|
From: Trish W. <wh...@pc...> - 2007-01-26 21:31:23
|
> Most definitely, yes. No worries where those MO terms end up. Chris asked me about some MO terms and it jogged my memory that there were some other locations in MO where terms possibly of the type DataTransformation might fit and just wanted to send along. Looks like the initial list was fine then :-) [snip] > It may be we'll ultimately want to see OBI values reside in PATO - at least, > that would be the emerging OBO Foundry way. :-) Yep, that's the plan. I think some groups have already proposed terms for PATO based on this understading, Transcriptomics, Genomics... As well unit terms in the OBO Unit ontology. > There do also appear to be "unit" types in PATO, so this is another issue > we'd need to sort through re: the developing Units Ontology. Hmm, that's odd. Perhaps an artifact? Trish |