From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-10-03 12:39:16
|
Feature Requests item #1526371, was opened at 2006-07-21 05:43 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by bigrixx You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684733&aid=1526371&group_id=119701 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Documentation Group: v3.2.0 >Status: Pending Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Rick McGuire (bigrixx) Assigned to: David Ashley (wdashley) Summary: Rework the documentation of the set methods Initial Comment: The collection classes do not individually document that they implement the set methods (UNION, INTERSECTION, etc.). It would be more usable if the documentation for each collection class could stand alone so people can understand what methods a given class implements without having to dig through other sections. Also, the section on the set methods never shows the examples using Rexx syntax, so it isn't always clear which object is the message receiver. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David Ashley (wdashley) Date: 2007-07-08 22:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931756 Originator: NO Fixed for version 3.2.0. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684733&aid=1526371&group_id=119701 |