Re: [Nocc-discuss] Performance with large-ish Mailbox

[Thomas O. <tho...@or...>]

Am Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:36:52 +0200
schrieb Tim Gerundt <ti...@ge...>: 

> What happend if change SORTARRIVAL into SORTDATE at the sort() function 
> from class "nocc_imap":

Yeah, that fixes the sorting.

But I have to check again at what stage my local copy of nocc is regarding performance ...

[Tue Apr 24 09:57:26 2012] [error] [client 87.158.40.181] ThOr: opening server
[Tue Apr 24 09:57:27 2012] [error] [client 87.158.40.181] ThOr: DONE opening server
[Tue Apr 24 09:57:27 2012] [error] [client 87.158.40.181] needed time:0.095389127731323
[Tue Apr 24 09:57:27 2012] [error] [client 87.158.40.181] ThOr: num_msg
[Tue Apr 24 09:57:27 2012] [error] [client 87.158.40.181] ThOr: num_msg
[Tue Apr 24 09:58:04 2012] [error] [client 87.158.40.181] ThOr: num_msg

Those are log entries from one request to display page 3 with 50 mails out of 871. Over half a minute of delay before the last call of num_msg, without much computing on the server side. Really have to dig around what happens during that time ... if time permits:-/

Well, you had the server opening optimized, that is not the bottleneck anymore.


Alrighty then,

Thomas