
> I have begun experimenting with new styles for the ooRexx syntax diagrams.
> My first stab at this is located at
>
> http://build.oorexx.org/builds/release_candidates/rxftp.pdf
>
> This style has some drawbacks, especially in the area of multiple choices
> for a single method/function argument. See the FtpSetMode method for an
> example of this problem. This method argument has only two possibilities but
> we have other examples where we have as many as seven possibilities. This
> might become onerous.
>
> Anyway, let me know what you think. All comment are welcome. We obviously
> want a consensus on this topic before we begin wholesale changes to the
> documentation.
>
> Thanks,
> W. David Ashley
> IBM Systems and Technology Group Lab Services
> Open Object Rexx Team
> Mobile Phone: 512-289-7506
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
> prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oor...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>
>