Just a heads up about this patch, there exists a potential name collision between sockgethostname and sockgethostbyname. I am not sure if my fix will work.
SockGetHostByName
<indexterm><primary>SockGetHostName</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm>
<primary>function</primary>
<secondary>SockGetHostByName</secondary>
</indexterm>
SockGetHostByName
<indexterm><primary>SockGetHostByName</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm>
<primary>function</primary>
<secondary>SockGetHostByName</secondary>
</indexterm>
The primary and secondary indexterms are now the same (with my change). Not sure if this is ok.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Ah, sorry, I thought you were talking about the code patch...That seems strange usage there. I think maybe both should use GetHostName as the primary, then have GetHostName and GetHostByName as the appropriate secondaries so both variants are shown. Note also you've duplicated the section ids, which will be a small problem.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
I'm not sure I understand why there is a problem.
Maybe this will help:
Ah, sorry, I thought you were talking about the code patch...That seems strange usage there. I think maybe both should use GetHostName as the primary, then have GetHostName and GetHostByName as the appropriate secondaries so both variants are shown. Note also you've duplicated the section ids, which will be a small problem.
"rxsock.sgml.2.patch" should work considering what you said.
Added getHostByName method with revision [r11151]
Related
Commit: [r11151]