Re: [Oorexx-devel] The BEEP.testGroup

[Rick M. <obj...@gm...>]

I changed my mind.  Switching to the generic 88 messages seemed the
more consistent thing to use.

Rick

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Mark Miesfeld <mie...@gm...> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Rick McGuire <obj...@gm...> wrote:
>> Although I see one problem with the message....it should not be saying
>> "argument in METHOD".  I think this is just a problem with the message
>> text.
>
> Yeah, although I think it might be a problem with the code.  Shouldn't
> it be one of the 88 codes, invalid argument?
>
> As I recall you added those to be generic for both methods and routines.
>
> I won't change the test case until I know what the correct code is
> suppossed to be.
>
> --
> Mark Miesfeld
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
> It's the best place to buy or sell services for
> just about anything Open Source.
> http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oor...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>