|
From: Ryan B. <rbr...@bc...> - 2008-01-25 03:03:48
|
> Just to start you off: In my case there are intentions to perform > actions fulfilled the content of the phrase and to accept the > obligations consequent on uttering the phrase. > (There are similar sorts of intentions involved e.g. in protocoll > applications. If the protocoll requires that I feed the mouse with > rice, and my brother, for a joke, leaves rice in the same room with > the mouse, my brother is not performing a protocoll application.) > BS > Assuming the manner the rice was left followed the requirements laid out in the protocol and your brother did not introduce and potentially confounding conditions (e.g., the protocol did not specify that it was BS specifically who had to feed the mice, the amount and condition the rice was left in was correct, he didn't jump around the room), from a experimental standpoint were not the requirements of the protocol were realized even if that was not your brother's intent? I believe this is what matters from those who would use OBI, since operationally I would not handle the results of the experiment any different than if you fed the mice (again since there was a proper application of the protocol, even if that was not the intent). Ryan |