Remove leading and trailing tags option not working

The free computer aided translation (CAT) tool for professionals

Brought to you by: alex73, amake, brandelune, briac_pilpre, and 10 others

#582 Remove leading and trailing tags option not working

Milestone: 3.0

Status: closed-fixed

Owner: Alex Buloichik

Labels: File filters (49)

Priority: 5

Updated: 2013-06-12

Created: 2013-04-28

Creator: Yu Tang

Private: No

See attachments in action.
The project has been completed by OmegaT 2.6.
But when I open it by OmegaT 3.0.0, it turned into incomplete.
Number of total segments is on the increase and also remaining segments too.
I cheked file filters options, but they remain default values.
How to keep a finished project be intact in OmegaT 3.0?

1 Attachments

test-project.zip

Discussion

Yu Tang - 2013-04-28

A screenshot in diff by WinMerge.

diff-stats.png

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Didier Briel - 2013-04-29

The omegat folder of your project does not contain segmentation.conf and filters.xml, making it very difficult to analyse something.

Can you repost a project with those files?

Didier

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Didier Briel - 2013-04-29

status: open --> pending
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Yu Tang - 2013-04-29

Sorry for missing files.
Re-post.

test-project.zip

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Didier Briel - 2013-04-29

summary: 3.0 Segmentation is incompatible with previous version --> Remove leading and trailing tags option not working

status: pending --> open

assigned_to: Alex Buloichik
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Didier Briel - 2013-04-29

Thank you for the files.

Now that I have the options, it seems that it's not a segmentation issue, but that the option Remove leading and trailing tags is not working as it should.

I have changed the title accordingly.

Didier

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Didier Briel - 2013-05-09

status: open --> open-fixed
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Didier Briel - 2013-05-09

Fixed in SVN (/trunk) for the XML filters.

The behaviour still has to be fixed in the HTML filter.

Didier

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Didier Briel - 2013-05-10

The HTML filter is fixed, too.

Didier

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Didier Briel - 2013-05-10

labels: Application --> File filters
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Didier Briel - 2013-05-13

status: open-fixed --> closed-fixed
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Didier Briel - 2013-05-13

Fixed in the released version 3.0.1.

Didier

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Martin Fleurke - 2013-06-11

There still is an incompatibility between 2.6 and 3.1, which seems to be related to   handling. 3.1 strips tags better when there are leading/trailing non-breakable spaces (tested for html filter).

Examples:
<p>  <input tabindex="100" type="radio" name="P" value="R"> R </p>

<p><input name="Q" type="checkbox" value="J">
 <span class="x">(blah!)</span></p>

<p><span class="w" id="1"></span> <span id="2"></span> <span id="3"></span> (blah <span id="4" class="a b"></span>)</p>

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
- Didier Briel - 2013-06-12
  
  Can you post the (wrong) result as it appears in OmegaT?
  
  Didier
  
  If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Martin Fleurke - 2013-06-12

3.0:
R
(blah!)
(blah <s0></s0>)
2.6

<i0> R
<s0>(blah!)</s0>
<s0></s0> <s1></s1> (blah <s2></s2>)

Last edit: Martin Fleurke 2013-06-12

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Didier Briel - 2013-06-12

Despite the fact that it obliges to revalidate the segments, do you consider it globally an improvement, or a regression?

Didier

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Martin Fleurke - 2013-06-12

Its an improvement, and In my case it were only about 15 segments of many thousands. I can live with that.
I mentioned it mainly for the record.

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Didier Briel - 2013-06-12

Thank you for the report, it is useful to know the differences.

Yes, I knew Alex improved handling of  , but hadn't seen so far a concrete result.

Didier

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Log in to post a comment.